LGBTQ+ Health Education: Student Experiences at a Midwest Medical School.

PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) Pub Date : 2025-04-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.22454/PRiMER.2025.829484
Tess I Jewell, Eden F Charles, Elizabeth M Petty
{"title":"LGBTQ+ Health Education: Student Experiences at a Midwest Medical School.","authors":"Tess I Jewell, Eden F Charles, Elizabeth M Petty","doi":"10.22454/PRiMER.2025.829484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The current sociopolitical landscape surrounding lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) communities involves discrimination in multiple areas of life. Medical education on LGBTQ+ health is often variable and incomplete. As part of a comprehensive evaluation of LGBTQ+ health in our curriculum, we explored student experiences learning about LGBTQ+ health during medical school, including the impact of the sociopolitical landscape.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted focus groups of medical students at a single Midwest institution in March 2024. All medical students were invited to participate. We analyzed the data using an inductive systematic hierarchical thematic qualitative analysis approach to describe key themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen medical students participated in three focus groups. Analysis demonstrated 13 key themes across three domains: (1) elements that impacted student learning (six key themes, 28 subthemes); (2) aspects participants would change regarding how LGBTQ+ health is taught (four key themes, 11 subthemes); and (3) ways the sociopolitical landscape has impacted their education or anticipated career trajectory (three key themes). Most participants reported that the current sociopolitical landscape surrounding LGBTQ+ communities has impacted their education or anticipated career trajectory.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Medical students described positive, negative, and neutral factors that impacted their education on LGBTQ+ health in the formal and hidden curriculum. Students described insufficient learning opportunities in preclinical and clinical settings with various factors in the hidden curriculum impacting their learning. The current sociopolitical landscape surrounding LGBTQ+ communities may influence where medical students pursue future training and careers due to learning goals or identity.</p>","PeriodicalId":74494,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","volume":"9 ","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081027/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2025.829484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The current sociopolitical landscape surrounding lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) communities involves discrimination in multiple areas of life. Medical education on LGBTQ+ health is often variable and incomplete. As part of a comprehensive evaluation of LGBTQ+ health in our curriculum, we explored student experiences learning about LGBTQ+ health during medical school, including the impact of the sociopolitical landscape.

Methods: We conducted focus groups of medical students at a single Midwest institution in March 2024. All medical students were invited to participate. We analyzed the data using an inductive systematic hierarchical thematic qualitative analysis approach to describe key themes.

Results: Eighteen medical students participated in three focus groups. Analysis demonstrated 13 key themes across three domains: (1) elements that impacted student learning (six key themes, 28 subthemes); (2) aspects participants would change regarding how LGBTQ+ health is taught (four key themes, 11 subthemes); and (3) ways the sociopolitical landscape has impacted their education or anticipated career trajectory (three key themes). Most participants reported that the current sociopolitical landscape surrounding LGBTQ+ communities has impacted their education or anticipated career trajectory.

Conclusion: Medical students described positive, negative, and neutral factors that impacted their education on LGBTQ+ health in the formal and hidden curriculum. Students described insufficient learning opportunities in preclinical and clinical settings with various factors in the hidden curriculum impacting their learning. The current sociopolitical landscape surrounding LGBTQ+ communities may influence where medical students pursue future training and careers due to learning goals or identity.

LGBTQ+健康教育:中西部一所医学院的学生经历。
导读:当前围绕女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人和酷儿(LGBTQ+)群体的社会政治格局涉及到生活中多个领域的歧视。关于LGBTQ+健康的医学教育往往是可变的和不完整的。作为课程中LGBTQ+健康综合评估的一部分,我们探索了学生在医学院学习LGBTQ+健康的经历,包括社会政治环境的影响。方法:我们于2024年3月在中西部一所院校对医学生进行了焦点小组调查。所有医科学生都被邀请参加。我们使用归纳系统层次主题定性分析方法来描述关键主题。结果:18名医学生参加了三个焦点小组。分析显示了三个领域的13个关键主题:(1)影响学生学习的要素(6个关键主题,28个副主题);(2)参与者对LGBTQ+健康教育的看法(4个重点主题,11个副主题);(3)社会政治环境如何影响他们的教育或预期的职业轨迹(三个关键主题)。大多数参与者报告说,当前围绕LGBTQ+社区的社会政治格局已经影响了他们的教育或预期的职业轨迹。结论:医学生在正式课程和隐性课程中分别描述了影响其LGBTQ+健康教育的正面、负面和中性因素。学生描述在临床前和临床环境中学习机会不足,隐藏课程中的各种因素影响他们的学习。当前围绕LGBTQ+社区的社会政治格局可能会影响医学生由于学习目标或身份而追求未来培训和职业的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信