Non-Uniform Sampling for Quantitative NOESY.

IF 1.9 3区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
William T P Darling, Sven G Hyberts, Mate Erdelyi
{"title":"Non-Uniform Sampling for Quantitative NOESY.","authors":"William T P Darling, Sven G Hyberts, Mate Erdelyi","doi":"10.1002/mrc.5529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-uniform sampling (NUS) enables faster acquisition of NMR spectra. Concerns about spectral fidelity, particularly in high-dynamic-range experiments like NOESY, have limited its quantitative applications. In this study, we assessed whether optimised Poisson-gap sampling schemes can generate high-fidelity spectra suitable for quantitation and evaluated the effectiveness of NUS ranking tools, NUSscore and nus-tool, in identifying optimal sampling schemes. A total of 25,000 Poisson-gap sampling schemes were generated and ranked using NUSscore, with a subset of 11 of these spanning the score distribution, alongside 15 random-shuffle and the highest and lowest scoring Poisson-gap schemes determined using the signal apex-to-artefact ratio were used for comparison, all with 50% sampling coverage. Additionally, hybrid sampling schemes incorporating a long initial uniformly sampled section, termed US-NUS hybrid schemes, were evaluated. Spectral fidelity was evaluated on interproton distance accuracy, including the proportion of retained interproton distances and their deviation from uniformly sampled reference spectra. NUSscore showed a strong correlation with spectral fidelity. The peak-to-sidelobe ratio implemented in nus-tool showed no correlation, with the relative sensitivity metric showing a weak correlation. Signal-to-artefact apex ratio was also not predictive for identifying sampling schedules with maintained interproton distances. All Poisson-gap sampling schemes however outperformed random-shuffle. The US-NUS hybrids demonstrated improved interproton distance conservation than traditional Poisson-gap sampling schemes with a low seed dependence, making them a promising sampling schedule for quantitative NOESY analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":18142,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mrc.5529","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-uniform sampling (NUS) enables faster acquisition of NMR spectra. Concerns about spectral fidelity, particularly in high-dynamic-range experiments like NOESY, have limited its quantitative applications. In this study, we assessed whether optimised Poisson-gap sampling schemes can generate high-fidelity spectra suitable for quantitation and evaluated the effectiveness of NUS ranking tools, NUSscore and nus-tool, in identifying optimal sampling schemes. A total of 25,000 Poisson-gap sampling schemes were generated and ranked using NUSscore, with a subset of 11 of these spanning the score distribution, alongside 15 random-shuffle and the highest and lowest scoring Poisson-gap schemes determined using the signal apex-to-artefact ratio were used for comparison, all with 50% sampling coverage. Additionally, hybrid sampling schemes incorporating a long initial uniformly sampled section, termed US-NUS hybrid schemes, were evaluated. Spectral fidelity was evaluated on interproton distance accuracy, including the proportion of retained interproton distances and their deviation from uniformly sampled reference spectra. NUSscore showed a strong correlation with spectral fidelity. The peak-to-sidelobe ratio implemented in nus-tool showed no correlation, with the relative sensitivity metric showing a weak correlation. Signal-to-artefact apex ratio was also not predictive for identifying sampling schedules with maintained interproton distances. All Poisson-gap sampling schemes however outperformed random-shuffle. The US-NUS hybrids demonstrated improved interproton distance conservation than traditional Poisson-gap sampling schemes with a low seed dependence, making them a promising sampling schedule for quantitative NOESY analysis.

定量噪声的非均匀抽样。
非均匀采样(NUS)可以更快地获取NMR光谱。对光谱保真度的担忧,特别是在像NOESY这样的高动态范围实验中,限制了它的定量应用。在这项研究中,我们评估了优化的泊松间隙采样方案是否可以产生适合定量的高保真光谱,并评估了NUS排名工具、NUSscore和NUS -tool在确定最佳采样方案方面的有效性。总共生成了25000个泊松间隙抽样方案,并使用NUSscore对其进行排名,其中11个方案的子集跨越了分数分布,同时使用15个随机洗牌和使用信号顶点与人工比确定的最高和最低评分的泊松间隙方案进行比较,所有方案的抽样覆盖率均为50%。此外,混合抽样方案,包括一个长初始均匀抽样部分,称为US-NUS混合方案,进行了评估。光谱保真度评估了质子间距离精度,包括保留质子间距离的比例及其与均匀采样的参考光谱的偏差。NUSscore与谱保真度有很强的相关性。在us-tool中实现的峰旁瓣比显示没有相关性,相对灵敏度度量显示弱相关性。信号与人工顶点比也不能预测在保持质子间距离的情况下确定采样计划。然而,所有泊松间隙抽样方案都优于随机洗牌。与传统的泊松间隙采样方案相比,US-NUS杂交体表现出更好的质子间距离守恒性,具有较低的种子依赖性,使其成为定量NOESY分析的有希望的采样方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: MRC is devoted to the rapid publication of papers which are concerned with the development of magnetic resonance techniques, or in which the application of such techniques plays a pivotal part. Contributions from scientists working in all areas of NMR, ESR and NQR are invited, and papers describing applications in all branches of chemistry, structural biology and materials chemistry are published. The journal is of particular interest not only to scientists working in academic research, but also those working in commercial organisations who need to keep up-to-date with the latest practical applications of magnetic resonance techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信