Concordance Between the PD-L1 Tumor Area Positivity Score and Combined Positive Score for Gastric or Esophageal Cancers Treated With Tislelizumab.

IF 7.1 1区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Markus Moehler, Harry H Yoon, Daniel-Christoph Wagner, Silu Yang, Jingwen Shi, Yun Zhang, Han Hu, Christopher La Placa, Yanyan Peng, Wenting Du, Adrienne McCampbell, Wenjie Xu, Zhirong Shen, Hui Xu, Ruiqi Huang, Ken Kato
{"title":"Concordance Between the PD-L1 Tumor Area Positivity Score and Combined Positive Score for Gastric or Esophageal Cancers Treated With Tislelizumab.","authors":"Markus Moehler, Harry H Yoon, Daniel-Christoph Wagner, Silu Yang, Jingwen Shi, Yun Zhang, Han Hu, Christopher La Placa, Yanyan Peng, Wenting Du, Adrienne McCampbell, Wenjie Xu, Zhirong Shen, Hui Xu, Ruiqi Huang, Ken Kato","doi":"10.1016/j.modpat.2025.100793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tumor Area Positivity (TAP) score is an emerging score measuring programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in tumors. However, the availability of concordance data between TAP score and other immunohistochemistry scoring methods is limited. We investigated concordance between TAP score and combined positive score (CPS) and the relationship between PD-L1 status and clinical outcomes using gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) samples from patients subsequently treated with tislelizumab. Baseline tissue samples from RATIONALE-305 (GC/GEJC; NCT03777657), RATIONALE-302 (ESCC; NCT03430843), and RATIONALE-306 (ESCC; NCT03783442) were assessed for PD-L1 expression using an investigational-use only version of the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) CDx Assay. PD-L1 status was scored per protocol by TAP score and post-hoc by TAP score and CPS depending on the cutoff used. Concordance and correlation of both scores with clinical and safety outcomes were analyzed. Across all trials, agreement between TAP score and CPS was significant at PD-L1 cutoffs of ≥1%/≥1, ≥5%/≥5, and ≥10%/≥10 (Cohen's Kappa, 0.64-0.85). Similar outcomes for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, objective response rate, and duration of response were observed between TAP score- and CPS-defined PD-L1-positive subgroups at analogous PD-L1 cutoffs. OS hazard ratios (HRs) in the PD-L1-high subgroups were similar between protocol-defined TAP score and the same numeric CPS value (OS HR [95% confidence interval]: RATIONALE-305, 0.72 [0.59-0.88] and 0.73 [0.60-0.89]; RATIONALE-302, 0.52 [0.35-0.76] and 0.54 [0.37-0.78]; RATIONALE-306, 0.63 [0.45-0.89] and 0.58 [0.42-0.81], respectively). Safety outcomes were generally comparable between all PD-L1 subgroups. In conclusion, TAP score and CPS are clinically comparable immunohistochemistry measures of PD-L1 expression in tislelizumab-treated patients with GC/GEJC or ESCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":18706,"journal":{"name":"Modern Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"100793"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modpat.2025.100793","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tumor Area Positivity (TAP) score is an emerging score measuring programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in tumors. However, the availability of concordance data between TAP score and other immunohistochemistry scoring methods is limited. We investigated concordance between TAP score and combined positive score (CPS) and the relationship between PD-L1 status and clinical outcomes using gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) samples from patients subsequently treated with tislelizumab. Baseline tissue samples from RATIONALE-305 (GC/GEJC; NCT03777657), RATIONALE-302 (ESCC; NCT03430843), and RATIONALE-306 (ESCC; NCT03783442) were assessed for PD-L1 expression using an investigational-use only version of the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) CDx Assay. PD-L1 status was scored per protocol by TAP score and post-hoc by TAP score and CPS depending on the cutoff used. Concordance and correlation of both scores with clinical and safety outcomes were analyzed. Across all trials, agreement between TAP score and CPS was significant at PD-L1 cutoffs of ≥1%/≥1, ≥5%/≥5, and ≥10%/≥10 (Cohen's Kappa, 0.64-0.85). Similar outcomes for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, objective response rate, and duration of response were observed between TAP score- and CPS-defined PD-L1-positive subgroups at analogous PD-L1 cutoffs. OS hazard ratios (HRs) in the PD-L1-high subgroups were similar between protocol-defined TAP score and the same numeric CPS value (OS HR [95% confidence interval]: RATIONALE-305, 0.72 [0.59-0.88] and 0.73 [0.60-0.89]; RATIONALE-302, 0.52 [0.35-0.76] and 0.54 [0.37-0.78]; RATIONALE-306, 0.63 [0.45-0.89] and 0.58 [0.42-0.81], respectively). Safety outcomes were generally comparable between all PD-L1 subgroups. In conclusion, TAP score and CPS are clinically comparable immunohistochemistry measures of PD-L1 expression in tislelizumab-treated patients with GC/GEJC or ESCC.

替利单抗治疗胃癌或食管癌的PD-L1肿瘤区域阳性评分与联合阳性评分的一致性
肿瘤区域阳性(Tumor Area positive, TAP)评分是一种衡量肿瘤中程序性死亡配体1 (programmed death-ligand 1, PD-L1)表达的新兴评分方法。然而,TAP评分与其他免疫组织化学评分方法之间的一致性数据的可用性是有限的。我们研究了TAP评分和联合阳性评分(CPS)之间的一致性,以及PD-L1状态与临床结果之间的关系,研究对象是随后接受tislelizumab治疗的患者的胃/胃食管交界处腺癌(GC/GEJC)和食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)样本。RATIONALE-305 (GC/GEJC;Nct03777657), rationale-302 (escc;NCT03430843)和RATIONALE-306 (ESCC;NCT03783442)使用VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) CDx Assay检测PD-L1表达。根据使用的截止时间,每个方案通过TAP评分和事后通过TAP评分和CPS评分PD-L1状态。分析两种评分与临床和安全性结果的一致性和相关性。在所有试验中,在PD-L1截止值≥1%/≥1、≥5%/≥5和≥10%/≥10时,TAP评分和CPS之间的一致性显著(Cohen’s Kappa, 0.64-0.85)。在类似的PD-L1截止点,在TAP评分和cps定义的PD-L1阳性亚组之间观察到类似的总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期、客观缓解率和缓解持续时间。pd - l1高亚组的OS风险比(HRs)在方案定义的TAP评分和相同的数字CPS值之间相似(OS HR[95%置信区间]:rational -305, 0.72[0.59-0.88]和0.73 [0.60-0.89];RATIONALE-302, 0.52[0.35-0.76]和0.54 [0.37-0.78];RATIONALE-306, 0.63[0.45-0.89]和0.58[0.42-0.81])。所有PD-L1亚组之间的安全性结果一般具有可比性。总之,TAP评分和CPS是tislelizumab治疗的GC/GEJC或ESCC患者PD-L1表达的临床可比免疫组织化学指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Modern Pathology
Modern Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
174
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Modern Pathology, an international journal under the ownership of The United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology (USCAP), serves as an authoritative platform for publishing top-tier clinical and translational research studies in pathology. Original manuscripts are the primary focus of Modern Pathology, complemented by impactful editorials, reviews, and practice guidelines covering all facets of precision diagnostics in human pathology. The journal's scope includes advancements in molecular diagnostics and genomic classifications of diseases, breakthroughs in immune-oncology, computational science, applied bioinformatics, and digital pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信