Timing of surgery for chronic subdural hematoma in patients with mild to moderate symptoms: a retrospective cohort study

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
M. Foppen, K.M. Slot, W.P. Vandertop, D. Verbaan
{"title":"Timing of surgery for chronic subdural hematoma in patients with mild to moderate symptoms: a retrospective cohort study","authors":"M. Foppen,&nbsp;K.M. Slot,&nbsp;W.P. Vandertop,&nbsp;D. Verbaan","doi":"10.1007/s00701-025-06552-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Burr hole drainage is the mainstay of treatment for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). However, the impact of the interval between diagnosis and surgery on clinical outcome is unknown. This study investigates whether surgical timing affects outcome in patients with mild to moderate symptoms who do not require immediate surgery.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a single center, retrospective cohort study of 330 surgically treated cSDH patients with a Markwalder Grading Scale score of 1–2, at the Amsterdam UMC, between 2012 and 2022. The interval between diagnosis and surgery was measured in hours and dichotomized (surgery within vs. after 24 h). To account for potential confounding by hematoma mass effect, patients were stratified based on midline shift (greater than 10 mm vs &lt; 10 mm). Primary outcomes included reoperation rate, complication rate, 30-day mortality, length of hospital stay and discharge destination. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed for each stratum.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean age of the cohort was 73 years, and 241 (73%) were male. The median time to surgery was 25 h (IQR 15–54). Among the 330 patients, 157 (48%) underwent surgery within 24 h after diagnosis. Patients who received early surgery (&lt; 24 h) had a significantly higher proportion of midline shift &gt; 10 mm compared to those undergoing later surgery (56% vs. 34%, p &lt; 0.001). The use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy did not differ between groups (47% vs 54%, p = 0.27). No significant association was found between surgical timing and any primary outcome across all strata.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In patients with cSDH presenting with mild to moderately symptoms, the timing of surgery did not affect clinical outcome, particularly as delayed surgery did not result in poorer outcomes. These findings suggest that postponing surgery to daytime hours may be safe in this subgroup. Validation in prospective studies, ideally incorporating functional outcomes, is nevertheless required to confirm these results and guide clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7370,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurochirurgica","volume":"167 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00701-025-06552-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurochirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00701-025-06552-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Burr hole drainage is the mainstay of treatment for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). However, the impact of the interval between diagnosis and surgery on clinical outcome is unknown. This study investigates whether surgical timing affects outcome in patients with mild to moderate symptoms who do not require immediate surgery.

Methods

We performed a single center, retrospective cohort study of 330 surgically treated cSDH patients with a Markwalder Grading Scale score of 1–2, at the Amsterdam UMC, between 2012 and 2022. The interval between diagnosis and surgery was measured in hours and dichotomized (surgery within vs. after 24 h). To account for potential confounding by hematoma mass effect, patients were stratified based on midline shift (greater than 10 mm vs < 10 mm). Primary outcomes included reoperation rate, complication rate, 30-day mortality, length of hospital stay and discharge destination. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed for each stratum.

Results

The mean age of the cohort was 73 years, and 241 (73%) were male. The median time to surgery was 25 h (IQR 15–54). Among the 330 patients, 157 (48%) underwent surgery within 24 h after diagnosis. Patients who received early surgery (< 24 h) had a significantly higher proportion of midline shift > 10 mm compared to those undergoing later surgery (56% vs. 34%, p < 0.001). The use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy did not differ between groups (47% vs 54%, p = 0.27). No significant association was found between surgical timing and any primary outcome across all strata.

Conclusion

In patients with cSDH presenting with mild to moderately symptoms, the timing of surgery did not affect clinical outcome, particularly as delayed surgery did not result in poorer outcomes. These findings suggest that postponing surgery to daytime hours may be safe in this subgroup. Validation in prospective studies, ideally incorporating functional outcomes, is nevertheless required to confirm these results and guide clinical practice.

轻中度症状的慢性硬膜下血肿患者的手术时机:一项回顾性队列研究
背景:钻孔引流术是治疗慢性硬膜下血肿(cSDH)的主要方法。然而,诊断和手术之间的间隔对临床结果的影响尚不清楚。本研究探讨手术时机是否会影响不需要立即手术的轻至中度症状患者的预后。方法:2012年至2022年,我们在阿姆斯特丹UMC进行了一项单中心、回顾性队列研究,纳入了330例手术治疗的cSDH患者,Markwalder评分为1-2分。诊断和手术之间的时间间隔以小时为单位进行测量,并进行二分类(24小时内手术与24小时后手术)。为了考虑血肿团块效应的潜在混淆,根据中线移位(大于10 mm vs小于10 mm)对患者进行分层。主要结局包括再手术率、并发症发生率、30天死亡率、住院时间和出院目的地。对每个地层进行单变量和多变量回归分析。结果队列平均年龄73岁,男性241例(73%)。中位手术时间为25小时(IQR 15-54)。330例患者中,157例(48%)在诊断后24小时内接受手术。接受早期手术(24h)的患者中线移位10mm的比例明显高于接受晚期手术的患者(56% vs. 34%, p < 0.001)。抗凝或抗血小板治疗的使用在两组之间没有差异(47% vs 54%, p = 0.27)。手术时间和所有年龄段的主要预后之间没有发现明显的关联。结论在表现为轻至中度症状的cSDH患者中,手术时机不影响临床结果,特别是延迟手术并不会导致较差的结果。这些发现表明,在这个亚组中,将手术推迟到白天可能是安全的。然而,需要在前瞻性研究中进行验证,理想地纳入功能结果,以确认这些结果并指导临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Neurochirurgica
Acta Neurochirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal "Acta Neurochirurgica" publishes only original papers useful both to research and clinical work. Papers should deal with clinical neurosurgery - diagnosis and diagnostic techniques, operative surgery and results, postoperative treatment - or with research work in neuroscience if the underlying questions or the results are of neurosurgical interest. Reports on congresses are given in brief accounts. As official organ of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies the journal publishes all announcements of the E.A.N.S. and reports on the activities of its member societies. Only contributions written in English will be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信