Partial Meniscectomy Increases Risk of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Surgery Compared With Meniscus Repair in Patients With Concurrent Meniscus and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Abhinav R Balu, Avani Chopra, Augustus Demanes, Peter C Shen, Rithvik R Balu, Michael Terry, Vehniah K Tjong
{"title":"Partial Meniscectomy Increases Risk of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Surgery Compared With Meniscus Repair in Patients With Concurrent Meniscus and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.","authors":"Abhinav R Balu, Avani Chopra, Augustus Demanes, Peter C Shen, Rithvik R Balu, Michael Terry, Vehniah K Tjong","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the rates of revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, meniscal reoperation, and total knee arthroplasty associated with partial meniscectomy and meniscal repair performed at the time of index ACL reconstruction in patients with concurrent meniscus and ACL tears.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The TriNetX database was queried for patients undergoing ACL reconstruction after January 1, 2000, with minimum 1-year clinical follow up. Inclusion criteria for this study were patients who had partial meniscectomy, meniscal repair, or isolated ACL reconstruction without meniscus injury. Statistical analyses were performed using Python with significance thresholds of P < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 39,126 patients were followed for an average of 5.02 years. Patients undergoing meniscal repair were less likely to experience revision ACL reconstruction compared with those undergoing partial meniscectomy (relative risk [RR] 0.78, confidence interval [CI] 0.71-0.85, P < .001). Meniscus reoperation occurred significantly more in patients undergoing meniscal repair (RR 1.26, CI 1.17-1.35, P < .001) than those undergoing partial meniscectomy. Regarding total knee arthroplasty, partial meniscectomy carried a more than 6-fold increased risk compared with isolated ACL reconstruction (RR 6.4, CI 2.49-16.42, P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with ACL injury, ACL reconstruction, and concurrent meniscus tear, those patients treated with meniscus repair were less likely to undergo revision surgery. In these patients, medial meniscal injuries were associated with ACL revision than lateral meniscal injury regardless of the method of treatment. When meniscus repair is performed, this is associated with lower rate of future total knee arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.05.006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the rates of revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, meniscal reoperation, and total knee arthroplasty associated with partial meniscectomy and meniscal repair performed at the time of index ACL reconstruction in patients with concurrent meniscus and ACL tears.

Methods: The TriNetX database was queried for patients undergoing ACL reconstruction after January 1, 2000, with minimum 1-year clinical follow up. Inclusion criteria for this study were patients who had partial meniscectomy, meniscal repair, or isolated ACL reconstruction without meniscus injury. Statistical analyses were performed using Python with significance thresholds of P < .05.

Results: A total of 39,126 patients were followed for an average of 5.02 years. Patients undergoing meniscal repair were less likely to experience revision ACL reconstruction compared with those undergoing partial meniscectomy (relative risk [RR] 0.78, confidence interval [CI] 0.71-0.85, P < .001). Meniscus reoperation occurred significantly more in patients undergoing meniscal repair (RR 1.26, CI 1.17-1.35, P < .001) than those undergoing partial meniscectomy. Regarding total knee arthroplasty, partial meniscectomy carried a more than 6-fold increased risk compared with isolated ACL reconstruction (RR 6.4, CI 2.49-16.42, P < .001).

Conclusions: In patients with ACL injury, ACL reconstruction, and concurrent meniscus tear, those patients treated with meniscus repair were less likely to undergo revision surgery. In these patients, medial meniscal injuries were associated with ACL revision than lateral meniscal injury regardless of the method of treatment. When meniscus repair is performed, this is associated with lower rate of future total knee arthroplasty.

Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

在ACL重建后并发半月板撕裂的患者中,与半月板修复术相比,部分半月板切除术增加了ACL翻修手术的风险。
目的:比较同时伴有半月板和前交叉韧带撕裂的患者在重建前交叉韧带时翻修前交叉韧带重建、半月板再手术和全膝关节置换术(TKA)联合半月板部分切除术和半月板修复的比率。方法:查询TriNetX数据库中2000年1月1日后行ACL重建的患者,临床随访至少1年。本研究的入选标准是半月板部分切除、半月板修复或孤立前交叉韧带重建,且没有半月板损伤的患者。使用Python进行统计学分析,显著性阈值p < 0.05。结果:共随访39126例,平均随访时间5.02年。与半月板部分切除术患者相比,接受半月板修复的患者更不可能进行改良ACL重建(RR: 0.78, CI: 0.71-0.85, p < 0.001)。半月板修复患者的半月板再手术发生率显著高于其他患者(RR: 1.26, CI: 1.17-1.35, p =)。结论:在ACL损伤、ACL重建、并发半月板撕裂的患者中,半月板修复患者接受翻修手术的可能性较低。在这些患者中,内侧半月板损伤与ACL翻修相关,而外侧半月板损伤与治疗方法无关。当进行半月板修复时,这与未来全膝关节置换术的发生率较低有关。证据等级:III级回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信