Preoperative prediction of four stranded hamstring graft size in anterior cruciate ligament Reconstruction: Is magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of semitendinosus and gracillis tendon better than anthropometric data?

Q2 Medicine
Bishnu Prasad , Sudhanshu Sekhar Das , Sudarsan Behera , Saroj Kumar Patra , Paulson Verghese , Ashish Kumar Satapathy
{"title":"Preoperative prediction of four stranded hamstring graft size in anterior cruciate ligament Reconstruction: Is magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of semitendinosus and gracillis tendon better than anthropometric data?","authors":"Bishnu Prasad ,&nbsp;Sudhanshu Sekhar Das ,&nbsp;Sudarsan Behera ,&nbsp;Saroj Kumar Patra ,&nbsp;Paulson Verghese ,&nbsp;Ashish Kumar Satapathy","doi":"10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To determine the correlation between intraoperative measurements of four-stranded hamstring grafts, preoperative MRI measurements, and anthropometric measurements. The study aimed to provide insights into graft diameter assessment and assist in the selection of hamstrings for graft preparation in the Indian population.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>In this prospective study, 50 patients with complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, with or without meniscal injuries, were included. Prior to surgery, anthropometric data and the largest axial diameter of the semitendinous and gracilis tendon at the medial femoral epicondyle were measured. The study aimed to establish correlations between Final diameter of the graft, preoperative hamstring graft diameter and anthropometric measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Radiological data was found to predict graft diameter better than anthropometric data. Gracilis diameter was more specific for graft diameters ≥8 mm.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Preoperative hamstring tendon diameter in the MRI is better predictor as compared to anthropometric data to predict of four strandend size of the graft.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 103057"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0976566225001559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

To determine the correlation between intraoperative measurements of four-stranded hamstring grafts, preoperative MRI measurements, and anthropometric measurements. The study aimed to provide insights into graft diameter assessment and assist in the selection of hamstrings for graft preparation in the Indian population.

Material and methods

In this prospective study, 50 patients with complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, with or without meniscal injuries, were included. Prior to surgery, anthropometric data and the largest axial diameter of the semitendinous and gracilis tendon at the medial femoral epicondyle were measured. The study aimed to establish correlations between Final diameter of the graft, preoperative hamstring graft diameter and anthropometric measurements.

Results

Radiological data was found to predict graft diameter better than anthropometric data. Gracilis diameter was more specific for graft diameters ≥8 mm.

Conclusion

Preoperative hamstring tendon diameter in the MRI is better predictor as compared to anthropometric data to predict of four strandend size of the graft.
前交叉韧带重建中四股腘绳肌腱移植物大小的术前预测:磁共振成像评估半腱肌和股薄肌腱比人体测量数据更好吗?
背景:确定术中四股腘绳肌腱移植测量、术前MRI测量和人体测量之间的相关性。该研究旨在为印度人群提供移植物直径评估的见解,并协助选择用于移植物准备的腿筋。材料和方法在这项前瞻性研究中,纳入了50例伴有或不伴有半月板损伤的完全性前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤患者。手术前,测量了人体测量数据和股上髁内侧半腱和股薄肌腱的最大轴向直径。该研究旨在建立移植物最终直径、术前腿筋移植物直径和人体测量值之间的相关性。结果放射学数据比人体测量数据更能预测移植物直径。结论术前腘绳肌肌腱直径与人体测量数据相比,MRI能更好地预测移植物的四股链大小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
92 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma (JCOT) aims to provide its readers with the latest clinical and basic research, and informed opinions that shape today''s orthopedic practice, thereby providing an opportunity to practice evidence-based medicine. With contributions from leading clinicians and researchers around the world, we aim to be the premier journal providing an international perspective advancing knowledge of the musculoskeletal system. JCOT publishes content of value to both general orthopedic practitioners and specialists on all aspects of musculoskeletal research, diagnoses, and treatment. We accept following types of articles: • Original articles focusing on current clinical issues. • Review articles with learning value for professionals as well as students. • Research articles providing the latest in basic biological or engineering research on musculoskeletal diseases. • Regular columns by experts discussing issues affecting the field of orthopedics. • "Symposia" devoted to a single topic offering the general reader an overview of a field, but providing the specialist current in-depth information. • Video of any orthopedic surgery which is innovative and adds to present concepts. • Articles emphasizing or demonstrating a new clinical sign in the art of patient examination is also considered for publication. Contributions from anywhere in the world are welcome and considered on their merits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信