Jackie Todd, Gregory Manista, Lisa Nicholson, Tochukwu Ikpeze, Joyce Black, Thomas Koshy
{"title":"Assessment of Support Surface Integrity in the Acute Health Care Setting.","authors":"Jackie Todd, Gregory Manista, Lisa Nicholson, Tochukwu Ikpeze, Joyce Black, Thomas Koshy","doi":"10.1097/WON.0000000000001182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to analyze 1 year of data from ongoing assessments of support surface integrity in the acute care (ie, hospital) setting, to formulate recommendations for routine support surface assessment and replacement consideration.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Descriptive study.</p><p><strong>Subjects and setting: </strong>Data were collected from 85 acute care facilities located in urban, suburban, and rural locations across the United States. Facilities were either current or prospective customers of Medline Industries, LP from who voluntarily agreed to participate in a surface assessment program. Data were collected from January through December 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two trained individuals conducted each support surface inspection beginning with a visual inspection of the covering and zipper. Heavy staining or visible prompted an internal inspection of the surface. Finally, a compression test was conducted after which the surface was given a score of its integrity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evaluations of 5121 surfaces across 85 acute health facilities showed that 59% (n = 3021) required immediate replacement, and slightly less than one-third of support surfaces were deemed in good condition. The most common failure modes were holes, tears, and thinning. Staining appears to be a leading indicator for mattress failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Support surfaces commonly have warrantees of 10 years for manufacturing defects, but this should not be interpreted as the expected years of use. Health care institutions should implement regular inspection practices to identify damaged support surfaces and report them to the appropriate department for replacement. Contaminated surfaces pose an infection control risk, and failure of the physical properties of the support surface may impact pressure redistribution capabilities of the surface.</p>","PeriodicalId":49950,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing","volume":"52 3","pages":"181-189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000001182","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze 1 year of data from ongoing assessments of support surface integrity in the acute care (ie, hospital) setting, to formulate recommendations for routine support surface assessment and replacement consideration.
Design: Descriptive study.
Subjects and setting: Data were collected from 85 acute care facilities located in urban, suburban, and rural locations across the United States. Facilities were either current or prospective customers of Medline Industries, LP from who voluntarily agreed to participate in a surface assessment program. Data were collected from January through December 2019.
Methods: Two trained individuals conducted each support surface inspection beginning with a visual inspection of the covering and zipper. Heavy staining or visible prompted an internal inspection of the surface. Finally, a compression test was conducted after which the surface was given a score of its integrity.
Results: Evaluations of 5121 surfaces across 85 acute health facilities showed that 59% (n = 3021) required immediate replacement, and slightly less than one-third of support surfaces were deemed in good condition. The most common failure modes were holes, tears, and thinning. Staining appears to be a leading indicator for mattress failure.
Conclusions: Support surfaces commonly have warrantees of 10 years for manufacturing defects, but this should not be interpreted as the expected years of use. Health care institutions should implement regular inspection practices to identify damaged support surfaces and report them to the appropriate department for replacement. Contaminated surfaces pose an infection control risk, and failure of the physical properties of the support surface may impact pressure redistribution capabilities of the surface.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing (JWOCN), the official journal of the Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society™ (WOCN®), is the premier publication for wound, ostomy and continence practice and research. The Journal’s mission is to publish current best evidence and original research to guide the delivery of expert health care.
The WOCN Society is a professional nursing society which supports its members by promoting educational, clinical and research opportunities to advance the practice and guide the delivery of expert health care to individuals with wounds, ostomies and continence care needs.