A critical examination of 'family' caregiving at the end of life in contexts of homelessness: Key concepts and future considerations.

IF 2.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2025-05-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524251336765
Ashley Mollison, Kelli I Stajduhar, Marilou Gagnon, Ryan McNeil
{"title":"A critical examination of 'family' caregiving at the end of life in contexts of homelessness: Key concepts and future considerations.","authors":"Ashley Mollison, Kelli I Stajduhar, Marilou Gagnon, Ryan McNeil","doi":"10.1177/26323524251336765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identifying and addressing inequities in palliative care is an area of growing interest and importance. In this critical essay, we aim to challenge embedded assumptions about 'family' caregiving in white, Western systems (e.g. that of the nuclear family as carers) and focus on how the social determinants of health (SDOH; e.g. income and social protection, housing, education, food security) affect access to, and quality of, care at the end of life. More specifically, our analysis pays attention to what shapes the SDOH themselves including how racism, classism, heterosexism, and ableism become embedded and sustained in health and social institutions including palliative care. We begin by providing a brief discussion of the study of 'family' including the nuclear family standard and fictive kinship as an 'alternative' family form. Next, we focus on fictive kinship in two diverse populations - (1) street-involved youth who form street families; and (2) older adults who access care beyond nuclear families - that challenge embedded assumptions and help set a foundation for thinking about family and caregiving in contexts of inequities. Drawing on short vignettes, we then focus on emerging issues in palliative care and 'family' caregiving in contexts of homelessness and housing vulnerability. These issues include how caregivers in contexts of homelessness are, themselves, facing structural vulnerability; bio-legal family estrangement, reunification, and privileging; and how community service workers are filling both formal and informal caregiving roles. We conclude by delineating ongoing questions, research and practice gaps, and suggestions for future research in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":"19 ","pages":"26323524251336765"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12075969/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524251336765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identifying and addressing inequities in palliative care is an area of growing interest and importance. In this critical essay, we aim to challenge embedded assumptions about 'family' caregiving in white, Western systems (e.g. that of the nuclear family as carers) and focus on how the social determinants of health (SDOH; e.g. income and social protection, housing, education, food security) affect access to, and quality of, care at the end of life. More specifically, our analysis pays attention to what shapes the SDOH themselves including how racism, classism, heterosexism, and ableism become embedded and sustained in health and social institutions including palliative care. We begin by providing a brief discussion of the study of 'family' including the nuclear family standard and fictive kinship as an 'alternative' family form. Next, we focus on fictive kinship in two diverse populations - (1) street-involved youth who form street families; and (2) older adults who access care beyond nuclear families - that challenge embedded assumptions and help set a foundation for thinking about family and caregiving in contexts of inequities. Drawing on short vignettes, we then focus on emerging issues in palliative care and 'family' caregiving in contexts of homelessness and housing vulnerability. These issues include how caregivers in contexts of homelessness are, themselves, facing structural vulnerability; bio-legal family estrangement, reunification, and privileging; and how community service workers are filling both formal and informal caregiving roles. We conclude by delineating ongoing questions, research and practice gaps, and suggestions for future research in this area.

在无家可归的情况下,对生命结束时的“家庭”护理进行批判性检查:关键概念和未来考虑。
确定和解决姑息治疗中的不公平现象是一个日益受到关注和重视的领域。在这篇批判性的文章中,我们的目标是挑战关于“家庭”护理在白人西方系统中的嵌入假设(例如,核心家庭作为照顾者),并关注健康的社会决定因素(SDOH;例如,收入和社会保护、住房、教育、粮食安全)会影响生命末期获得护理的机会和质量。更具体地说,我们的分析关注了是什么塑造了SDOH本身,包括种族主义、阶级歧视、异性恋歧视和残疾歧视如何在包括姑息治疗在内的卫生和社会机构中根深蒂固并持续存在。我们首先简要讨论了“家庭”的研究,包括核心家庭标准和作为“替代”家庭形式的虚拟亲属关系。接下来,我们将重点放在两个不同人群中的虚拟亲属关系上——(1)形成街头家庭的街头青年;(2)获得核心家庭以外护理的老年人——这挑战了固有的假设,并为在不平等的背景下思考家庭和护理奠定了基础。然后,我们将重点关注无家可归和住房脆弱性背景下姑息治疗和“家庭”护理中的新问题。这些问题包括无家可归者的照料者自身如何面临结构性脆弱性;生法上的家庭隔阂、团聚和特权;以及社区服务工作者如何同时扮演正式和非正式的看护角色。最后,我们描述了正在进行的问题、研究和实践差距,以及对该领域未来研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信