Image Control After Aneurysm Clipping: Is 3D Computed Tomogram Angiography Enough?

Sebastián Menéndez-Girón, Antonio González-Crespo, Alberto Blanco Ibáñez de Opacua, Roser García-Armengol, Carlos J Dominguez, Ana Rodríguez-Hernández
{"title":"Image Control After Aneurysm Clipping: Is 3D Computed Tomogram Angiography Enough?","authors":"Sebastián Menéndez-Girón, Antonio González-Crespo, Alberto Blanco Ibáñez de Opacua, Roser García-Armengol, Carlos J Dominguez, Ana Rodríguez-Hernández","doi":"10.1016/j.neucie.2025.500677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cerebral digital subtraction angiography (DSA) remains the gold standard for the control of aneurysmal remnants after surgical clipping. Despite being associated with minimal risks, it is an invasive procedure far from being iatrogenia free. Furthermore, it has limited availability which may prolong patient's postoperative stay. On the other hand, the image quality of computed tomography angiography (CTA) has improved significantly over the past decades providing a valuable alternative to DSA. The objective of this study was to compare the capacity of CTA and DSA to detect clinically significant aneurysmal remnants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From a prospective series of surgically treated aneurysms, those with postoperative CTA and DSA were retrospectively included in the study. A three-dimensional reconstruction of the CTA was performed using the Brainlab Elements software and the results were compared with those of the DSA. In addition, variables that could affect the three-dimensional reconstruction were collected, such as the number of clips per aneurysm and previous clipping or embolization. In case of an aneurysm remnant, its size was also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between January 2020 and January 2022, a total of 42 patients in whom 52 aneurysms were clipped (8 of them ruptured) were included. CTA presented a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 97% in the detection of aneurysmal remnants. The cases in which CTA did not detect the aneurysmal remnant were previously embolized aneurysms or complex aneurysms that required neck reconstruction with 3 or more clips. None of the remnants undetected by CTA were significant enough to warrant retreatment of the aneurysm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Excluding complex aneurysms (previously embolized or requiring surgical reconstruction with 3 or more clips), three-dimensional reconstructions of CTA images showed excellent results in detecting clinically significant postoperative aneurysm remnants and may obviate the need for a the more invasive and less available DSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":74273,"journal":{"name":"Neurocirugia (English Edition)","volume":" ","pages":"500677"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocirugia (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucie.2025.500677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cerebral digital subtraction angiography (DSA) remains the gold standard for the control of aneurysmal remnants after surgical clipping. Despite being associated with minimal risks, it is an invasive procedure far from being iatrogenia free. Furthermore, it has limited availability which may prolong patient's postoperative stay. On the other hand, the image quality of computed tomography angiography (CTA) has improved significantly over the past decades providing a valuable alternative to DSA. The objective of this study was to compare the capacity of CTA and DSA to detect clinically significant aneurysmal remnants.

Methods: From a prospective series of surgically treated aneurysms, those with postoperative CTA and DSA were retrospectively included in the study. A three-dimensional reconstruction of the CTA was performed using the Brainlab Elements software and the results were compared with those of the DSA. In addition, variables that could affect the three-dimensional reconstruction were collected, such as the number of clips per aneurysm and previous clipping or embolization. In case of an aneurysm remnant, its size was also recorded.

Results: Between January 2020 and January 2022, a total of 42 patients in whom 52 aneurysms were clipped (8 of them ruptured) were included. CTA presented a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 97% in the detection of aneurysmal remnants. The cases in which CTA did not detect the aneurysmal remnant were previously embolized aneurysms or complex aneurysms that required neck reconstruction with 3 or more clips. None of the remnants undetected by CTA were significant enough to warrant retreatment of the aneurysm.

Conclusions: Excluding complex aneurysms (previously embolized or requiring surgical reconstruction with 3 or more clips), three-dimensional reconstructions of CTA images showed excellent results in detecting clinically significant postoperative aneurysm remnants and may obviate the need for a the more invasive and less available DSA.

动脉瘤夹闭后的图像控制:三维计算机断层血管造影是否足够?
背景:脑数字减影血管造影(DSA)仍然是手术夹持后控制动脉瘤残余的金标准。尽管风险很小,但它是一种侵入性手术,远非无医源性。此外,它的可用性有限,可能会延长患者术后的住院时间。另一方面,计算机断层血管造影(CTA)的图像质量在过去几十年中有了显着改善,为DSA提供了一个有价值的替代方案。本研究的目的是比较CTA和DSA检测有临床意义的动脉瘤残余的能力。方法:从前瞻性的一系列手术治疗动脉瘤中,回顾性地纳入术后CTA和DSA的研究。使用Brainlab Elements软件对CTA进行三维重建,并将结果与DSA进行比较。此外,收集可能影响三维重建的变量,如每个动脉瘤的夹夹数量和以前的夹夹或栓塞。如果动脉瘤残留,也记录其大小。结果:2020年1月至2022年1月,共纳入42例患者,其中52例动脉瘤被夹闭(其中8例破裂)。CTA检测动脉瘤残余的灵敏度为50%,特异性为97%。CTA未检测到残余动脉瘤的病例是先前栓塞的动脉瘤或复杂的动脉瘤,需要用3个或更多的夹子重建颈部。未被CTA检测到的残余均不足以保证动脉瘤的再次治疗。结论:排除复杂动脉瘤(先前栓塞或需要使用3个或更多夹子进行手术重建),CTA图像的三维重建在检测临床上重要的术后动脉瘤残余方面显示出极好的效果,并可能避免对更具侵入性和可用性较低的DSA的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信