The most used methods for evaluating health information technology systems usability. A scoping review.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Fatemeh Abareshi, Farid Zand, Roxana Sharifian, Alireza Choobineh
{"title":"The most used methods for evaluating health information technology systems usability. A scoping review.","authors":"Fatemeh Abareshi, Farid Zand, Roxana Sharifian, Alireza Choobineh","doi":"10.1177/10519815251333406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundHealth Information Technology (HIT) systems have become integral to today's health care. However, the success of such systems depends much on their usability because poor usability invites more errors and cognitive loads, ultimately affecting healthcare workers' efficiency and well-being.ObjectivesTo identify and summarize the most applied methods of HIT system evaluation, focusing on their impact on work environments and ergonomic practices.MethodsA scoping review of the literature available from January 2000 up to April 2024 was carried out. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist (PRISMA-ScR) was used. Searches were conducted in four databases. Literature was considered for inclusion if it focused on the HIT, provided information related to the usability of these systems, and provided empirical results of the usability testing. It was written in English.ResultsA total of 591 articles were initially retrieved. Manual searches of reference lists added 21 more articles. Ultimately, 48 articles met the inclusion criteria. The most used method for usability testing was the self-response category.ConclusionsWhile qualitative and quantitative methods have been used for usability testing, physiological methods remain underutilized. Eye tracking appeared in only a few studies, and its relationship to usability is still unclear. This study highlights the need to integrate ergonomic principles into HIT system design to enhance usability and support healthcare professional working conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10519815251333406"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815251333406","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundHealth Information Technology (HIT) systems have become integral to today's health care. However, the success of such systems depends much on their usability because poor usability invites more errors and cognitive loads, ultimately affecting healthcare workers' efficiency and well-being.ObjectivesTo identify and summarize the most applied methods of HIT system evaluation, focusing on their impact on work environments and ergonomic practices.MethodsA scoping review of the literature available from January 2000 up to April 2024 was carried out. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist (PRISMA-ScR) was used. Searches were conducted in four databases. Literature was considered for inclusion if it focused on the HIT, provided information related to the usability of these systems, and provided empirical results of the usability testing. It was written in English.ResultsA total of 591 articles were initially retrieved. Manual searches of reference lists added 21 more articles. Ultimately, 48 articles met the inclusion criteria. The most used method for usability testing was the self-response category.ConclusionsWhile qualitative and quantitative methods have been used for usability testing, physiological methods remain underutilized. Eye tracking appeared in only a few studies, and its relationship to usability is still unclear. This study highlights the need to integrate ergonomic principles into HIT system design to enhance usability and support healthcare professional working conditions.

评估卫生信息技术系统可用性最常用的方法。范围审查。
卫生信息技术(HIT)系统已成为当今卫生保健不可或缺的一部分。然而,这些系统的成功很大程度上取决于它们的可用性,因为糟糕的可用性会导致更多的错误和认知负荷,最终影响医护人员的效率和福祉。目的识别和总结最常用的HIT系统评估方法,重点关注它们对工作环境和人体工程学实践的影响。方法对2000年1月至2024年4月的文献进行回顾性分析。使用了系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目扩展范围评价清单(PRISMA-ScR)。在四个数据库中进行了搜索。如果文献关注HIT,提供与这些系统的可用性相关的信息,并提供可用性测试的实证结果,则考虑纳入。它是用英语写的。结果共检索到591篇文献。手工搜索参考书目增加了21篇文章。最终,48篇文章符合纳入标准。可用性测试最常用的方法是自我反应类别。虽然定性和定量方法已被用于可用性测试,但生理方法仍未得到充分利用。眼动追踪只出现在少数研究中,其与可用性的关系尚不清楚。这项研究强调了将人体工程学原理整合到HIT系统设计中的必要性,以提高可用性并支持医疗保健专业人员的工作条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
30.40%
发文量
739
期刊介绍: WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation is an interdisciplinary, international journal which publishes high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts covering the entire scope of the occupation of work. The journal''s subtitle has been deliberately laid out: The first goal is the prevention of illness, injury, and disability. When this goal is not achievable, the attention focuses on assessment to design client-centered intervention, rehabilitation, treatment, or controls that use scientific evidence to support best practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信