{"title":"Optimal targeted therapy for multiple cancers based on contrastive Notch signaling networks.","authors":"Tamaki Wakamoto, Sungrim Seirin-Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.jtbi.2025.112143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over decades, cancer understanding has advanced significantly at molecular and cellular levels, leading to various therapies based on intra-/inter-cellular networks. Despite this, cancer still remains a leading cause of death globally. The Notch signaling pathway, a crucial intercellular network in many cancers, has been extensively studied and therapies targeting the Notch pathway also have been well-studied based on inhibiting various stages of Notch activation. Nonetheless, the unclear pathophysiological mechanisms of metastasis, responsible for about 90% of cancer deaths, complicate treatment development. For example, the role of Notch signaling varies between cancers; in non-small cell lung cancer, Notch1 and Notch2 exhibit opposing effects compared to their roles in embryonal brain tumors. This suggests that a single targeted therapy to Notch signaling could produce opposing effects in the metastatic state, necessitating a more careful selection of therapies. To address this, we considered a scenario involving multiple cancers with contrasting Notch signaling pathways. We developed two mathematical models and explored optimal targeted therapies for reducing cancer cells in the metastatic state of two types of cancers with these contrasting pathways. From the in silico tests of existing Notch-targeted therapies and newly suggested therapies in this study, we found that multiple cancers with contrasting Notch networks can be controlled by one common targeted signal network. Furthermore, combination therapies enhancing Notch production may be most effective in early-stage cancer, whereas cleavage therapies may prove more effective in late-stage cancer. We also found that the order of multiple targeted therapies significantly affects treatment effectiveness and should be a key consideration. Our study proposes that optimal treatment should take into account the cancer stage, with careful selection and sequencing of medication therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Biology","volume":" ","pages":"112143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Theoretical Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2025.112143","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Over decades, cancer understanding has advanced significantly at molecular and cellular levels, leading to various therapies based on intra-/inter-cellular networks. Despite this, cancer still remains a leading cause of death globally. The Notch signaling pathway, a crucial intercellular network in many cancers, has been extensively studied and therapies targeting the Notch pathway also have been well-studied based on inhibiting various stages of Notch activation. Nonetheless, the unclear pathophysiological mechanisms of metastasis, responsible for about 90% of cancer deaths, complicate treatment development. For example, the role of Notch signaling varies between cancers; in non-small cell lung cancer, Notch1 and Notch2 exhibit opposing effects compared to their roles in embryonal brain tumors. This suggests that a single targeted therapy to Notch signaling could produce opposing effects in the metastatic state, necessitating a more careful selection of therapies. To address this, we considered a scenario involving multiple cancers with contrasting Notch signaling pathways. We developed two mathematical models and explored optimal targeted therapies for reducing cancer cells in the metastatic state of two types of cancers with these contrasting pathways. From the in silico tests of existing Notch-targeted therapies and newly suggested therapies in this study, we found that multiple cancers with contrasting Notch networks can be controlled by one common targeted signal network. Furthermore, combination therapies enhancing Notch production may be most effective in early-stage cancer, whereas cleavage therapies may prove more effective in late-stage cancer. We also found that the order of multiple targeted therapies significantly affects treatment effectiveness and should be a key consideration. Our study proposes that optimal treatment should take into account the cancer stage, with careful selection and sequencing of medication therapies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Theoretical Biology is the leading forum for theoretical perspectives that give insight into biological processes. It covers a very wide range of topics and is of interest to biologists in many areas of research, including:
• Brain and Neuroscience
• Cancer Growth and Treatment
• Cell Biology
• Developmental Biology
• Ecology
• Evolution
• Immunology,
• Infectious and non-infectious Diseases,
• Mathematical, Computational, Biophysical and Statistical Modeling
• Microbiology, Molecular Biology, and Biochemistry
• Networks and Complex Systems
• Physiology
• Pharmacodynamics
• Animal Behavior and Game Theory
Acceptable papers are those that bear significant importance on the biology per se being presented, and not on the mathematical analysis. Papers that include some data or experimental material bearing on theory will be considered, including those that contain comparative study, statistical data analysis, mathematical proof, computer simulations, experiments, field observations, or even philosophical arguments, which are all methods to support or reject theoretical ideas. However, there should be a concerted effort to make papers intelligible to biologists in the chosen field.