{"title":"Patient characteristics and degrees of discontinuity of care in Danish general practice: a cohort study.","authors":"Ditte Elschner Rimestad, Peder Ahnfeldt-Mollerup, Troels Kristensen","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuity of care is crucial for effective health care, but patients often experience discontinuity of care. Understanding the patterns and associated patient characteristics can guide interventions to improve continuity of care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate longitudinal provider discontinuity of care to identify disparities in patient characteristics across degrees of discontinuity of care in Danish general practice.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Cohort study using data from all Danish general practice patients aged ≥12 years, who were alive between 2007 and 2018.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Logistic regression was employed to estimate discontinuity of care at level 0 versus: 1-2 shifts, 3-4 shifts, 5-6 shifts, 7-8 shifts, and ≥9 shifts. Five regression models were used to analyse the odds of different levels of discontinuity of care relative to demographic, regional, municipal, socioeconomic, and morbidity factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of males were likely to have lower levels of discontinuity of care than females; however, males in the subgroup with the most shifts had a higher likelihood of experiencing the highest level of discontinuity. Younger adults aged 25-44 years had a higher likelihood of moderate-to-high discontinuity of care compared to those aged 12-24 years, whereas older adults had a lower probability. Discontinuity of care was higher among residents of the Capital and Zealand Regions, and varied by municipality type - being lowest in intermediate areas and highest in peripheral and rural municipalities at the most severe levels. Individuals who were unemployed, those in the lower income quartiles, and those classified as being of 'other ethnicities' and single status had increased probability of discontinuity of care. Patients with lower or moderate-to-high morbidity were also more likely to experience discontinuity of care than patients with no chronic diseases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed disparities in discontinuity of care linked to lower socioeconomic status and higher morbidity, with varying odds by region, municipality type, age, and gender.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":"e509-e517"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0570","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Continuity of care is crucial for effective health care, but patients often experience discontinuity of care. Understanding the patterns and associated patient characteristics can guide interventions to improve continuity of care.
Aim: To investigate longitudinal provider discontinuity of care to identify disparities in patient characteristics across degrees of discontinuity of care in Danish general practice.
Design & setting: Cohort study using data from all Danish general practice patients aged ≥12 years, who were alive between 2007 and 2018.
Method: Logistic regression was employed to estimate discontinuity of care at level 0 versus: 1-2 shifts, 3-4 shifts, 5-6 shifts, 7-8 shifts, and ≥9 shifts. Five regression models were used to analyse the odds of different levels of discontinuity of care relative to demographic, regional, municipal, socioeconomic, and morbidity factors.
Results: The majority of males were likely to have lower levels of discontinuity of care than females; however, males in the subgroup with the most shifts had a higher likelihood of experiencing the highest level of discontinuity. Younger adults aged 25-44 years had a higher likelihood of moderate-to-high discontinuity of care compared to those aged 12-24 years, whereas older adults had a lower probability. Discontinuity of care was higher among residents of the Capital and Zealand Regions, and varied by municipality type - being lowest in intermediate areas and highest in peripheral and rural municipalities at the most severe levels. Individuals who were unemployed, those in the lower income quartiles, and those classified as being of 'other ethnicities' and single status had increased probability of discontinuity of care. Patients with lower or moderate-to-high morbidity were also more likely to experience discontinuity of care than patients with no chronic diseases.
Conclusion: This study revealed disparities in discontinuity of care linked to lower socioeconomic status and higher morbidity, with varying odds by region, municipality type, age, and gender.
背景:护理的连续性(COC)对有效的医疗保健至关重要,但患者经常遇到护理的不连续性。了解这些模式和相关的患者特征可以指导干预措施以改善COC。目的:本研究调查了纵向提供者护理中断(DCOC),并确定了丹麦全科医生在DCOC水平上的患者特征差异。设计和环境:我们使用了2007年至2018年丹麦所有12岁及以上的全科患者的队列数据。方法:采用Logistic回归来估计DCOC水平:0 vs 1-2、0 vs 3-4、0 vs 5-6、0 vs 7-8和0 vs 9+班次。采用五种回归模型分析DCOC水平与人口统计学、区域、城市、社会经济和发病因素的比值。结果:大多数男性可能具有较低的DCOC水平,而男性亚组具有最高DCOC水平的几率。与12-24岁的人相比,年轻人患中度至重度DCOC的可能性更高,而老年人的可能性较低。较高的DCOC与新西兰大区、首都大区和直辖市的居民有关。失业个体、其他种族、单身状态和低收入四分位数的人患DCOC的可能性增加。低发病率或中高发病率的患者也比无慢性疾病的患者面临更高的DCOC可能性。结论:本研究揭示了低社会经济地位、高发病率的DCOC患者的差异,以及基于教育程度、城市类型、年龄和性别的不同几率。
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide.
BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.