Health-related decision-making experiences of people with endometriosis: a qualitative analysis.

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Psychology & Health Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-16 DOI:10.1080/08870446.2025.2502866
Lynda Fallon, Annie Lau, Donna Ciccia, Tanya Duckworth, Chantelle Pereira, Emily Kopp, Valentina Perica, Kerry A Sherman
{"title":"Health-related decision-making experiences of people with endometriosis: a qualitative analysis.","authors":"Lynda Fallon, Annie Lau, Donna Ciccia, Tanya Duckworth, Chantelle Pereira, Emily Kopp, Valentina Perica, Kerry A Sherman","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2025.2502866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Endometriosis is an incurable inflammatory condition, characterised by chronic pelvic pain, among other symptoms. Optimal symptom management is dependent on an individual's preferences, underscoring the need for person-centred care and shared decision-making. Yet research on decisional support needs of people with endometriosis (PWE) is sparse. This qualitative study aimed to explore decisional processes and decision support needs among PWE regarding endometriosis management. <b>Methods and Measures:</b> Australian adults (<i>N</i> = 41) diagnosed with endometriosis were recruited from support communities to participate in focus groups. Open-ended questions prompted discussion about perceived challenges and facilitators of treatment decision-making. Multiple coders thematically analysed the transcribed qualitative data using the template approach. <b>Results:</b> Four themes were identified: (1) Challenges of accessing pertinent, quality information (sub-themes 1a: Inadequate information from healthcare professionals and 1b: Navigating external information sources); (2) Feeling empowered to self-advocate; (3) Balancing costs and benefits (sub-themes 3a: Financial considerations; and 3b: Balancing family needs); and, (4) Emotional toll of decision-making. Novel findings included emphasis by PWE on family needs when making decisions, and reports that decision-making eroded their resilience. <b>Conclusion:</b> Findings highlight difficulties experienced by PWE regarding endometriosis management, indicating a comprehensive decision support resource, such as a patient decision aid, is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"1155-1180"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2025.2502866","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Endometriosis is an incurable inflammatory condition, characterised by chronic pelvic pain, among other symptoms. Optimal symptom management is dependent on an individual's preferences, underscoring the need for person-centred care and shared decision-making. Yet research on decisional support needs of people with endometriosis (PWE) is sparse. This qualitative study aimed to explore decisional processes and decision support needs among PWE regarding endometriosis management. Methods and Measures: Australian adults (N = 41) diagnosed with endometriosis were recruited from support communities to participate in focus groups. Open-ended questions prompted discussion about perceived challenges and facilitators of treatment decision-making. Multiple coders thematically analysed the transcribed qualitative data using the template approach. Results: Four themes were identified: (1) Challenges of accessing pertinent, quality information (sub-themes 1a: Inadequate information from healthcare professionals and 1b: Navigating external information sources); (2) Feeling empowered to self-advocate; (3) Balancing costs and benefits (sub-themes 3a: Financial considerations; and 3b: Balancing family needs); and, (4) Emotional toll of decision-making. Novel findings included emphasis by PWE on family needs when making decisions, and reports that decision-making eroded their resilience. Conclusion: Findings highlight difficulties experienced by PWE regarding endometriosis management, indicating a comprehensive decision support resource, such as a patient decision aid, is warranted.

子宫内膜异位症患者的健康相关决策经验:定性分析
目的:子宫内膜异位症是一种无法治愈的炎症,其特征是慢性盆腔疼痛,以及其他症状。最佳症状管理取决于个人的偏好,强调需要以人为本的护理和共同决策。然而,关于子宫内膜异位症(PWE)患者决策支持需求的研究很少。本定性研究旨在探讨子宫内膜异位症管理中PWE的决策过程和决策支持需求。方法和措施:从支持社区招募诊断为子宫内膜异位症的澳大利亚成年人(N = 41)参加焦点小组。开放式问题引发了关于治疗决策的感知挑战和促进因素的讨论。多名编码器使用模板方法对转录的定性数据进行主题分析。结果:确定了四个主题:(1)获取相关的高质量信息的挑战(子主题1a:来自医疗保健专业人员的信息不足和1b:导航外部信息来源);(2)感觉有能力自我辩护;平衡成本和收益(分主题3a:财务考虑;和3b:平衡家庭需求);(4)决策的情感代价。新的发现包括PWE在做决定时强调家庭需求,并报告说决策削弱了他们的弹性。结论:研究结果突出了PWE在子宫内膜异位症管理方面遇到的困难,表明需要全面的决策支持资源,如患者决策辅助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Psychology & Health promotes the study and application of psychological approaches to health and illness. The contents include work on psychological aspects of physical illness, treatment processes and recovery; psychosocial factors in the aetiology of physical illnesses; health attitudes and behaviour, including prevention; the individual-health care system interface particularly communication and psychologically-based interventions. The journal publishes original research, and accepts not only papers describing rigorous empirical work, including meta-analyses, but also those outlining new psychological approaches and interventions in health-related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书