{"title":"Emergence of carnelian/agate beads in the Gan-Qing region, Northwest China: New evidence from the western Hexi Corridor","authors":"Wanqiao Ai , Hui Wang , Guoke Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.ara.2025.100625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cultural exchanges in the Gansu-Qinghai region, especially the Hexi Corridor, surged during the early-to-mid-2nd millennium BCE. Previous studies have often focused on metalwork and the transformation of subsistence economies, whereas stone bead ornaments were seldom discussed. Based on the observations and scanning electron microscopy analysis of tens of carnelian/agate beads from the cemeteries of Huoshaogou and Ganguya in the western Hexi Corridor, we argue that some were imported in the form of finished products and some were locally made. In light of this, we reviewed recent publications and examined carnelian/agate beads and bead making evidence in the Gobi area dated from the 2nd millennium BCE. The preference for beads in the Gansu-Qinghai region began at the turn of the 4th and 3rd millennium BCE. During the 2nd millennium BCE, benefiting from the growth of long-distance exchange networks, some people in the Hexi Corridor were among the first to use ornaments of carnelian/agate, turquoise, fired steatite beads, and seashells. These ornaments later spread to the eastern Gansu-Qinghai region, neighboring the Zhou people. However, the use of carnelian/agate beads remained limited until the Zhou elite incorporated them into their funerary rites. Judging from the similar shapes and crafting features, the carnelian/agate beads in the Gan-Qing region may have had close connections with those circulating in contemporary Mongolia. This study on carnelian/agate beads provides new insights into craft production and society in the Northwest China and north–south exchanges in East Asia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51847,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Research in Asia","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100625"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological Research in Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352226725000352","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cultural exchanges in the Gansu-Qinghai region, especially the Hexi Corridor, surged during the early-to-mid-2nd millennium BCE. Previous studies have often focused on metalwork and the transformation of subsistence economies, whereas stone bead ornaments were seldom discussed. Based on the observations and scanning electron microscopy analysis of tens of carnelian/agate beads from the cemeteries of Huoshaogou and Ganguya in the western Hexi Corridor, we argue that some were imported in the form of finished products and some were locally made. In light of this, we reviewed recent publications and examined carnelian/agate beads and bead making evidence in the Gobi area dated from the 2nd millennium BCE. The preference for beads in the Gansu-Qinghai region began at the turn of the 4th and 3rd millennium BCE. During the 2nd millennium BCE, benefiting from the growth of long-distance exchange networks, some people in the Hexi Corridor were among the first to use ornaments of carnelian/agate, turquoise, fired steatite beads, and seashells. These ornaments later spread to the eastern Gansu-Qinghai region, neighboring the Zhou people. However, the use of carnelian/agate beads remained limited until the Zhou elite incorporated them into their funerary rites. Judging from the similar shapes and crafting features, the carnelian/agate beads in the Gan-Qing region may have had close connections with those circulating in contemporary Mongolia. This study on carnelian/agate beads provides new insights into craft production and society in the Northwest China and north–south exchanges in East Asia.
期刊介绍:
Archaeological Research in Asia presents high quality scholarly research conducted in between the Bosporus and the Pacific on a broad range of archaeological subjects of importance to audiences across Asia and around the world. The journal covers the traditional components of archaeology: placing events and patterns in time and space; analysis of past lifeways; and explanations for cultural processes and change. To this end, the publication will highlight theoretical and methodological advances in studying the past, present new data, and detail patterns that reshape our understanding of it. Archaeological Research in Asia publishes work on the full temporal range of archaeological inquiry from the earliest human presence in Asia with a special emphasis on time periods under-represented in other venues. Journal contributions are of three kinds: articles, case reports and short communications. Full length articles should present synthetic treatments, novel analyses, or theoretical approaches to unresolved issues. Case reports present basic data on subjects that are of broad interest because they represent key sites, sequences, and subjects that figure prominently, or should figure prominently, in how scholars both inside and outside Asia understand the archaeology of cultural and biological change through time. Short communications present new findings (e.g., radiocarbon dates) that are important to the extent that they reaffirm or change the way scholars in Asia and around the world think about Asian cultural or biological history.