Comparison of quit rates among exclusive cigarette smokers at Tobacco Control Center in Qatar: telephone versus face-to-face consultation.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Muslem M Aljaafar, Silva Kouyoumjian, Gafar Mahmoud, Ahmad AlMulla
{"title":"Comparison of quit rates among exclusive cigarette smokers at Tobacco Control Center in Qatar: telephone versus face-to-face consultation.","authors":"Muslem M Aljaafar, Silva Kouyoumjian, Gafar Mahmoud, Ahmad AlMulla","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02858-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the coronavirus 2019 pandemic, smoking cessation services were delivered by telephone instead of routine face-to-face care. The objective of this study was to (1) determine if telephone care increases smoking quit rate compared to face-to-face intervention and (2) investigate factors associated with successful smoking cessation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study design was utilized. Random selection of patients from two groups (face-to-face care and telephone care) that completed 3 follow-up sessions in Tobacco Control Center in Hamad Medical Corporation in Qatar was conducted from April 2020 to September 2021. Quit rates were compared at 4-week, 8-week and 12-week follow-up visits and a multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to obtain factors related to successful quitting at 12-week follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 138 patients were included in this study (69 patients for each group). At 12-week follow-up, 31.9% of patients of telephone care (n = 22) succeeded in quitting smoking, while only 20.3% (n = 14) remained abstinent in the face-to-face care group. Telephone care compared with standard care increased the odds of success in stopping smoking (AOR = 3.279; 95% Cl: 1.191-9.026). Also, smokers with a previous quit attempt were significantly related to stopping smoking successfully (AOR = 4.724; 95% Cl: 1.131-19.727). Higher consumption of self-reported cigarette smoking was statistically associated with lower success rates in smoking cessation (AOR = 0.919; 95% Cl: 0.874-0.966).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggests that providing telephone care seems more effective in smoking cessation treatment compared with routine face-to-face intervention. However, further formal assessment as randomized clinical trial needs to be conducted for more evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"168"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02858-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During the coronavirus 2019 pandemic, smoking cessation services were delivered by telephone instead of routine face-to-face care. The objective of this study was to (1) determine if telephone care increases smoking quit rate compared to face-to-face intervention and (2) investigate factors associated with successful smoking cessation.

Methods: A retrospective study design was utilized. Random selection of patients from two groups (face-to-face care and telephone care) that completed 3 follow-up sessions in Tobacco Control Center in Hamad Medical Corporation in Qatar was conducted from April 2020 to September 2021. Quit rates were compared at 4-week, 8-week and 12-week follow-up visits and a multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to obtain factors related to successful quitting at 12-week follow-up.

Results: A total of 138 patients were included in this study (69 patients for each group). At 12-week follow-up, 31.9% of patients of telephone care (n = 22) succeeded in quitting smoking, while only 20.3% (n = 14) remained abstinent in the face-to-face care group. Telephone care compared with standard care increased the odds of success in stopping smoking (AOR = 3.279; 95% Cl: 1.191-9.026). Also, smokers with a previous quit attempt were significantly related to stopping smoking successfully (AOR = 4.724; 95% Cl: 1.131-19.727). Higher consumption of self-reported cigarette smoking was statistically associated with lower success rates in smoking cessation (AOR = 0.919; 95% Cl: 0.874-0.966).

Conclusion: Our data suggests that providing telephone care seems more effective in smoking cessation treatment compared with routine face-to-face intervention. However, further formal assessment as randomized clinical trial needs to be conducted for more evaluation.

卡塔尔烟草控制中心专门吸烟者戒烟率的比较:电话与面对面咨询。
背景:在2019冠状病毒大流行期间,戒烟服务是通过电话提供的,而不是常规的面对面护理。本研究的目的是:(1)确定与面对面干预相比,电话护理是否能提高戒烟率;(2)调查与成功戒烟相关的因素。方法:采用回顾性研究设计。从2020年4月至2021年9月在卡塔尔哈马德医疗公司烟草控制中心完成3次随访的两组患者(面对面护理和电话护理)中随机选择患者。比较4周、8周和12周随访时的戒烟率,并进行多变量logistic回归分析,以获得12周随访时成功戒烟的相关因素。结果:本研究共纳入138例患者(每组69例)。随访12周时,电话护理组(22例)有31.9%的患者成功戒烟,而面对面护理组(14例)只有20.3%的患者保持戒烟。与标准护理相比,电话护理增加了成功戒烟的几率(AOR = 3.279;95% Cl: 1.191 ~ 9.026)。此外,有过戒烟尝试的吸烟者与戒烟成功有显著相关(AOR = 4.724;95% Cl: 1.131-19.727)。在统计上,自述吸烟次数越多,戒烟成功率越低(AOR = 0.919;95% Cl: 0.874-0.966)。结论:我们的数据表明,与常规的面对面干预相比,提供电话护理似乎在戒烟治疗中更有效。但是,需要进一步进行随机临床试验的正式评估,进行更多的评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信