Influence of Reproductive Health Policy on West Texas Medical Students' Specialty and Residency Choices.

PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) Pub Date : 2025-04-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.22454/PRiMER.2025.512781
Sachi Khemka, Merry Mathew, Betsy Jones
{"title":"Influence of Reproductive Health Policy on West Texas Medical Students' Specialty and Residency Choices.","authors":"Sachi Khemka, Merry Mathew, Betsy Jones","doi":"10.22454/PRiMER.2025.512781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gender-based differences in medical student preferences are of growing interest. This study examines specialty choice and family planning preferences among medical students in Lubbock, Texas. It also assesses the impact of reproductive health policy changes on specialty choice and desired residency location.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Qualtrics (Silver Lake) survey was sent to 172 first-year medical students from Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (TTUHSC) School of Medicine. Males' responses were compared with females' responses using an unpaired <i>t</i> test with a significance threshold of 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surveys were returned by 90 male and 82 female participants. Results show that both genders exhibited moderate interest in primary care and surgical specialties, with males showing higher interest in becoming medical subspecialists (<i>P</i>=.0010). Female participants were less inclined than males to consider having a child during medical school (<i>P</i>=.0168) and residency (<i>P</i>=.0461). Males expressed lower concern than females about reproductive health policy impacts on specialty choice (<i>P</i><.0001) and preferred residency location (<i>P</i>=.0003). Family planning considerations were equally moderate in impacting specialty choice for both genders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings indicate that male students are more open to the idea of having a child during training and that reproductive health policy changes have had a larger influence on female students' specialty choice and desired match location. To support physicians-in-training, educators should integrate family planning discussions, prioritize reproductive health education, advocate for and improve residency transparency on parental leave policies, and help students navigate residency applications amid policy changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":74494,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","volume":"9 ","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081016/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2025.512781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Gender-based differences in medical student preferences are of growing interest. This study examines specialty choice and family planning preferences among medical students in Lubbock, Texas. It also assesses the impact of reproductive health policy changes on specialty choice and desired residency location.

Methods: A Qualtrics (Silver Lake) survey was sent to 172 first-year medical students from Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (TTUHSC) School of Medicine. Males' responses were compared with females' responses using an unpaired t test with a significance threshold of 0.05.

Results: Surveys were returned by 90 male and 82 female participants. Results show that both genders exhibited moderate interest in primary care and surgical specialties, with males showing higher interest in becoming medical subspecialists (P=.0010). Female participants were less inclined than males to consider having a child during medical school (P=.0168) and residency (P=.0461). Males expressed lower concern than females about reproductive health policy impacts on specialty choice (P<.0001) and preferred residency location (P=.0003). Family planning considerations were equally moderate in impacting specialty choice for both genders.

Conclusions: The findings indicate that male students are more open to the idea of having a child during training and that reproductive health policy changes have had a larger influence on female students' specialty choice and desired match location. To support physicians-in-training, educators should integrate family planning discussions, prioritize reproductive health education, advocate for and improve residency transparency on parental leave policies, and help students navigate residency applications amid policy changes.

生殖健康政策对西德州医学院学生专业和住院医师选择的影响
导言:基于性别的医学生偏好差异越来越受到关注。本研究调查了德克萨斯州拉伯克市医学生的专业选择和计划生育偏好。它还评估了生殖健康政策变化对专业选择和期望居住地点的影响。方法:对172名德克萨斯理工大学健康科学中心(TTUHSC)医学院一年级医学生进行qualics (Silver Lake)问卷调查。采用显著性阈值为0.05的非配对t检验比较男性和女性的反应。结果:共有90名男性和82名女性参与了调查。结果显示,男女都对初级保健和外科专科表现出中等程度的兴趣,男性对成为医学专科医生表现出更高的兴趣(P= 0.0010)。在医学院期间(P= 0.0168)和住院医师期间(P= 0.0461),女性参与者比男性更不倾向于考虑要孩子。男性对生殖健康政策对专业选择影响的关注程度低于女性(PP=.0003)。计划生育因素对男女专业选择的影响同样温和。结论:研究结果表明,在培训期间,男学生对生育的想法更开放,生殖健康政策的变化对女学生的专业选择和期望匹配地点的影响更大。为了支持实习医师,教育工作者应该整合计划生育讨论,优先考虑生殖健康教育,倡导并提高育婴假政策的住院医师透明度,并帮助学生在政策变化中顺利申请住院医师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信