Sex and Age-Based Disparities in Bystander Interventions for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Texas.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Ryan Huebinger, Fei Shao, Audrey L Blewer, Kevin Schulz, Christopher Root, Janet Page-Reeves, Bryan McNally, Bentley Bobrow
{"title":"Sex and Age-Based Disparities in Bystander Interventions for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Texas.","authors":"Ryan Huebinger, Fei Shao, Audrey L Blewer, Kevin Schulz, Christopher Root, Janet Page-Reeves, Bryan McNally, Bentley Bobrow","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2498014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Prior studies identify disparities in bystander interventions for female out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients, particularly for those of reproductive age. We sought to evaluate for sex and reproductive age-based disparities in bystander interventions in Texas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively studied the 2013-2023 Texas Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival OHCA registry, excluding OHCAs that occurred in healthcare facilities and nursing homes or were witnessed by 9-1-1 responders. We stratified OHCAs by sex and defined our outcomes at bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) (in public and private locations), and bystander automated external defibrillator placement (BAED). We evaluated the association of sex on bystander interventions using logistic regression. Models were adjusted for race/ethnicity and bystander witnessed arrest. We performed sub-analyses comparing OHCAs that were and were not reproductive age (15-49 years old).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 50,484 OHCAs that met inclusion criteria; 18,602 were female, and 31,882 were male. Including patients of all ages, BCPR rates were similar for females compared to males in public (50.7% vs 51.2%, aOR 0.98 95% CI 0.87-1.07) and private (42.2% vs 42.1%, aOR 1.02 95% CI 0.98-1.06) locations. There were also no differences comparing patients of reproductive and non-reproductive age. Compared to males and including patients of all ages, odds of BAED was lower for females (5.2% vs 6.7%, aOR 0.76 95% CI 0.60-0.96). Odds of BAED was also lower for adult female OHCA patients of non-reproductive age (4.8% vs 7.4%, aOR 0.62 95% CI 0.46-0.82). However, BAED was similar for female OHCA patients of reproductive age.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although we identified lower rates of bystander AED placement for female patients of non-reproductive age, we did not identify consistent sex and age-based disparities in bystander CPR.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2498014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Prior studies identify disparities in bystander interventions for female out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients, particularly for those of reproductive age. We sought to evaluate for sex and reproductive age-based disparities in bystander interventions in Texas.

Methods: We retrospectively studied the 2013-2023 Texas Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival OHCA registry, excluding OHCAs that occurred in healthcare facilities and nursing homes or were witnessed by 9-1-1 responders. We stratified OHCAs by sex and defined our outcomes at bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) (in public and private locations), and bystander automated external defibrillator placement (BAED). We evaluated the association of sex on bystander interventions using logistic regression. Models were adjusted for race/ethnicity and bystander witnessed arrest. We performed sub-analyses comparing OHCAs that were and were not reproductive age (15-49 years old).

Results: We included 50,484 OHCAs that met inclusion criteria; 18,602 were female, and 31,882 were male. Including patients of all ages, BCPR rates were similar for females compared to males in public (50.7% vs 51.2%, aOR 0.98 95% CI 0.87-1.07) and private (42.2% vs 42.1%, aOR 1.02 95% CI 0.98-1.06) locations. There were also no differences comparing patients of reproductive and non-reproductive age. Compared to males and including patients of all ages, odds of BAED was lower for females (5.2% vs 6.7%, aOR 0.76 95% CI 0.60-0.96). Odds of BAED was also lower for adult female OHCA patients of non-reproductive age (4.8% vs 7.4%, aOR 0.62 95% CI 0.46-0.82). However, BAED was similar for female OHCA patients of reproductive age.

Conclusions: Although we identified lower rates of bystander AED placement for female patients of non-reproductive age, we did not identify consistent sex and age-based disparities in bystander CPR.

德克萨斯州院外心脏骤停旁观者干预的性别和年龄差异
目的:先前的研究确定了女性院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者,特别是育龄患者的旁观者干预的差异。我们试图评估德克萨斯州旁观者干预中基于性别和生育年龄的差异。方法:我们回顾性研究了2013-2023年德克萨斯州心脏骤停登记处以提高生存率的OHCA登记处,排除了发生在医疗机构和养老院或911急救人员目睹的OHCA。我们按性别对ohca进行分层,并定义了旁观者心肺复苏(BCPR)(在公共和私人场所)和旁观者自动体外除颤器放置(BAED)的结果。我们使用逻辑回归评估了性别与旁观者干预的关系。模型根据种族/民族和旁观者目击逮捕进行了调整。我们对育龄和非育龄(15-49岁)的ohca进行了亚分析。结果:我们纳入了50,484例符合纳入标准的ohca;女性为18602人,男性为31882人。包括所有年龄段的患者,女性与男性在公共场所(50.7% vs 51.2%, aOR 0.98 95%CI 0.87-1.07)和私人场所(42.2% vs 42.1%, aOR 1.02 95%CI 0.98-1.06)的BCPR发生率相似。育龄和非育龄患者之间也无差异。与男性相比,包括所有年龄段的患者,女性BAED的几率较低(5.2% vs 6.7%, aOR 0.76 95%CI 0.60-0.96)。非育龄成年女性OHCA患者发生BAED的几率也较低(4.8% v 7.4%, aOR 0.62 95%CI 0.46-0.82)。然而,育龄女性OHCA患者的BAED相似。结论:虽然我们确定了非育龄女性患者的旁观者AED放置率较低,但我们没有确定旁观者CPR的性别和年龄差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信