Determining a capability framework and training requirements to support provision of physiotherapy via telehealth in an Australian public tertiary health setting: a multi-methods study.
Michelle Cottrell, Sarah Featherston, Kelsey Pateman
{"title":"Determining a capability framework and training requirements to support provision of physiotherapy via telehealth in an Australian public tertiary health setting: a multi-methods study.","authors":"Michelle Cottrell, Sarah Featherston, Kelsey Pateman","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2025.2498690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inadequate clinician training and support is a primary challenge to physiotherapists' adopting telehealth. Training must be underpinned by relevant capability frameworks and co-developed to meet the needs and preferences of the existing physiotherapy workforce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Establish a capability framework for delivery of care via telehealth and understand training requirements to achieve competency specifically for the publicly funded physiotherapy workforce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sequential multi-methods study design. Phase 1: Physiotherapists with telehealth experience participated in a 2-round e-Delphi process to establish consensus on core capability framework domains (Round 1, <i>n</i> = 29; Round 2, <i>n</i> = 26). Phase 2: Physiotherapists (<i>n</i> = 35) subsequently rated their current knowledge and confidence for each capability item. Phase 3: Participatory focus groups, involving physiotherapists (<i>n</i> = 37) from six facilities, identified theoretical and practical domains most relevant to local contexts via thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three capability items were produced across eight domains (Compliance, Patient privacy and confidentiality, Patient safety, Technology Skills, Telehealth Delivery, Assessment and Diagnosis, Care Planning and Management, Access and Equity). Knowledge and confidence were ranked lowest within the Technology Skills domain (% respondents reporting high levels of confidence = 28.6%-42.9%), and highest in Telehealth Delivery (% respondents reporting high levels of confidence = 54.2% -80%). Focus groups identified technology skills, risk management (patient safety) and superuser support as priority areas for training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physiotherapists identified additional local training competencies to compliment the 53-item capability framework. Adopting a sequential multi-methods and participatory approach successfully produced a training package framework suitable for implementation in a public outpatient setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"2130-2140"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2025.2498690","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Inadequate clinician training and support is a primary challenge to physiotherapists' adopting telehealth. Training must be underpinned by relevant capability frameworks and co-developed to meet the needs and preferences of the existing physiotherapy workforce.
Objective: Establish a capability framework for delivery of care via telehealth and understand training requirements to achieve competency specifically for the publicly funded physiotherapy workforce.
Methods: Sequential multi-methods study design. Phase 1: Physiotherapists with telehealth experience participated in a 2-round e-Delphi process to establish consensus on core capability framework domains (Round 1, n = 29; Round 2, n = 26). Phase 2: Physiotherapists (n = 35) subsequently rated their current knowledge and confidence for each capability item. Phase 3: Participatory focus groups, involving physiotherapists (n = 37) from six facilities, identified theoretical and practical domains most relevant to local contexts via thematic analysis.
Results: Fifty-three capability items were produced across eight domains (Compliance, Patient privacy and confidentiality, Patient safety, Technology Skills, Telehealth Delivery, Assessment and Diagnosis, Care Planning and Management, Access and Equity). Knowledge and confidence were ranked lowest within the Technology Skills domain (% respondents reporting high levels of confidence = 28.6%-42.9%), and highest in Telehealth Delivery (% respondents reporting high levels of confidence = 54.2% -80%). Focus groups identified technology skills, risk management (patient safety) and superuser support as priority areas for training.
Conclusion: Physiotherapists identified additional local training competencies to compliment the 53-item capability framework. Adopting a sequential multi-methods and participatory approach successfully produced a training package framework suitable for implementation in a public outpatient setting.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.