Dustin K Miracle, Lindsey R Hammerslag, Svetla Slavova, Feitong Lei, Jeffery Talbert, Daniela C Moga, Patricia R Freeman
{"title":"Changes in Hormonal Contraceptive Dispensing Trends Among Commercially Insured Kentucky Females During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Dustin K Miracle, Lindsey R Hammerslag, Svetla Slavova, Feitong Lei, Jeffery Talbert, Daniela C Moga, Patricia R Freeman","doi":"10.1002/pds.70159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 national emergency declaration on contraceptive dispensing trends among commercially insured Kentucky females.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data ranging from 1/7/2019 through 12/27/2020 for female enrollees aged 19-44 with a primary residence in Kentucky were extracted from the Merative Marketscan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database. A segmented regression analysis was used for statistical modeling of an interrupted time series design to describe changes in weekly contraceptive (oral, transdermal, and vaginal) dispensing rates and days' supply following the COVID-19 national emergency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 90 541 enrollees met study inclusion criteria. The estimated weekly contraceptive dispensing rate per 100 reproductive-aged female enrollees was 3.22 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.16-3.28) at the beginning of the pre-pandemic period. Following the national emergency, an immediate estimated rate increase of 0.11 (95% CI 0.01-0.21; p = 0.030) was seen with no change in trend. At the beginning of the pre-pandemic period, the estimated weekly percentage of days' supply > 28 days was 29.2% (95% CI 28.8-29.6) with an increasing trend of 1.1% every 10 weeks (slope 0.11 [95% CI 0.09-0.12; p < 0.001]). Following the national emergency, an immediate decrease of 1.5% (95% CI -2.2 to -0.8; p < 0.001) was observed, followed by sustainment of the pre-pandemic trend. No differential impacts were seen with regard to age group (19-26 vs. 27-44) or rural-urban classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following the COVID-19 national emergency declaration, trends in both contraceptive dispensing and days' supply among commercially insured Kentucky females were relatively stable, suggesting multiple behavioral and policy-related factors potentially overshadowing changes in access.</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"34 5","pages":"e70159"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70159","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 national emergency declaration on contraceptive dispensing trends among commercially insured Kentucky females.
Methods: Data ranging from 1/7/2019 through 12/27/2020 for female enrollees aged 19-44 with a primary residence in Kentucky were extracted from the Merative Marketscan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database. A segmented regression analysis was used for statistical modeling of an interrupted time series design to describe changes in weekly contraceptive (oral, transdermal, and vaginal) dispensing rates and days' supply following the COVID-19 national emergency.
Results: A total of 90 541 enrollees met study inclusion criteria. The estimated weekly contraceptive dispensing rate per 100 reproductive-aged female enrollees was 3.22 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.16-3.28) at the beginning of the pre-pandemic period. Following the national emergency, an immediate estimated rate increase of 0.11 (95% CI 0.01-0.21; p = 0.030) was seen with no change in trend. At the beginning of the pre-pandemic period, the estimated weekly percentage of days' supply > 28 days was 29.2% (95% CI 28.8-29.6) with an increasing trend of 1.1% every 10 weeks (slope 0.11 [95% CI 0.09-0.12; p < 0.001]). Following the national emergency, an immediate decrease of 1.5% (95% CI -2.2 to -0.8; p < 0.001) was observed, followed by sustainment of the pre-pandemic trend. No differential impacts were seen with regard to age group (19-26 vs. 27-44) or rural-urban classification.
Conclusions: Following the COVID-19 national emergency declaration, trends in both contraceptive dispensing and days' supply among commercially insured Kentucky females were relatively stable, suggesting multiple behavioral and policy-related factors potentially overshadowing changes in access.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report.
Particular areas of interest include:
design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology;
comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world;
methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology;
assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy;
patterns of drug utilization;
relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines;
evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.