The Effect of Cantilever Planning on Stress Distribution in Implant-Supported Prostheses.

Sema Ateşalp İleri, Neslihan Güntekin, Reza Mohammadi
{"title":"The Effect of Cantilever Planning on Stress Distribution in Implant-Supported Prostheses.","authors":"Sema Ateşalp İleri, Neslihan Güntekin, Reza Mohammadi","doi":"10.1563/aaid-joi-D-25-00019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This finite element analysis (FEA) study investigates the effects of different cantilever designs on stress distribution in implant-supported partial fixed dental prostheses. Three models were analyzed in the posterior mandible: Model A with a distal cantilever, Model B with a mesial cantilever, and Model C with no cantilevers. Each model included a four-unit monolithic zirconia prosthesis supported by two implants. Under a 200 N oblique load, stress distribution was analyzed in the cortical and trabecular bone, implant components, cement layer, and prosthesis. Fatigue performance was assessed using material-specific S-N curves and fatigue equations. The results demonstrated that models with cantilever extensions exhibited increased stress accumulation, particularly in components adjacent to the cantilever. The highest von Mises stress values were observed in Model A, especially on the distal abutment (721.2 MPa), distal implant (313.7 MPa), and prosthetic structure (409.9 MPa).In contrast, Model B showed a more balanced stress distribution and lower stress levels than Model A. The findings suggest that cantilevers' presence and positioning significantly impact implant supported prostheses' biomechanical behavior. With its shorter lever arm and more favorable force distribution, the mesial cantilever was a safer and more effective design option than the distal cantilever, reducing the risk of mechanical complications. These results emphasize the importance of careful design and engineering calculations when planning implant-supported prostheses to ensure long-term stability and minimize the likelihood of failure. This study highlights the biomechanical implications of cantilever positioning in implant prostheses.</p>","PeriodicalId":519890,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of oral implantology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of oral implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-25-00019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This finite element analysis (FEA) study investigates the effects of different cantilever designs on stress distribution in implant-supported partial fixed dental prostheses. Three models were analyzed in the posterior mandible: Model A with a distal cantilever, Model B with a mesial cantilever, and Model C with no cantilevers. Each model included a four-unit monolithic zirconia prosthesis supported by two implants. Under a 200 N oblique load, stress distribution was analyzed in the cortical and trabecular bone, implant components, cement layer, and prosthesis. Fatigue performance was assessed using material-specific S-N curves and fatigue equations. The results demonstrated that models with cantilever extensions exhibited increased stress accumulation, particularly in components adjacent to the cantilever. The highest von Mises stress values were observed in Model A, especially on the distal abutment (721.2 MPa), distal implant (313.7 MPa), and prosthetic structure (409.9 MPa).In contrast, Model B showed a more balanced stress distribution and lower stress levels than Model A. The findings suggest that cantilevers' presence and positioning significantly impact implant supported prostheses' biomechanical behavior. With its shorter lever arm and more favorable force distribution, the mesial cantilever was a safer and more effective design option than the distal cantilever, reducing the risk of mechanical complications. These results emphasize the importance of careful design and engineering calculations when planning implant-supported prostheses to ensure long-term stability and minimize the likelihood of failure. This study highlights the biomechanical implications of cantilever positioning in implant prostheses.

悬臂规划对种植体修复体应力分布的影响。
本文采用有限元分析方法研究了不同悬臂梁设计对种植体部分固定修复体应力分布的影响。对后颌骨进行三种模型分析:A模型有远端悬臂,B模型有近端悬臂,C模型没有悬臂。每个模型包括一个由两个植入物支撑的四单元整体氧化锆假体。在200 N斜向载荷下,分析骨皮质和骨小梁、种植体构件、骨水泥层和假体的应力分布。使用特定材料的S-N曲线和疲劳方程评估疲劳性能。结果表明,悬臂梁延伸的模型表现出增加的应力积累,特别是在悬臂梁附近的部件。模型A中von Mises应力值最大,尤其是基牙远端(721.2 MPa)、种植体远端(313.7 MPa)和假体结构(409.9 MPa)。相比之下,模型B表现出比模型a更平衡的应力分布和更低的应力水平。研究结果表明,悬臂的存在和定位显著影响种植体支撑假体的生物力学行为。与远端悬臂相比,近端悬臂的杠杆臂更短,力分布更有利,是一种更安全、更有效的设计选择,减少了机械并发症的风险。这些结果强调了在规划种植体支持的假体时仔细设计和工程计算的重要性,以确保长期稳定性并最大限度地减少失败的可能性。本研究强调了悬臂定位在种植体修复体中的生物力学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信