Implications of platform ecosystems on manufacturers’ selling model selection

IF 10 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Lipan Feng , Xiaoxu Chen , Minyue Jin , Yongjian Li , Wei Wang
{"title":"Implications of platform ecosystems on manufacturers’ selling model selection","authors":"Lipan Feng ,&nbsp;Xiaoxu Chen ,&nbsp;Minyue Jin ,&nbsp;Yongjian Li ,&nbsp;Wei Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Several major manufacturers, such as Apple and Xiaomi, have evolved into platform-based companies. They not only produce hardware products but also develop platform ecosystems that connect hardware product users and software developers. However, the existing literature rarely explores how the establishment of platform ecosystems affects the manufacturer’s optimal selling model choice. We consider a monopolistic manufacturer that establishes a platform ecosystem, generating revenue from both hardware sales and software developer access fees (service price). Furthermore, the manufacturer can choose the direct selling, reselling, and agency selling to distribute the hardware products. We primarily examine the impacts of establishing a platform ecosystem on hardware product pricing, profitability, and supply chain efficiency in different selling models. Our theoretical analysis first reveals that establishing a platform ecosystem, driven by cross-side network effects, can contribute to the reduction of hardware product prices. This incentive to lower prices is strongest under the agency selling, followed by the direct selling, and then the reselling. Second, compared with the scenario without a platform ecosystem, establishing a platform ecosystem will expand the manufacturer’s preference for agency selling over reselling. Third, the platform ecosystem can improve supply chain efficiency in reselling under a certain condition. However, agency selling consistently decreases in efficiency. Furthermore, contrary to traditional wisdom, when the commission rate is high and the cross-side network effect is low, supply chain efficiency under reselling surpasses that under agency selling. Last, we extended the model and reveal that consumers’ privacy concerns and the negative reverse network effect expand the region where agency selling dominates, while nonzero costs (production and service costs) and channel competition reduce this region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Production Economics","volume":"286 ","pages":"Article 109638"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Production Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527325001239","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several major manufacturers, such as Apple and Xiaomi, have evolved into platform-based companies. They not only produce hardware products but also develop platform ecosystems that connect hardware product users and software developers. However, the existing literature rarely explores how the establishment of platform ecosystems affects the manufacturer’s optimal selling model choice. We consider a monopolistic manufacturer that establishes a platform ecosystem, generating revenue from both hardware sales and software developer access fees (service price). Furthermore, the manufacturer can choose the direct selling, reselling, and agency selling to distribute the hardware products. We primarily examine the impacts of establishing a platform ecosystem on hardware product pricing, profitability, and supply chain efficiency in different selling models. Our theoretical analysis first reveals that establishing a platform ecosystem, driven by cross-side network effects, can contribute to the reduction of hardware product prices. This incentive to lower prices is strongest under the agency selling, followed by the direct selling, and then the reselling. Second, compared with the scenario without a platform ecosystem, establishing a platform ecosystem will expand the manufacturer’s preference for agency selling over reselling. Third, the platform ecosystem can improve supply chain efficiency in reselling under a certain condition. However, agency selling consistently decreases in efficiency. Furthermore, contrary to traditional wisdom, when the commission rate is high and the cross-side network effect is low, supply chain efficiency under reselling surpasses that under agency selling. Last, we extended the model and reveal that consumers’ privacy concerns and the negative reverse network effect expand the region where agency selling dominates, while nonzero costs (production and service costs) and channel competition reduce this region.
平台生态系统对厂商销售模式选择的影响
一些主要的制造商,如苹果和b小米,已经发展成为基于平台的公司。他们不仅生产硬件产品,还开发连接硬件产品用户和软件开发者的平台生态系统。然而,现有文献很少探讨平台生态系统的建立如何影响制造商的最优销售模式选择。我们考虑一个垄断的制造商,它建立了一个平台生态系统,从硬件销售和软件开发人员访问费用(服务价格)中获得收入。此外,制造商可以选择直销、转售和代理销售来分销硬件产品。我们主要考察了在不同销售模式下,建立平台生态系统对硬件产品定价、盈利能力和供应链效率的影响。我们的理论分析首先揭示了在横向网络效应的驱动下,建立平台生态系统有助于降低硬件产品的价格。这种降低价格的动机在代理销售下是最强的,其次是直销,然后是转售。第二,与没有平台生态系统的情况相比,建立平台生态系统将扩大制造商对代理销售的偏好。第三,在一定条件下,平台生态系统可以提高转售供应链的效率。然而,代理销售的效率一直在下降。此外,与传统观点相反,当佣金率高、横向网络效应低时,转售模式下的供应链效率高于代理销售模式下的供应链效率。最后,我们对模型进行了扩展,发现消费者对隐私的关注和负逆向网络效应扩大了代理销售占主导地位的区域,而非零成本(生产和服务成本)和渠道竞争则缩小了该区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Production Economics
International Journal of Production Economics 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
266
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Production Economics focuses on the interface between engineering and management. It covers all aspects of manufacturing and process industries, as well as production in general. The journal is interdisciplinary, considering activities throughout the product life cycle and material flow cycle. It aims to disseminate knowledge for improving industrial practice and strengthening the theoretical base for decision making. The journal serves as a forum for exchanging ideas and presenting new developments in theory and application, combining academic standards with practical value for industrial applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信