A standardized technique for laparoscopic total colectomy in acute severe ulcerative colitis: a technical note.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Carlo Alberto Manzo, Caterina Baldi, Leonardo Lorusso, Valerio Celentano, Gianluca Matteo Sampietro
{"title":"A standardized technique for laparoscopic total colectomy in acute severe ulcerative colitis: a technical note.","authors":"Carlo Alberto Manzo, Caterina Baldi, Leonardo Lorusso, Valerio Celentano, Gianluca Matteo Sampietro","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02247-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ulcerative colitis (UC) often necessitates total colectomy in cases of medically refractory disease or complications, with over one-third of patients undergoing surgery despite advances in medical therapy. Standardization in colectomy techniques is crucial to improving surgical outcomes, enhancing reproducibility, and addressing variability in practices. This study revisits laparoscopic total colectomy, emphasizing a \"critical view of safety\" approach to streamline the procedure, reduce anatomical disorientation, and overcome steep learning curves for trainees. The proposed technique divides the procedure into two phases: left colectomy and right/transverse colectomy, each featuring five standardized critical views. These views provide a clear framework for key anatomical landmarks, including the pancreas, splenic hilum, Gerota's fascia, and middle colic vessels. Patient positioning and trocar placement are also standardized to ensure procedural consistency. The adoption of this refined, minimally invasive approach aligns with ECCO guidelines, offering advantages, such as fewer perioperative complications, shorter hospital stays, and preserved fertility. This method minimizes inter-surgeon variability, facilitating reproducibility in elective and emergency settings. Collaborative multi-disciplinary care among surgeons, gastroenterologists, and specialized nurses further supports timely surgical decision-making and improved post-operative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02247-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ulcerative colitis (UC) often necessitates total colectomy in cases of medically refractory disease or complications, with over one-third of patients undergoing surgery despite advances in medical therapy. Standardization in colectomy techniques is crucial to improving surgical outcomes, enhancing reproducibility, and addressing variability in practices. This study revisits laparoscopic total colectomy, emphasizing a "critical view of safety" approach to streamline the procedure, reduce anatomical disorientation, and overcome steep learning curves for trainees. The proposed technique divides the procedure into two phases: left colectomy and right/transverse colectomy, each featuring five standardized critical views. These views provide a clear framework for key anatomical landmarks, including the pancreas, splenic hilum, Gerota's fascia, and middle colic vessels. Patient positioning and trocar placement are also standardized to ensure procedural consistency. The adoption of this refined, minimally invasive approach aligns with ECCO guidelines, offering advantages, such as fewer perioperative complications, shorter hospital stays, and preserved fertility. This method minimizes inter-surgeon variability, facilitating reproducibility in elective and emergency settings. Collaborative multi-disciplinary care among surgeons, gastroenterologists, and specialized nurses further supports timely surgical decision-making and improved post-operative outcomes.

急性严重溃疡性结肠炎腹腔镜全结肠切除术的标准化技术:技术说明。
溃疡性结肠炎(UC)通常需要在医学上难治性疾病或并发症的情况下进行全结肠切除术,尽管医学治疗取得了进展,但仍有超过三分之一的患者接受手术治疗。结肠切除术技术的标准化对于改善手术结果、提高可重复性和解决实践中的变异性至关重要。本研究回顾了腹腔镜全结肠切除术,强调了“安全的批判性观点”,以简化手术流程,减少解剖定向障碍,并克服学员陡峭的学习曲线。建议的技术将手术分为两个阶段:左结肠切除术和右/横结肠切除术,每个阶段都有五个标准化的关键视图。这些图像为关键解剖标志提供了清晰的框架,包括胰腺、脾门、Gerota’s筋膜和中结肠血管。患者体位和套管针放置也标准化,以确保程序的一致性。采用这种改良的微创入路符合ECCO指南,具有围手术期并发症少、住院时间短和保留生育能力等优点。这种方法最大限度地减少了外科医生之间的差异,促进了选择性和紧急情况下的重复性。外科医生、胃肠病学家和专业护士之间的多学科合作护理进一步支持及时的手术决策和改善术后预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信