Second-Look Ultrasound: When Things Are Not Always as They Seem.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ultrasound Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-05-13 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000715
Belén Úbeda, Eduard Mensión, Sergi Ganau, Carla Sitges, Miguel Macedo, Dominika Maria Gasior, Isaac Cebrecos, Esther Sanfeliu, Xavier Bargalló
{"title":"Second-Look Ultrasound: When Things Are Not Always as They Seem.","authors":"Belén Úbeda, Eduard Mensión, Sergi Ganau, Carla Sitges, Miguel Macedo, Dominika Maria Gasior, Isaac Cebrecos, Esther Sanfeliu, Xavier Bargalló","doi":"10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare size, morphologic features, and degree of suspicion between findings at second-look ultrasound (SL-US) and additional lesions with histological confirmation detected on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We performed an observational retrospective study including women who underwent SL-US between January 2021 and August 2022. Size, morphology according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon, and BI-RADS categories were analyzed for MRI and US findings. Two hundred twenty-four consecutive patients (aged 29-88 years; mean, 59.2 years) underwent SL-US to identify 235 additional lesions detected on MRI. US identified 173 (73.6%) findings. US- guided biopsy was performed in 148 (85.5%) of the detected lesions, proving 56 (37.8%) malignant and 92 (62.2%) benign. Mean size was 15.2 mm on MRI and 9.4 mm on US. Foci and masses showed good correlation, whereas nonmass enhancements tended to appear larger on MRI, and this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0001). Morphology showed a higher agreement in the case of foci and masses than with nonmass enhancements. BI-RADS categories agreed in 66 cases (44.6%), whereas in 61 cases (41.2%), the degree of suspicion was higher for MRI, and in only 21 cases (14.2%) were lesions more suspicious on US than on MRI. In conclusion, lesions detected at SL-US show a higher agreement in size and morphologic features for foci and masses than with nonmass enhancements and similar or lower degree of suspicion than on MRI; therefore, decision to perform a biopsy should be based primarily on MRI findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49116,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Quarterly","volume":"41 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000715","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to compare size, morphologic features, and degree of suspicion between findings at second-look ultrasound (SL-US) and additional lesions with histological confirmation detected on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We performed an observational retrospective study including women who underwent SL-US between January 2021 and August 2022. Size, morphology according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon, and BI-RADS categories were analyzed for MRI and US findings. Two hundred twenty-four consecutive patients (aged 29-88 years; mean, 59.2 years) underwent SL-US to identify 235 additional lesions detected on MRI. US identified 173 (73.6%) findings. US- guided biopsy was performed in 148 (85.5%) of the detected lesions, proving 56 (37.8%) malignant and 92 (62.2%) benign. Mean size was 15.2 mm on MRI and 9.4 mm on US. Foci and masses showed good correlation, whereas nonmass enhancements tended to appear larger on MRI, and this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0001). Morphology showed a higher agreement in the case of foci and masses than with nonmass enhancements. BI-RADS categories agreed in 66 cases (44.6%), whereas in 61 cases (41.2%), the degree of suspicion was higher for MRI, and in only 21 cases (14.2%) were lesions more suspicious on US than on MRI. In conclusion, lesions detected at SL-US show a higher agreement in size and morphologic features for foci and masses than with nonmass enhancements and similar or lower degree of suspicion than on MRI; therefore, decision to perform a biopsy should be based primarily on MRI findings.

二次超声检查:当事情并不总是像他们看起来的那样。
摘要:本研究的目的是比较乳腺超声(SL-US)检查结果与乳腺磁共振成像(MRI)检查组织学证实的其他病变的大小、形态学特征和怀疑程度。我们进行了一项观察性回顾性研究,纳入了2021年1月至2022年8月期间接受SL-US治疗的女性。根据乳腺成像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)词典分析大小、形态学,并分析BI-RADS分类的MRI和US检查结果。连续224例患者(年龄29-88岁;平均59.2岁)进行了SL-US,以确定MRI检测到的235个额外病变。美国确定了173个(73.6%)发现。超声引导下活检148例(85.5%),其中56例(37.8%)为恶性,92例(62.2%)为良性。MRI平均为15.2 mm, US平均为9.4 mm。病灶与肿块表现出良好的相关性,而非肿块增强在MRI上往往显得更大,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.0001)。形态学在病灶和肿块的情况下比非肿块增强的情况下表现出更高的一致性。66例(44.6%)BI-RADS分类一致,而61例(41.2%)MRI的怀疑程度更高,只有21例(14.2%)病变在US上比在MRI上更可疑。总之,与非肿块增强相比,SL-US检测到的病变在病灶和肿块的大小和形态学特征上表现出更高的一致性,并且与MRI相似或更低的怀疑程度;因此,活检的决定应主要基于MRI结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasound Quarterly
Ultrasound Quarterly RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ultrasound Quarterly provides coverage of the newest, most sophisticated ultrasound techniques as well as in-depth analysis of important developments in this dynamic field. The journal publishes reviews of a wide variety of topics including trans-vaginal ultrasonography, detection of fetal anomalies, color Doppler flow imaging, pediatric ultrasonography, and breast sonography. Official Journal of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信