Abigail Duerst, Anna Vanderschaegen, Juliana M Kling, Lisa Graves
{"title":"Medical School Faculty Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Sex and Gender-Based Medicine.","authors":"Abigail Duerst, Anna Vanderschaegen, Juliana M Kling, Lisa Graves","doi":"10.22454/PRiMER.2025.910249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A person's sex and/or gender may influence the pathogenesis, presentation, and therapeutic response to disease; yet, the impact of sex and gender is not routinely evaluated in medical research, nor adequately emphasized in medical school curricula. Little is known about medical school faculty knowledge and attitudes regarding sex and gender-based medicine (SGBM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered an online survey to 158 faculty members at WMU Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine. The survey of knowledge on SGBM was adapted from two prior surveys used in medical student and resident populations and modified for faculty participants. Hidden curriculum theory, which proposes students learn through formal curriculum as well as through passive perceptions of faculty and institutional attitudes, was used as a theoretical lens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight of 158 recipients completed the survey, for a 24% response rate. Respondents answered an average of 48.53% of the knowledge questions correctly; percent correct did not differ significantly between men and women faculty members (<i>P</i>= .2732). Seventy one percent of respondents indicated it was important or very important to consider sex and gender when providing patient care. Only 24% indicated they had some formal or continuing education on the topic. Respondents indicated interest in educational opportunities for SGBM in the form of online modules or lectures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Though faculty respondents endorsed SGBM, few have had formal education related to the topic. Faculty development on SGBM may close knowledge gaps and facilitate integration of this curriculum. The survey tool developed through this project may be useful for other institutions engaged in similar efforts related to SGBM.</p>","PeriodicalId":74494,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","volume":"9 ","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081019/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2025.910249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: A person's sex and/or gender may influence the pathogenesis, presentation, and therapeutic response to disease; yet, the impact of sex and gender is not routinely evaluated in medical research, nor adequately emphasized in medical school curricula. Little is known about medical school faculty knowledge and attitudes regarding sex and gender-based medicine (SGBM).
Methods: We administered an online survey to 158 faculty members at WMU Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine. The survey of knowledge on SGBM was adapted from two prior surveys used in medical student and resident populations and modified for faculty participants. Hidden curriculum theory, which proposes students learn through formal curriculum as well as through passive perceptions of faculty and institutional attitudes, was used as a theoretical lens.
Results: Thirty-eight of 158 recipients completed the survey, for a 24% response rate. Respondents answered an average of 48.53% of the knowledge questions correctly; percent correct did not differ significantly between men and women faculty members (P= .2732). Seventy one percent of respondents indicated it was important or very important to consider sex and gender when providing patient care. Only 24% indicated they had some formal or continuing education on the topic. Respondents indicated interest in educational opportunities for SGBM in the form of online modules or lectures.
Conclusion: Though faculty respondents endorsed SGBM, few have had formal education related to the topic. Faculty development on SGBM may close knowledge gaps and facilitate integration of this curriculum. The survey tool developed through this project may be useful for other institutions engaged in similar efforts related to SGBM.
一个人的性别和/或性别可能影响疾病的发病机制、表现和治疗反应;然而,性和社会性别的影响在医学研究中没有得到常规评估,在医学院的课程中也没有得到充分强调。人们对医学院教师关于性和基于性别的医学(SGBM)的知识和态度知之甚少。方法:我们对WMU Homer Stryker医学院的158名教员进行了一项在线调查。对SGBM知识的调查改编自先前在医学生和居民人群中使用的两次调查,并针对教师参与者进行了修改。隐性课程理论建议学生通过正式课程以及对教师和机构态度的被动感知来学习,该理论被用作理论视角。结果:158名接受者中有38人完成了调查,回复率为24%。受访者平均正确率为48.53%;正确率在男女教员之间没有显著差异(P= 0.2732)。71%的受访者表示,在提供患者护理时考虑性别和性别是重要的或非常重要的。只有24%的人表示他们在这方面接受过一些正式或继续的教育。受访者表示对在线模块或讲座形式的SGBM教育机会感兴趣。结论:尽管受访教师支持SGBM,但很少有人接受过与该主题相关的正规教育。教师在SGBM上的发展可以缩小知识差距,促进课程的整合。通过该项目开发的调查工具可能对从事与SGBM有关的类似工作的其他机构有用。