Companion Diagnostic FDA Review Flexibilities: An Assessment of CDx for NSCLC to Support Aligned Approaches for Validation.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Hillary S Andrews, Grace Collins, Bernat Navarro-Serer, Mark D Stewart, Jeff D Allen
{"title":"Companion Diagnostic FDA Review Flexibilities: An Assessment of CDx for NSCLC to Support Aligned Approaches for Validation.","authors":"Hillary S Andrews, Grace Collins, Bernat Navarro-Serer, Mark D Stewart, Jeff D Allen","doi":"10.1007/s43441-025-00799-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends concurrent development of targeted therapies with an associated companion diagnostic (CDx) as the optimal approach to provide patient access to novel, safe, and effective treatments. However, CDx validation often relies on clinical samples from pivotal clinical trials for the drug, which can be challenging, particularly when there is limited sample availability. A review of Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data (SSED) documents for CDx approved for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) revealed that CDx for rare biomarkers often use alternative samples for validation. While the practice of using alternative samples for validation occurs, it is not always clear when these flexibilities are considered or how alternative samples should be used for validation. To address this, we propose the FDA establish guidance for the use of alternative sample sources for CDx validation, especially for rare biomarkers, to ensure timely and effective patient access to targeted therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00799-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends concurrent development of targeted therapies with an associated companion diagnostic (CDx) as the optimal approach to provide patient access to novel, safe, and effective treatments. However, CDx validation often relies on clinical samples from pivotal clinical trials for the drug, which can be challenging, particularly when there is limited sample availability. A review of Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data (SSED) documents for CDx approved for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) revealed that CDx for rare biomarkers often use alternative samples for validation. While the practice of using alternative samples for validation occurs, it is not always clear when these flexibilities are considered or how alternative samples should be used for validation. To address this, we propose the FDA establish guidance for the use of alternative sample sources for CDx validation, especially for rare biomarkers, to ensure timely and effective patient access to targeted therapies.

伴随诊断FDA审查灵活性:对非小细胞肺癌CDx的评估,以支持对齐方法的验证。
美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)建议同时开发靶向治疗和相关的伴随诊断(CDx),作为为患者提供新颖、安全、有效治疗的最佳途径。然而,CDx验证通常依赖于药物关键临床试验的临床样本,这可能具有挑战性,特别是在样本可用性有限的情况下。一项对CDx用于非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的安全性和有效性总结(sed)文件的回顾显示,用于罕见生物标志物的CDx通常使用替代样品进行验证。虽然使用替代样本进行验证的做法时有发生,但并不总是清楚何时考虑这些灵活性,或者如何使用替代样本进行验证。为了解决这个问题,我们建议FDA为CDx验证的替代样品来源的使用制定指南,特别是对于罕见的生物标志物,以确保患者及时有效地获得靶向治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信