Siyu Fu, Ruben G Boers, Joachim B Boers, Pam E van der Meeren, Jean Helmijr, Vanja de Weerd, Michail Doukas, Maurice Jansen, Bettina E Hansen, Roeland F de Wilde, Dave Sprengers, Joost Gribnau, Saskia M Wilting, José D Debes, Andre Boonstra
{"title":"Genome-Wide Methylation Sequencing to Identify DNA Methylation Markers for Early-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver and Blood.","authors":"Siyu Fu, Ruben G Boers, Joachim B Boers, Pam E van der Meeren, Jean Helmijr, Vanja de Weerd, Michail Doukas, Maurice Jansen, Bettina E Hansen, Roeland F de Wilde, Dave Sprengers, Joost Gribnau, Saskia M Wilting, José D Debes, Andre Boonstra","doi":"10.1186/s13046-025-03412-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with a poor 5-year survival mainly due to detection at late stages. Better non-invasive surveillance methods are needed to improve early detection and maximize survival. We performed a strict assessment of DNA methylation markers (DMMs) for HCC detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 385 samples from liver tissues and blood were analyzed. Genome-wide Methylated DNA sequencing (MeD-seq) was initially performed on 46 liver tissues, followed by the validation using quantitative methylation-specific PCR (qMSP) on 175 liver tissues. The selected DMMs with and without ASAP/GAAD score were further evaluated in 180 blood samples. Additionally, MeD-seq was performed to validate the results on blood.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MeD-seq revealed a substantial number of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in HCC tissues compared to non-HCC controls. By qMSP, the top 5 DMMs demonstrated strong performance in distinguishing cirrhotic HCC from cirrhosis controls in tissue (AUC 0.842 to 0.957). However, evaluation of these DMMs in blood showed lower performance in early HCC detection compared to cirrhosis in both the training (sensitivity 26.7-43.3%, 81.3% specificity) and validation cohorts (sensitivity 16.2-43.2%, 85.7% specificity). The addition of DMMs to the ASAP/GAAD score only provided an additional 5.4% sensitivity in the validation cohort compared to the ASAP/GAAD score alone. These findings were confirmed using MeD-seq analysis in blood samples, which revealed no detectable DMRs between cirrhotic HCC and cirrhosis controls. Interestingly, DNA methylation patterns in blood of healthy individuals differed strongly from both groups (cirrhosis and cirrhotic HCC).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DNA methylation patterns in liver tissue were distinctly different between HCC and controls. In blood, DMMs contributed minimally to early-stage HCC detection compared to cirrhosis, whether used alone or in combination with the ASAP/GAAD score. It is likely that high baseline DNA methylation related to cirrhosis and possibly the low input of tumor-related DNA impacts the use of DMMs in early HCC detection in blood.</p>","PeriodicalId":50199,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"44 1","pages":"144"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12079860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-025-03412-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with a poor 5-year survival mainly due to detection at late stages. Better non-invasive surveillance methods are needed to improve early detection and maximize survival. We performed a strict assessment of DNA methylation markers (DMMs) for HCC detection.
Methods: A total of 385 samples from liver tissues and blood were analyzed. Genome-wide Methylated DNA sequencing (MeD-seq) was initially performed on 46 liver tissues, followed by the validation using quantitative methylation-specific PCR (qMSP) on 175 liver tissues. The selected DMMs with and without ASAP/GAAD score were further evaluated in 180 blood samples. Additionally, MeD-seq was performed to validate the results on blood.
Results: MeD-seq revealed a substantial number of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in HCC tissues compared to non-HCC controls. By qMSP, the top 5 DMMs demonstrated strong performance in distinguishing cirrhotic HCC from cirrhosis controls in tissue (AUC 0.842 to 0.957). However, evaluation of these DMMs in blood showed lower performance in early HCC detection compared to cirrhosis in both the training (sensitivity 26.7-43.3%, 81.3% specificity) and validation cohorts (sensitivity 16.2-43.2%, 85.7% specificity). The addition of DMMs to the ASAP/GAAD score only provided an additional 5.4% sensitivity in the validation cohort compared to the ASAP/GAAD score alone. These findings were confirmed using MeD-seq analysis in blood samples, which revealed no detectable DMRs between cirrhotic HCC and cirrhosis controls. Interestingly, DNA methylation patterns in blood of healthy individuals differed strongly from both groups (cirrhosis and cirrhotic HCC).
Conclusion: DNA methylation patterns in liver tissue were distinctly different between HCC and controls. In blood, DMMs contributed minimally to early-stage HCC detection compared to cirrhosis, whether used alone or in combination with the ASAP/GAAD score. It is likely that high baseline DNA methylation related to cirrhosis and possibly the low input of tumor-related DNA impacts the use of DMMs in early HCC detection in blood.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research is an esteemed peer-reviewed publication that focuses on cancer research, encompassing everything from fundamental discoveries to practical applications.
We welcome submissions that showcase groundbreaking advancements in the field of cancer research, especially those that bridge the gap between laboratory findings and clinical implementation. Our goal is to foster a deeper understanding of cancer, improve prevention and detection strategies, facilitate accurate diagnosis, and enhance treatment options.
We are particularly interested in manuscripts that shed light on the mechanisms behind the development and progression of cancer, including metastasis. Additionally, we encourage submissions that explore molecular alterations or biomarkers that can help predict the efficacy of different treatments or identify drug resistance. Translational research related to targeted therapies, personalized medicine, tumor immunotherapy, and innovative approaches applicable to clinical investigations are also of great interest to us.
We provide a platform for the dissemination of large-scale molecular characterizations of human tumors and encourage researchers to share their insights, discoveries, and methodologies with the wider scientific community.
By publishing high-quality research articles, reviews, and commentaries, the Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research strives to contribute to the continuous improvement of cancer care and make a meaningful impact on patients' lives.