Comparing Outcomes Among Medicaid Home and Community-Based Service Users: Private Homes vs. Assisted Living Facilities.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Hyunjee Kim, Katherine Courchaine, Angela Senders, Clint Sergi, Hiroko H Dodge, R Tamara Konetzka
{"title":"Comparing Outcomes Among Medicaid Home and Community-Based Service Users: Private Homes vs. Assisted Living Facilities.","authors":"Hyunjee Kim, Katherine Courchaine, Angela Senders, Clint Sergi, Hiroko H Dodge, R Tamara Konetzka","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare outcomes of Medicaid home and community-based services (HCBS) users residing in a private home vs. in an assisted living facility among dually eligible individuals aged 65 or older.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>Medicaid HCBS occurred either in private homes or assisted living facilities in 883 counties in 39 states in the United States from 2016 to 2019. We used an instrumental variable (IV) approach to account for unmeasured factors that might confound the association between HCBS settings and outcomes. Our IV was the monthly proportion of HCBS users in a private home (vs. in an assisted living facility) in surrounding counties within the same state. We examined four outcomes: hospitalizations, emergency department visits, days at home, and Medicare spending.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>We used Medicare and Medicaid claims linked at the individual level. Our sample included dually eligible individuals aged 65 or older, enrolled in Medicare fee-for-service plans, who used HCBS either in a private home or an assisted living facility, between 2016 and 2019.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Our sample included 8,140,213 person-months from 383,607 individuals, of whom 85% lived at home and 15% in assisted living facilities. Compared to those in assisted living facilities, in-home HCBS users were 1.3 percentage points more likely to be hospitalized each month (95% CI: 0.8-1.8) and had 0.3 fewer days at home per month (95% CI: -0.4 to -0.1). In an analysis using a sample matched on observed person-months, HCBS users at home had higher likelihoods of hospitalizations and emergency department visits, fewer days at home, and higher Medicaid spending.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, in-home HCBS users were more likely to experience adverse health events than those in assisted living facilities, suggesting that policymakers should consider improving care for HCBS users in private homes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14643"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14643","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare outcomes of Medicaid home and community-based services (HCBS) users residing in a private home vs. in an assisted living facility among dually eligible individuals aged 65 or older.

Study setting and design: Medicaid HCBS occurred either in private homes or assisted living facilities in 883 counties in 39 states in the United States from 2016 to 2019. We used an instrumental variable (IV) approach to account for unmeasured factors that might confound the association between HCBS settings and outcomes. Our IV was the monthly proportion of HCBS users in a private home (vs. in an assisted living facility) in surrounding counties within the same state. We examined four outcomes: hospitalizations, emergency department visits, days at home, and Medicare spending.

Data sources and analytic sample: We used Medicare and Medicaid claims linked at the individual level. Our sample included dually eligible individuals aged 65 or older, enrolled in Medicare fee-for-service plans, who used HCBS either in a private home or an assisted living facility, between 2016 and 2019.

Principal findings: Our sample included 8,140,213 person-months from 383,607 individuals, of whom 85% lived at home and 15% in assisted living facilities. Compared to those in assisted living facilities, in-home HCBS users were 1.3 percentage points more likely to be hospitalized each month (95% CI: 0.8-1.8) and had 0.3 fewer days at home per month (95% CI: -0.4 to -0.1). In an analysis using a sample matched on observed person-months, HCBS users at home had higher likelihoods of hospitalizations and emergency department visits, fewer days at home, and higher Medicaid spending.

Conclusions: Overall, in-home HCBS users were more likely to experience adverse health events than those in assisted living facilities, suggesting that policymakers should consider improving care for HCBS users in private homes.

比较医疗补助家庭和社区服务用户的结果:私人家庭与辅助生活设施。
目的:比较医疗补助家庭和社区服务(HCBS)使用者在65岁或以上双重符合条件的个人中居住在私人家庭和辅助生活机构的结果。研究背景和设计:2016年至2019年,医疗补助HCBS发生在美国39个州883个县的私人住宅或辅助生活设施中。我们使用工具变量(IV)方法来解释可能混淆HCBS设置和结果之间关联的未测量因素。我们的IV是同一州内周边县私人住宅(相对于辅助生活设施)HCBS用户的每月比例。我们检查了四个结果:住院、急诊就诊、在家天数和医疗保险支出。数据来源和分析样本:我们在个人层面上使用医疗保险和医疗补助索赔。我们的样本包括在2016年至2019年期间在私人住宅或辅助生活设施使用HCBS的65岁或以上的双重符合条件的个人,他们参加了医疗保险服务收费计划。主要发现:我们的样本包括来自383,607个人的8,140,213人月,其中85%住在家里,15%住在辅助生活设施。与生活辅助设施中的患者相比,家中HCBS使用者每月住院的可能性高1.3个百分点(95%置信区间:0.8-1.8),每月在家的天数少0.3天(95%置信区间:-0.4至-0.1)。在一项与观察到的人月相匹配的样本分析中,在家使用HCBS的人住院和急诊就诊的可能性更高,在家的天数更少,医疗补助支出更高。结论:总体而言,家庭HCBS使用者比辅助生活设施使用者更容易发生不良健康事件,这表明决策者应考虑改善对私人家庭HCBS使用者的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信