Allyship in Healthcare for People With Learning Disabilities as a Praxis of Respect, Attention and Collaborative Action.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Bojana Daw Srdanovic
{"title":"Allyship in Healthcare for People With Learning Disabilities as a Praxis of Respect, Attention and Collaborative Action.","authors":"Bojana Daw Srdanovic","doi":"10.1111/1467-9566.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a dearth of literature focusing on how allyship in health may be enacted in relation to people with learning disabilities (LD). This is concerning, because people with LD are vulnerable to health inequalities and forms of medical dehumanisation including do-not-resuscitate orders, diagnostic overshadowing and overprescription of psychotropic drugs. Deploying critical disability studies as a lens through which to understand disability, this paper reviews models of disability allyship developed in healthcare, research and theatre. In doing so it advocates transformative allyship as a model that can both animate action in support of people with learning disabilities and accommodate the involvement of others, including clinicians, carers and relatives, without compromising the all-important commitment to supporting disability cultures. The paper presents and analyses ethnographic data gained through observations of eleven healthcare appointments between seven clinicians and five patients with LD, undertaken as part of the ESRC-funded study Humanising Healthcare. It documents the potential of transformative allyship in healthcare to transform harmful disablist practices through emphasising respect, attention and collaborative action while also noting that broader structural conditions and diagnostic technologies limit the extent to which clinicians can enact transformative allyship.</p>","PeriodicalId":21685,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of health & illness","volume":"47 4","pages":"e70047"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12077749/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of health & illness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.70047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a dearth of literature focusing on how allyship in health may be enacted in relation to people with learning disabilities (LD). This is concerning, because people with LD are vulnerable to health inequalities and forms of medical dehumanisation including do-not-resuscitate orders, diagnostic overshadowing and overprescription of psychotropic drugs. Deploying critical disability studies as a lens through which to understand disability, this paper reviews models of disability allyship developed in healthcare, research and theatre. In doing so it advocates transformative allyship as a model that can both animate action in support of people with learning disabilities and accommodate the involvement of others, including clinicians, carers and relatives, without compromising the all-important commitment to supporting disability cultures. The paper presents and analyses ethnographic data gained through observations of eleven healthcare appointments between seven clinicians and five patients with LD, undertaken as part of the ESRC-funded study Humanising Healthcare. It documents the potential of transformative allyship in healthcare to transform harmful disablist practices through emphasising respect, attention and collaborative action while also noting that broader structural conditions and diagnostic technologies limit the extent to which clinicians can enact transformative allyship.

作为尊重、关注和协作行动的实践,在学习障碍者医疗保健中的盟友关系。
关于如何在与学习障碍(LD)相关的人群中制定健康联盟的文献缺乏。这是令人担忧的,因为患有残疾的人很容易受到保健不平等和各种形式的医疗非人化的影响,包括不抢救命令、诊断上的阴影和精神药物的过度处方。利用关键的残疾研究作为理解残疾的一个镜头,本文回顾了在医疗保健、研究和剧院中发展起来的残疾联盟模型。在这样做的过程中,它倡导变革的联盟作为一种模式,既可以推动支持学习障碍者的行动,也可以容纳其他人的参与,包括临床医生、护理人员和亲属,而不会损害支持残疾文化的最重要承诺。本文介绍并分析了人种学数据,这些数据是通过观察7名临床医生和5名LD患者之间的11次医疗保健预约获得的,这是esrc资助的研究人性化医疗的一部分。它记录了医疗保健领域变革性联盟通过强调尊重、关注和协作行动来改变有害的残疾人做法的潜力,同时也指出,更广泛的结构条件和诊断技术限制了临床医生实施变革性联盟的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.90%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Sociology of Health & Illness is an international journal which publishes sociological articles on all aspects of health, illness, medicine and health care. We welcome empirical and theoretical contributions in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信