{"title":"Brief interventions for suicidal ideation in primary care: a systematic review.","authors":"Puya Younesi, Carolin Haas, Tobias Dreischulte, Andrea Schmitt, Jochen Gensichen, Karoline Lukaschek","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02848-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>General practitioners (GPs) play a crucial role in assessing and diagnosing suicidal ideation, often acting as the first person of contact for individuals with mental health concerns. Given the time constraints faced by primary care providers, interventions need to be brief and easily implemented. This systematic review seeks to identify, compare, and critically evaluate effective brief interventions for managing suicidality in primary care, offering a comprehensive overview and discussion of key findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was conducted using databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, PSYNDEX, and PsychINFO, supplemented by manual searches. Our search strategy focused on studies from 2000 to 2023. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 Tool, and evidence quality was evaluated using GRADE, with adherence to the PRISMA-DTA checklist. A protocol was published in PROSPERO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 1248 publications. Of those, 44 were assessed for eligibility after screening, ultimately resulting in five included studies addressing four brief interventions for suicidality in primary care. Motivational interviews, safety planning, structured follow-ups, and collaborative care models were identified as key elements for future interventions to enhance the role of primary care in suicide prevention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights the need for further research to adapt brief interventions for primary care suicide prevention. Given their central role in patient care, GPs are well-positioned to identify and support individuals at risk. While initial promising approaches have emerged, further research in primary care suicide prevention is needed, and interventions tailored to the GP setting must be developed.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"167"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080141/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02848-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: General practitioners (GPs) play a crucial role in assessing and diagnosing suicidal ideation, often acting as the first person of contact for individuals with mental health concerns. Given the time constraints faced by primary care providers, interventions need to be brief and easily implemented. This systematic review seeks to identify, compare, and critically evaluate effective brief interventions for managing suicidality in primary care, offering a comprehensive overview and discussion of key findings.
Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted using databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, PSYNDEX, and PsychINFO, supplemented by manual searches. Our search strategy focused on studies from 2000 to 2023. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 Tool, and evidence quality was evaluated using GRADE, with adherence to the PRISMA-DTA checklist. A protocol was published in PROSPERO.
Results: The search yielded 1248 publications. Of those, 44 were assessed for eligibility after screening, ultimately resulting in five included studies addressing four brief interventions for suicidality in primary care. Motivational interviews, safety planning, structured follow-ups, and collaborative care models were identified as key elements for future interventions to enhance the role of primary care in suicide prevention.
Conclusion: This review highlights the need for further research to adapt brief interventions for primary care suicide prevention. Given their central role in patient care, GPs are well-positioned to identify and support individuals at risk. While initial promising approaches have emerged, further research in primary care suicide prevention is needed, and interventions tailored to the GP setting must be developed.
背景:全科医生在评估和诊断自杀意念方面发挥着至关重要的作用,通常是有心理健康问题的个体的第一个接触者。鉴于初级保健提供者所面临的时间限制,干预措施必须简短且易于实施。本系统综述旨在识别、比较和批判性评估在初级保健中管理自杀的有效简短干预措施,并对主要发现进行全面概述和讨论。方法:采用MEDLINE、EMBASE、The Cochrane Library、PSYNDEX、PsychINFO等数据库进行系统文献综述,并辅以人工检索。我们的搜索策略集中于2000年至2023年的研究。使用Cochrane RoB 2工具评估偏倚风险,使用GRADE评估证据质量,并遵守PRISMA-DTA检查表。一份协议发表在普洛斯彼罗杂志上。结果:检索得到1248篇出版物。其中,44人在筛选后进行了资格评估,最终产生了5项纳入研究,解决了初级保健中四种简短的自杀干预措施。动机访谈、安全规划、结构化随访和协作护理模式被确定为未来干预措施的关键要素,以增强初级保健在自杀预防中的作用。结论:本综述强调需要进一步研究以适应初级保健自杀预防的简短干预措施。鉴于全科医生在病人护理中的核心作用,他们能够很好地识别和支持处于危险中的个人。虽然最初有希望的方法已经出现,但需要进一步研究初级保健自杀预防,并且必须开发适合全科医生设置的干预措施。