Genome-Wide Methylation Sequencing to Identify DNA Methylation Markers for Early-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver and Blood.

IF 11.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Siyu Fu, Ruben G Boers, Joachim B Boers, Pam E van der Meeren, Jean Helmijr, Vanja de Weerd, Michail Doukas, Maurice Jansen, Bettina E Hansen, Roeland F de Wilde, Dave Sprengers, Joost Gribnau, Saskia M Wilting, José D Debes, Andre Boonstra
{"title":"Genome-Wide Methylation Sequencing to Identify DNA Methylation Markers for Early-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver and Blood.","authors":"Siyu Fu, Ruben G Boers, Joachim B Boers, Pam E van der Meeren, Jean Helmijr, Vanja de Weerd, Michail Doukas, Maurice Jansen, Bettina E Hansen, Roeland F de Wilde, Dave Sprengers, Joost Gribnau, Saskia M Wilting, José D Debes, Andre Boonstra","doi":"10.1186/s13046-025-03412-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with a poor 5-year survival mainly due to detection at late stages. Better non-invasive surveillance methods are needed to improve early detection and maximize survival. We performed a strict assessment of DNA methylation markers (DMMs) for HCC detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 385 samples from liver tissues and blood were analyzed. Genome-wide Methylated DNA sequencing (MeD-seq) was initially performed on 46 liver tissues, followed by the validation using quantitative methylation-specific PCR (qMSP) on 175 liver tissues. The selected DMMs with and without ASAP/GAAD score were further evaluated in 180 blood samples. Additionally, MeD-seq was performed to validate the results on blood.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MeD-seq revealed a substantial number of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in HCC tissues compared to non-HCC controls. By qMSP, the top 5 DMMs demonstrated strong performance in distinguishing cirrhotic HCC from cirrhosis controls in tissue (AUC 0.842 to 0.957). However, evaluation of these DMMs in blood showed lower performance in early HCC detection compared to cirrhosis in both the training (sensitivity 26.7-43.3%, 81.3% specificity) and validation cohorts (sensitivity 16.2-43.2%, 85.7% specificity). The addition of DMMs to the ASAP/GAAD score only provided an additional 5.4% sensitivity in the validation cohort compared to the ASAP/GAAD score alone. These findings were confirmed using MeD-seq analysis in blood samples, which revealed no detectable DMRs between cirrhotic HCC and cirrhosis controls. Interestingly, DNA methylation patterns in blood of healthy individuals differed strongly from both groups (cirrhosis and cirrhotic HCC).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DNA methylation patterns in liver tissue were distinctly different between HCC and controls. In blood, DMMs contributed minimally to early-stage HCC detection compared to cirrhosis, whether used alone or in combination with the ASAP/GAAD score. It is likely that high baseline DNA methylation related to cirrhosis and possibly the low input of tumor-related DNA impacts the use of DMMs in early HCC detection in blood.</p>","PeriodicalId":50199,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"44 1","pages":"144"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12079860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-025-03412-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with a poor 5-year survival mainly due to detection at late stages. Better non-invasive surveillance methods are needed to improve early detection and maximize survival. We performed a strict assessment of DNA methylation markers (DMMs) for HCC detection.

Methods: A total of 385 samples from liver tissues and blood were analyzed. Genome-wide Methylated DNA sequencing (MeD-seq) was initially performed on 46 liver tissues, followed by the validation using quantitative methylation-specific PCR (qMSP) on 175 liver tissues. The selected DMMs with and without ASAP/GAAD score were further evaluated in 180 blood samples. Additionally, MeD-seq was performed to validate the results on blood.

