A novel stroke mimic prediction score during in-hospital triage for suspected stroke patients: The Stroke Mimics Score (SMS).

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Irene Scala, Marcello Covino, Pier Andrea Rizzo, Maurizio Bisegna, Davide Marchese, Simone Bellavia, Aldobrando Broccolini, Riccardo Di Iorio, Giacomo Della Marca, Valerio Brunetti, Francesco Franceschi, Mauro Monforte, Paolo Calabresi, Giovanni Frisullo
{"title":"A novel stroke mimic prediction score during in-hospital triage for suspected stroke patients: The Stroke Mimics Score (SMS).","authors":"Irene Scala, Marcello Covino, Pier Andrea Rizzo, Maurizio Bisegna, Davide Marchese, Simone Bellavia, Aldobrando Broccolini, Riccardo Di Iorio, Giacomo Della Marca, Valerio Brunetti, Francesco Franceschi, Mauro Monforte, Paolo Calabresi, Giovanni Frisullo","doi":"10.1177/23969873251338654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early differential diagnosis between stroke mimics and cerebrovascular events is a major challenge in the Emergency Department (ED). The primary aim of this study was to identify diagnostic predictors of stroke mimics based on parameters acquired during the ED triage of patients with suspected stroke. Secondly, we aimed to develop a diagnostic score for early differential diagnosis. Moreover, we compared the diagnostic accuracy of our score with that of other two validated scores.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We included consecutive patients presenting to the ED of an urban teaching hospital for suspected stroke from 2015 to 2022 in the retrospective derivation cohort and during 2023 in the prospective validation cohort. Cerebrovascular events predictors were identified by logistic regression and were used to develop the Stroke Mimics Score (SMS). The diagnostic performance of SMS was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUROC) and the comparison with other diagnostic scores (FABS - Facial droop, Atrial fibrillation, Age, Systolic blood pressure, Seizure, Sensory symptoms- and TMS- TeleStroke Mimic score) was performed through DeLong method and Net Reclassification Index (NRI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 8648 patients were included in the study, 6998 in the retrospective cohort, and 1650 in the prospective cohort. In the retrospective cohort, 3266 (46.7%) patients had a final diagnosis of stroke mimic. Several variables collected by triage nurses independently predicted cerebrovascular event over stroke mimic diagnosis. The 10-variable SMS had excellent diagnostic performance in both the derivation and validation cohorts [AUROC 0.777 (95% CI: 0.766-0.788) and 0.774 (95% CI: 0.752-0.797), respectively] and outperformed FABS and TMS in all statistical comparisons.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Several clinical variables elicited by triage nurses in the ED help to differentiate cerebrovascular events from stroke mimics in suspected stroke patients. The SMS is an easy-to-use score that could help selecting the best pathway for such patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":" ","pages":"23969873251338654"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12084216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Stroke Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873251338654","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Early differential diagnosis between stroke mimics and cerebrovascular events is a major challenge in the Emergency Department (ED). The primary aim of this study was to identify diagnostic predictors of stroke mimics based on parameters acquired during the ED triage of patients with suspected stroke. Secondly, we aimed to develop a diagnostic score for early differential diagnosis. Moreover, we compared the diagnostic accuracy of our score with that of other two validated scores.

Patients and methods: We included consecutive patients presenting to the ED of an urban teaching hospital for suspected stroke from 2015 to 2022 in the retrospective derivation cohort and during 2023 in the prospective validation cohort. Cerebrovascular events predictors were identified by logistic regression and were used to develop the Stroke Mimics Score (SMS). The diagnostic performance of SMS was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUROC) and the comparison with other diagnostic scores (FABS - Facial droop, Atrial fibrillation, Age, Systolic blood pressure, Seizure, Sensory symptoms- and TMS- TeleStroke Mimic score) was performed through DeLong method and Net Reclassification Index (NRI).

Results: About 8648 patients were included in the study, 6998 in the retrospective cohort, and 1650 in the prospective cohort. In the retrospective cohort, 3266 (46.7%) patients had a final diagnosis of stroke mimic. Several variables collected by triage nurses independently predicted cerebrovascular event over stroke mimic diagnosis. The 10-variable SMS had excellent diagnostic performance in both the derivation and validation cohorts [AUROC 0.777 (95% CI: 0.766-0.788) and 0.774 (95% CI: 0.752-0.797), respectively] and outperformed FABS and TMS in all statistical comparisons.

Discussion and conclusion: Several clinical variables elicited by triage nurses in the ED help to differentiate cerebrovascular events from stroke mimics in suspected stroke patients. The SMS is an easy-to-use score that could help selecting the best pathway for such patients.

一种新颖的中风模拟预测评分在院内分流怀疑中风患者:中风模拟评分(SMS)。
早期鉴别诊断模拟脑卒中和脑血管事件是急诊科(ED)面临的主要挑战。本研究的主要目的是根据疑似中风患者在急诊科分诊过程中获得的参数,确定中风模拟的诊断预测因素。其次,我们的目标是开发一个早期鉴别诊断的诊断评分。此外,我们比较了我们的评分与其他两个有效评分的诊断准确性。患者和方法:我们纳入了2015年至2022年在一家城市教学医院急诊室就诊的疑似卒中患者,这是回顾性衍生队列,而在2023年期间,这是前瞻性验证队列。脑血管事件预测因子通过逻辑回归确定,并用于制定卒中模拟评分(SMS)。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)评价SMS的诊断效果,并通过DeLong法和净重分类指数(NRI)与其他诊断评分(FABS -面部下垂、心房颤动、年龄、收缩压、癫痫发作、感觉症状和TMS-脑卒中模拟评分)进行比较。结果:共纳入8648例患者,其中回顾性队列6998例,前瞻性队列1650例。在回顾性队列中,3266例(46.7%)患者最终诊断为卒中模拟。分诊护士收集的几个变量独立预测脑卒中模拟诊断中的脑血管事件。10变量SMS在推导和验证队列中都具有出色的诊断性能[AUROC分别为0.777 (95% CI: 0.766-0.788)和0.774 (95% CI: 0.752-0.797)],在所有统计比较中都优于FABS和TMS。讨论与结论:在急诊科,由分诊护士引出的几个临床变量有助于区分疑似脑卒中患者的脑血管事件和脑卒中模拟事件。SMS是一种易于使用的评分方法,可以帮助这些患者选择最佳的治疗途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.60%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Launched in 2016 the European Stroke Journal (ESJ) is the official journal of the European Stroke Organisation (ESO), a professional non-profit organization with over 1,400 individual members, and affiliations to numerous related national and international societies. ESJ covers clinical stroke research from all fields, including clinical trials, epidemiology, primary and secondary prevention, diagnosis, acute and post-acute management, guidelines, translation of experimental findings into clinical practice, rehabilitation, organisation of stroke care, and societal impact. It is open to authors from all relevant medical and health professions. Article types include review articles, original research, protocols, guidelines, editorials and letters to the Editor. Through ESJ, authors and researchers have gained a new platform for the rapid and professional publication of peer reviewed scientific material of the highest standards; publication in ESJ is highly competitive. The journal and its editorial team has developed excellent cooperation with sister organisations such as the World Stroke Organisation and the International Journal of Stroke, and the American Heart Organization/American Stroke Association and the journal Stroke. ESJ is fully peer-reviewed and is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Issues are published 4 times a year (March, June, September and December) and articles are published OnlineFirst prior to issue publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信