Development and Validation of Ultrasound Hemodynamic-based Prediction Models for Acute Kidney Injury After Renal Transplantation.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Zi Hao Ni, Tian Ying Xing, Wei Hong Hou, Xin Yu Zhao, Yun Lu Tao, Fu Bo Zhou, Ying Qi Xing
{"title":"Development and Validation of Ultrasound Hemodynamic-based Prediction Models for Acute Kidney Injury After Renal Transplantation.","authors":"Zi Hao Ni, Tian Ying Xing, Wei Hong Hou, Xin Yu Zhao, Yun Lu Tao, Fu Bo Zhou, Ying Qi Xing","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.04.058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>Acute kidney injury (AKI) post-renal transplantation often has a poor prognosis. This study aimed to identify patients with elevated risks of AKI after kidney transplantation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 422 patients who underwent kidney transplants from January 2020 to April 2023. Participants from 2020 to 2022 were randomized to training group (n=261) and validation group 1 (n=113), and those in 2023, as validation group 2 (n=48). Risk factors were determined by employing logistic regression analysis alongside the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, making use of ultrasound hemodynamic, clinical, and laboratory information. Models for prediction were developed using logistic regression analysis and six machine-learning techniques. The evaluation of the logistic regression model encompassed its discrimination, calibration, and applicability in clinical settings, and a nomogram was created to illustrate the model. SHapley Additive exPlanations were used to explain and visualize the best of the six machine learning models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator combined with logistic regression identified and incorporated five risk factors into the predictive model. The logistic regression model (AUC=0.927 in the validation set 1; AUC=0.968 in the validation set 2) and the random forest model (AUC=0.946 in the validation set 1;AUC=0.996 in the validation set 2) showed good performance post-validation, with no significant difference in their predictive accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings can assist clinicians in the early identification of patients at high risk for AKI, allowing for timely interventions and potentially enhancing the prognosis following kidney transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.04.058","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: Acute kidney injury (AKI) post-renal transplantation often has a poor prognosis. This study aimed to identify patients with elevated risks of AKI after kidney transplantation.

Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 422 patients who underwent kidney transplants from January 2020 to April 2023. Participants from 2020 to 2022 were randomized to training group (n=261) and validation group 1 (n=113), and those in 2023, as validation group 2 (n=48). Risk factors were determined by employing logistic regression analysis alongside the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, making use of ultrasound hemodynamic, clinical, and laboratory information. Models for prediction were developed using logistic regression analysis and six machine-learning techniques. The evaluation of the logistic regression model encompassed its discrimination, calibration, and applicability in clinical settings, and a nomogram was created to illustrate the model. SHapley Additive exPlanations were used to explain and visualize the best of the six machine learning models.

Results: The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator combined with logistic regression identified and incorporated five risk factors into the predictive model. The logistic regression model (AUC=0.927 in the validation set 1; AUC=0.968 in the validation set 2) and the random forest model (AUC=0.946 in the validation set 1;AUC=0.996 in the validation set 2) showed good performance post-validation, with no significant difference in their predictive accuracy.

Conclusion: These findings can assist clinicians in the early identification of patients at high risk for AKI, allowing for timely interventions and potentially enhancing the prognosis following kidney transplantation.

基于超声血流动力学的肾移植后急性肾损伤预测模型的建立与验证。
理由和目的:肾移植后急性肾损伤(AKI)通常预后较差。本研究旨在确定肾移植后AKI风险升高的患者。材料与方法:对2020年1月至2023年4月422例肾移植患者进行回顾性分析。2020 - 2022年的参与者随机分为训练组(n=261)和验证组1 (n=113), 2023年的参与者随机分为验证组2 (n=48)。利用超声血流动力学、临床和实验室信息,利用最小绝对收缩和选择算子,采用logistic回归分析确定危险因素。使用逻辑回归分析和六种机器学习技术开发了预测模型。对逻辑回归模型的评估包括其鉴别、校准和在临床环境中的适用性,并创建了一个nomogram来说明该模型。SHapley加性解释用于解释和可视化六个机器学习模型中的最佳模型。结果:最小绝对收缩和选择算子结合逻辑回归识别并纳入五个风险因素到预测模型中。验证集1的logistic回归模型AUC=0.927;验证集2的AUC=0.968)和随机森林模型(验证集1的AUC=0.946,验证集2的AUC=0.996)验证后表现良好,预测准确率无显著差异。结论:这些发现可以帮助临床医生早期识别AKI高危患者,允许及时干预并可能改善肾移植后的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信