Social determinants of health and family planning: impact of food and financial insecurity on contraceptive use and pregnancy intention.

Breanna Sharp, Covenant Elenwo, Jordan Lowrimore, Caroline Markey, Micah Hartwell
{"title":"Social determinants of health and family planning: impact of food and financial insecurity on contraceptive use and pregnancy intention.","authors":"Breanna Sharp, Covenant Elenwo, Jordan Lowrimore, Caroline Markey, Micah Hartwell","doi":"10.1017/S1463423625000325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>In the United States, roughly one million pregnancies occur every year from the misuse and discontinuation of oral contraceptives - which may be affected by an individual's exposure to social determinants of health (SDOH). For those experiencing poorer SDOH, significant barriers may exist when family planning. Thus, our primary objective is to examine associations between domains of SDOH and contraceptive use as well as pregnancy intention using the Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis of 2017 BRFSS was conducted using the SDOH module to examine differences in family planning. We used bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models to measure associations, via odd ratios, between SDOHs and contraceptive use and pregnancy intention controlling for other sociodemographic variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that individuals experiencing negative SDOH who reported running out of food (AOR: 0.65; CI: 0.50-0.86), were unable to afford balanced meals (AOR: 0.64; CI:0.49-0.84), or had no money left at the end of the month (AOR: 0.45; CI: 0.32-0.64) were less likely to have used contraceptive methods compared to those not experiencing challenges within these SDOH domains. Among women not utilizing contraceptive methods, individuals not intending to get pregnant were more likely to report difficulty affording balanced meals or having financial stability compared to women attempting to become pregnant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study found that the SDOH domains of monthly financial instability and food insecurity are significantly associated with women not using contraceptive measures but not wanting to become pregnant. Addressing barriers to contraceptive access and FP is becoming more important with shifting policies regarding women's reproductive healthcare. For women seeking contraceptive and FP advice, increased funding may help provide a solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"26 ","pages":"e44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12099264/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423625000325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: In the United States, roughly one million pregnancies occur every year from the misuse and discontinuation of oral contraceptives - which may be affected by an individual's exposure to social determinants of health (SDOH). For those experiencing poorer SDOH, significant barriers may exist when family planning. Thus, our primary objective is to examine associations between domains of SDOH and contraceptive use as well as pregnancy intention using the Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).

Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of 2017 BRFSS was conducted using the SDOH module to examine differences in family planning. We used bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models to measure associations, via odd ratios, between SDOHs and contraceptive use and pregnancy intention controlling for other sociodemographic variables.

Results: We found that individuals experiencing negative SDOH who reported running out of food (AOR: 0.65; CI: 0.50-0.86), were unable to afford balanced meals (AOR: 0.64; CI:0.49-0.84), or had no money left at the end of the month (AOR: 0.45; CI: 0.32-0.64) were less likely to have used contraceptive methods compared to those not experiencing challenges within these SDOH domains. Among women not utilizing contraceptive methods, individuals not intending to get pregnant were more likely to report difficulty affording balanced meals or having financial stability compared to women attempting to become pregnant.

Conclusions: Our study found that the SDOH domains of monthly financial instability and food insecurity are significantly associated with women not using contraceptive measures but not wanting to become pregnant. Addressing barriers to contraceptive access and FP is becoming more important with shifting policies regarding women's reproductive healthcare. For women seeking contraceptive and FP advice, increased funding may help provide a solution.

健康和计划生育的社会决定因素:粮食和财政不安全对避孕药具使用和怀孕意图的影响。
目的:在美国,每年大约有100万例怀孕是由于误用和停用口服避孕药——这可能受到个人接触健康社会决定因素(SDOH)的影响。对于那些经历较差的SDOH的人,在计划生育时可能存在重大障碍。因此,我们的主要目标是使用行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)来检查SDOH和避孕使用以及怀孕意图之间的关系。方法:采用SDOH模块对2017年BRFSS进行横断面分析,检验计划生育的差异。我们使用双变量和多变量logistic回归模型,通过奇比来测量SDOHs与避孕药具使用和怀孕意图之间的关联,并控制了其他社会人口统计学变量。结果:我们发现经历负SDOH的个体报告食物耗尽(AOR: 0.65;CI: 0.50-0.86),无法负担均衡膳食(AOR: 0.64;CI:0.49-0.84),或者月底没有剩余的钱(AOR: 0.45;CI: 0.32-0.64)与那些在这些SDOH领域内没有遇到挑战的人相比,使用避孕方法的可能性更小。在没有使用避孕方法的女性中,与试图怀孕的女性相比,不打算怀孕的女性更有可能报告难以负担均衡的膳食或经济稳定。结论:我们的研究发现,每月财务不稳定和粮食不安全的SDOH域与不使用避孕措施但不想怀孕的妇女显着相关。随着妇女生殖保健政策的转变,解决避孕药具获取和计划生育方面的障碍变得越来越重要。对于寻求避孕和计划生育建议的妇女,增加资金可能有助于提供解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信