Air permitting for colorado stationary sources in disproportionately impacted communities.

IF 2.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Nicholas Dummer, Cecilia Leoni, Emily Saldaña, Catherine Villa, Sergio Guerra, Cecilia Schroeder, Michael D'agostino, Breanna González
{"title":"Air permitting for colorado stationary sources in disproportionately impacted communities.","authors":"Nicholas Dummer, Cecilia Leoni, Emily Saldaña, Catherine Villa, Sergio Guerra, Cecilia Schroeder, Michael D'agostino, Breanna González","doi":"10.1080/10962247.2025.2502501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the air permitting process evolves, so have environmental justice (EJ) considerations in air permitting. EJ is the concept that everyone has a fundamental right to a healthy and safe environment, equal protection from environmental hazards, and meaningful opportunities to engage in decisions about the environment. Amidst several states' EJ-specific initiatives, Colorado's Air Pollution Control Division (APCD) has embraced, and become a national leader in, addressing EJ concerns through the stationary source permitting process. Colorado began this process by publishing internal Division guidance that required longer public comment periods and other enhanced public outreach for stationary sources submitting major New Source Review applications in specific communities. Today, Colorado has enacted new laws and regulations, including the Environmental Justice Act and Air Quality Regulation Number 3 that aim to address harmful air quality disparities in certain areas by requiring Environmental Justice Summaries, enhanced modeling, and source-specific monitoring, among other measures. With the goal of EJ in mind, the APCD has worked with several partners to establish a robust data set from which state permitting authorities can identify certain permit applications for facilities that are advised to conduct more extensive public engagement prior to the start of a project; a case study of enhanced engagement is included in this article. The Division is committed to reflecting on and developing new ways to advance EJ in air permitting in the state of Colorado.Implications StatementEnvironmental justice (EJ) in air permitting is a rapidly evolving area, requiring ongoing adaptation to regulatory frameworks, data availability, and community engagement practices. The Division has sought to integrate EJ considerations into permitting through the implementation of EJ Summaries, enhanced air quality modeling, and source-specific monitoring. However, significant challenges remain, including data limitations, the complexity of regulatory compliance, ensuring meaningful community participation, and addressing historical social and economic disparities. The recent release of Colorado EnviroScreen 2.0, which incorporates updated U.S. Census Bureau data and redefines certain census block groups as SVC and CIC, introduces additional challenges. These include the necessity of rulemaking to apply the updates, effectively communicating status changes to applicants, and adapting internal processes to account for the revised data.To address these challenges, the Division is committed to refining its approach by improving data transparency, enhancing communication with affected communities, and integrating lessons learned from other state agencies. Ongoing efforts to update and enhance Regulation 3 reflect a broader strategy to incorporate EJ principles into permitting decisions while maintaining regulatory clarity.A key component of this work is the ongoing dialogue between the Division and impacted communities. Through this process, the Division seeks to ensure that communities understand regulatory requirements and how to effectively participate in public comment opportunities. Simultaneously, these conversations inform the Division's decision-making processes, helping to refine policies that mitigate health and environmental disparities. The continued exchange of knowledge between regulators and communities will be essential in advancing a more equitable approach to air permitting in Colorado.