Results: MeD-seq revealed a substantial number of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in HCC tissues compared to non-HCC controls. By qMSP, the top 5 DMMs demonstrated strong performance in distinguishing cirrhotic HCC from cirrhosis controls in tissue (AUC 0.842 to 0.957). However, evaluation of these DMMs in blood showed lower performance in early HCC detection compared to cirrhosis in both the training (sensitivity 26.7-43.3%, 81.3% specificity) and validation cohorts (sensitivity 16.2-43.2%, 85.7% specificity). The addition of DMMs to the ASAP/GAAD score only provided an additional 5.4% sensitivity in the validation cohort compared to the ASAP/GAAD score alone. These findings were confirmed using MeD-seq analysis in blood samples, which revealed no detectable DMRs between cirrhotic HCC and cirrhosis controls. Interestingly, DNA methylation patterns in blood of healthy individuals differed strongly from both groups (cirrhosis and cirrhotic HCC).

Conclusion: DNA methylation patterns in liver tissue were distinctly different between HCC and controls. In blood, DMMs contributed minimally to early-stage HCC detection compared to cirrhosis, whether used alone or in combination with the ASAP/GAAD score. It is likely that high baseline DNA methylation related to cirrhosis and possibly the low input of tumor-related DNA impacts the use of DMMs in early HCC detection in blood.

全基因组甲基化测序鉴定肝脏和血液中早期肝细胞癌的DNA甲基化标记。
背景:肝细胞癌(HCC)与较差的5年生存率相关,主要是由于晚期发现。需要更好的非侵入性监测方法来提高早期发现和最大限度地提高生存率。我们对用于HCC检测的DNA甲基化标记物(DMMs)进行了严格的评估。方法:对385例肝组织及血液标本进行分析。首先对46个肝组织进行了全基因组甲基化DNA测序(MeD-seq),随后对175个肝组织进行了定量甲基化特异性PCR (qMSP)验证。在180份血样中进一步评估有和没有ASAP/GAAD评分的DMMs。此外,进行MeD-seq以验证血液结果。结果:MeD-seq显示,与非HCC对照组相比,HCC组织中存在大量差异甲基化区域(DMRs)。通过qMSP,前5个DMMs在区分组织中肝硬化HCC和肝硬化对照组方面表现出很强的性能(AUC为0.842至0.957)。然而,与训练组(敏感性26.7-43.3%,81.3%特异性)和验证组(敏感性16.2-43.2%,85.7%特异性)相比,血液中这些DMMs在早期HCC检测中的表现较低。在验证队列中,与单独的ASAP/GAAD评分相比,在ASAP/GAAD评分中添加DMMs仅提供了5.4%的额外敏感性。这些发现通过血液样本的MeD-seq分析得到了证实,结果显示肝硬化HCC和肝硬化对照组之间没有检测到DMRs。有趣的是,健康个体血液中的DNA甲基化模式与两组(肝硬化和肝硬化HCC)有很大不同。结论:肝组织DNA甲基化模式在HCC和对照组之间存在明显差异。在血液中,与肝硬化相比,无论是单独使用还是与ASAP/GAAD评分联合使用,dmm对早期HCC检测的贡献最小。与肝硬化相关的高基线DNA甲基化和肿瘤相关DNA的低输入可能会影响dmm在血液中早期HCC检测中的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.20
自引率
1.80%
发文量
333
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research is an esteemed peer-reviewed publication that focuses on cancer research, encompassing everything from fundamental discoveries to practical applications. We welcome submissions that showcase groundbreaking advancements in the field of cancer research, especially those that bridge the gap between laboratory findings and clinical implementation. Our goal is to foster a deeper understanding of cancer, improve prevention and detection strategies, facilitate accurate diagnosis, and enhance treatment options. We are particularly interested in manuscripts that shed light on the mechanisms behind the development and progression of cancer, including metastasis. Additionally, we encourage submissions that explore molecular alterations or biomarkers that can help predict the efficacy of different treatments or identify drug resistance. Translational research related to targeted therapies, personalized medicine, tumor immunotherapy, and innovative approaches applicable to clinical investigations are also of great interest to us. We provide a platform for the dissemination of large-scale molecular characterizations of human tumors and encourage researchers to share their insights, discoveries, and methodologies with the wider scientific community. By publishing high-quality research articles, reviews, and commentaries, the Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research strives to contribute to the continuous improvement of cancer care and make a meaningful impact on patients' lives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信