{"title":"Attention to Rural Populations in Social Work Journals: Findings from a Scoping Review.","authors":"Qian Meng, Mel Gray","doi":"10.1080/26408066.2025.2505662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aimed to examine social work's scholarly attention to rural populations in a global context, given the paucity of rural social work literature in professional journals and earlier reviews showing the dominance of material emanating from the United States of America.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>The researchers used a scoping review of articles published in social work journals listed in the <i>Journal Citation Reports for the Social Science</i> (hereafter JCR) (<i>n</i> = 90) between 2009 and 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found 152 articles on rural social work published in 48 of the 90 JCR social work journals, 71% of which were research-based. Most publications came from the Asia-Pacific (<i>n</i> = 60), 25 of which were from China, followed by 61 from North America, including 58 from the USA and three from Canada, along with 18 from Africa and 10 from Europe and the UK. There were only three from South America, possibly due to the study's restriction to English-language journals. The main themes related to rural social work practice, health, professional issues, and context.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The paucity of publications on rural issues contributed to minimal understanding of the complexity and diversity of rural poverty. The findings revealed remarkable similarities in knowledge shaping rural social work practice worldwide, despite regional differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study suggested a consistent lack of focus on rural populations within the social work profession and underscored the importance of understanding and addressing pressing issues facing rural communities across diverse global contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":73742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","volume":" ","pages":"1-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2025.2505662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The study aimed to examine social work's scholarly attention to rural populations in a global context, given the paucity of rural social work literature in professional journals and earlier reviews showing the dominance of material emanating from the United States of America.
Materials and method: The researchers used a scoping review of articles published in social work journals listed in the Journal Citation Reports for the Social Science (hereafter JCR) (n = 90) between 2009 and 2024.
Results: The study found 152 articles on rural social work published in 48 of the 90 JCR social work journals, 71% of which were research-based. Most publications came from the Asia-Pacific (n = 60), 25 of which were from China, followed by 61 from North America, including 58 from the USA and three from Canada, along with 18 from Africa and 10 from Europe and the UK. There were only three from South America, possibly due to the study's restriction to English-language journals. The main themes related to rural social work practice, health, professional issues, and context.
Discussion: The paucity of publications on rural issues contributed to minimal understanding of the complexity and diversity of rural poverty. The findings revealed remarkable similarities in knowledge shaping rural social work practice worldwide, despite regional differences.
Conclusion: The study suggested a consistent lack of focus on rural populations within the social work profession and underscored the importance of understanding and addressing pressing issues facing rural communities across diverse global contexts.
目的:考虑到专业期刊上农村社会工作文献的缺乏和早期的评论显示来自美国的材料占主导地位,本研究旨在研究全球背景下社会工作对农村人口的学术关注。材料和方法:研究人员对2009年至2024年间发表在《Journal Citation Reports for The social Science》(以下简称JCR)社会工作期刊上的文章(n = 90)进行了范围审查。结果:研究发现,在90份JCR社会工作期刊中,有48份发表了152篇关于农村社会工作的文章,其中71%为研究性文章。大多数出版物来自亚太地区(n = 60),其中25份来自中国,其次是61份来自北美,其中58份来自美国,3份来自加拿大,还有18份来自非洲,10份来自欧洲和英国。只有三个来自南美洲,可能是由于该研究仅限于英语期刊。主要主题涉及农村社会工作实践、卫生、专业问题和背景。讨论:由于缺乏关于农村问题的出版物,人们对农村贫困问题的复杂性和多样性了解甚少。调查结果显示,尽管存在地区差异,但在塑造全球农村社会工作实践的知识方面存在显著的相似性。结论:该研究表明,社会工作专业一直缺乏对农村人口的关注,并强调了理解和解决全球不同背景下农村社区面临的紧迫问题的重要性。