</p>","PeriodicalId":49171,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2025.2502501","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the air permitting process evolves, so have environmental justice (EJ) considerations in air permitting. EJ is the concept that everyone has a fundamental right to a healthy and safe environment, equal protection from environmental hazards, and meaningful opportunities to engage in decisions about the environment. Amidst several states' EJ-specific initiatives, Colorado's Air Pollution Control Division (APCD) has embraced, and become a national leader in, addressing EJ concerns through the stationary source permitting process. Colorado began this process by publishing internal Division guidance that required longer public comment periods and other enhanced public outreach for stationary sources submitting major New Source Review applications in specific communities. Today, Colorado has enacted new laws and regulations, including the Environmental Justice Act and Air Quality Regulation Number 3 that aim to address harmful air quality disparities in certain areas by requiring Environmental Justice Summaries, enhanced modeling, and source-specific monitoring, among other measures. With the goal of EJ in mind, the APCD has worked with several partners to establish a robust data set from which state permitting authorities can identify certain permit applications for facilities that are advised to conduct more extensive public engagement prior to the start of a project; a case study of enhanced engagement is included in this article. The Division is committed to reflecting on and developing new ways to advance EJ in air permitting in the state of Colorado.Implications StatementEnvironmental justice (EJ) in air permitting is a rapidly evolving area, requiring ongoing adaptation to regulatory frameworks, data availability, and community engagement practices. The Division has sought to integrate EJ considerations into permitting through the implementation of EJ Summaries, enhanced air quality modeling, and source-specific monitoring. However, significant challenges remain, including data limitations, the complexity of regulatory compliance, ensuring meaningful community participation, and addressing historical social and economic disparities. The recent release of Colorado EnviroScreen 2.0, which incorporates updated U.S. Census Bureau data and redefines certain census block groups as SVC and CIC, introduces additional challenges. These include the necessity of rulemaking to apply the updates, effectively communicating status changes to applicants, and adapting internal processes to account for the revised data.To address these challenges, the Division is committed to refining its approach by improving data transparency, enhancing communication with affected communities, and integrating lessons learned from other state agencies. Ongoing efforts to update and enhance Regulation 3 reflect a broader strategy to incorporate EJ principles into permitting decisions while maintaining regulatory clarity.A key component of this work is the ongoing dialogue between the Division and impacted communities. Through this process, the Division seeks to ensure that communities understand regulatory requirements and how to effectively participate in public comment opportunities. Simultaneously, these conversations inform the Division's decision-making processes, helping to refine policies that mitigate health and environmental disparities. The continued exchange of knowledge between regulators and communities will be essential in advancing a more equitable approach to air permitting in Colorado.

空气许可科罗拉多州固定源不成比例地影响社区。
随着空气许可过程的发展,空气许可中的环境正义(EJ)考虑也在不断发展。EJ的概念是,人人都享有健康和安全环境的基本权利,享有免受环境危害的平等保护,享有参与环境决策的有意义的机会。在几个州针对EJ的倡议中,科罗拉多州的空气污染控制部门(APCD)已经接受并成为通过固定源许可程序解决EJ问题的全国领导者。科罗拉多州通过发布内部部门指南开始了这一进程,该指南要求更长时间的公众评论期,并加强了在特定社区提交主要新来源审查申请的固定来源的公共宣传。今天,科罗拉多州颁布了新的法律法规,包括《环境正义法》和《空气质量条例3号》,旨在通过要求环境正义总结、增强建模和特定源监测等措施,解决某些地区有害空气质量差异的问题。考虑到EJ的目标,APCD与几个合作伙伴合作建立了一个强大的数据集,州许可当局可以从中确定某些设施的许可申请,建议这些设施在项目开始前进行更广泛的公众参与;本文包括一个关于增强参与度的案例研究。该司致力于反思和开发新的方法,以推进空气中的EJ许可在科罗拉多州。影响声明空气许可中的环境正义(EJ)是一个快速发展的领域,需要不断适应监管框架、数据可用性和社区参与实践。该司通过实施环境污染摘要、加强空气质量模型和特定污染源监测,力求将环境污染考虑因素纳入许可。然而,重大挑战仍然存在,包括数据限制、法规遵从的复杂性、确保有意义的社区参与以及解决历史上的社会和经济差异。最近发布的Colorado EnviroScreen 2.0包含了最新的美国人口普查局数据,并将某些人口普查块群体重新定义为SVC和CIC,这带来了额外的挑战。其中包括规则制定的必要性,以应用更新,有效地与申请人沟通状态变化,以及调整内部流程以解释修改后的数据。为了应对这些挑战,该司致力于通过提高数据透明度、加强与受影响社区的沟通以及整合从其他国家机构吸取的经验教训来改进其方法。正在进行的更新和加强法规3的努力反映了一个更广泛的战略,即在保持监管清晰度的同时,将EJ原则纳入许可决策。这项工作的一个关键组成部分是该司与受影响社区之间正在进行的对话。通过这一流程,该司力求确保社群了解监管要求以及如何有效地参与公众评论机会。同时,这些对话为该司的决策过程提供了信息,有助于完善减轻健康和环境差异的政策。监管机构和社区之间的持续知识交流对于推进科罗拉多州空气许可的更公平方法至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.70%
发文量
95
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (J&AWMA) is one of the oldest continuously published, peer-reviewed, technical environmental journals in the world. First published in 1951 under the name Air Repair, J&AWMA is intended to serve those occupationally involved in air pollution control and waste management through the publication of timely and reliable information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信