Topical Cyclosporine and Steroid Treatments: A Comparative Approach to Membranous Punctal Stenosis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Saidali Kholzoda, Gamze Özkan, Volkan Dericioğlu, Semra Akkaya Turhan
{"title":"Topical Cyclosporine and Steroid Treatments: A Comparative Approach to Membranous Punctal Stenosis.","authors":"Saidali Kholzoda, Gamze Özkan, Volkan Dericioğlu, Semra Akkaya Turhan","doi":"10.1089/jop.2025.0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> To compare the efficacy of topical cyclosporine A (CsA) and steroid treatment in the membranous punctal stenosis (PS). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Forty-eight patients with membranous PS were divided into 2 groups: 23 eyes of 13 patients received topical CsA for 6 months as Group CsA and 25 eyes of 14 patients received topical steroid for 3 months as Group S. Examinations were performed before and at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months after treatment. Clinical evaluations involved the Munk score and the fluorescein dye disappearance test (FDDT). Anterior segment optical coherence tomography was employed to measure tear meniscus height (TMH), tear meniscus area (TMA), and outer punctum diameter (OPD). TMH was also examined with biomicroscopy (TMH-Bio). A questionnaire was administered to assess patient satisfaction. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Munk score and FDDT grade decreased in both groups at all follow-ups compared with the pre-treatment. TMH-Bio was lower in the Group CsA at all follow-up visits compared with baseline (<i>P</i> < 0.001). TMA and TMH decreased in the Group CsA compared with pre-treatment at 6 months after treatment, whereas there were no changes in the Group S. OPD was larger at 9 months in both groups compared with baseline. The patients' satisfaction was higher in Group CsA at the 6th month compared with Group S. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> CsA has demonstrated the potential to be a more effective treatment option for the management of PS, with additional advantages compared with topical steroid, such as higher patient satisfaction and favorable functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2025.0036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of topical cyclosporine A (CsA) and steroid treatment in the membranous punctal stenosis (PS). Methods: Forty-eight patients with membranous PS were divided into 2 groups: 23 eyes of 13 patients received topical CsA for 6 months as Group CsA and 25 eyes of 14 patients received topical steroid for 3 months as Group S. Examinations were performed before and at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months after treatment. Clinical evaluations involved the Munk score and the fluorescein dye disappearance test (FDDT). Anterior segment optical coherence tomography was employed to measure tear meniscus height (TMH), tear meniscus area (TMA), and outer punctum diameter (OPD). TMH was also examined with biomicroscopy (TMH-Bio). A questionnaire was administered to assess patient satisfaction. Results: Munk score and FDDT grade decreased in both groups at all follow-ups compared with the pre-treatment. TMH-Bio was lower in the Group CsA at all follow-up visits compared with baseline (P < 0.001). TMA and TMH decreased in the Group CsA compared with pre-treatment at 6 months after treatment, whereas there were no changes in the Group S. OPD was larger at 9 months in both groups compared with baseline. The patients' satisfaction was higher in Group CsA at the 6th month compared with Group S. Conclusions: CsA has demonstrated the potential to be a more effective treatment option for the management of PS, with additional advantages compared with topical steroid, such as higher patient satisfaction and favorable functional outcomes.

局部环孢素和类固醇治疗:膜性点状狭窄的比较方法。
目的:比较外用环孢素A (CsA)与类固醇治疗膜性点状狭窄(PS)的疗效。方法:将48例膜性PS患者分为两组,分别于治疗前、治疗后1、3、6、9个月分别进行检查。CsA组23眼(13例)局部CsA治疗6个月,s组25眼(14例)局部类固醇治疗3个月。临床评价包括蒙克评分和荧光素染料消失试验(FDDT)。采用前段光学相干断层扫描测量撕裂半月板高度(TMH)、撕裂半月板面积(TMA)和外点直径(OPD)。采用生物显微镜(TMH- bio)检查TMH。通过问卷调查来评估患者的满意度。结果:两组患者的Munk评分和FDDT评分均较治疗前下降。与基线相比,CsA组在所有随访期间的TMH-Bio均较低(P < 0.001)。治疗后6个月,与治疗前相比,CsA组的TMA和TMH下降,而s组没有变化,两组在治疗后9个月的OPD都比基线大。与s组相比,CsA组患者在第6个月的满意度更高。结论:CsA已被证明是治疗PS更有效的治疗选择,与外用类固醇相比,CsA具有更高的患者满意度和良好的功能结局等优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal that combines the fields of ophthalmology and pharmacology to enable optimal treatment and prevention of ocular diseases and disorders. The Journal delivers the latest discoveries in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of therapeutics for the treatment of ophthalmic disorders. Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics coverage includes: Glaucoma Cataracts Retinal degeneration Ocular infection, trauma, and toxicology Ocular drug delivery and biotransformation Ocular pharmacotherapy/clinical trials Ocular inflammatory and immune disorders Gene and cell-based therapies Ocular metabolic disorders Ocular ischemia and blood flow Proliferative disorders of the eye Eyes on Drug Discovery - written by Gary D. Novack, PhD, featuring the latest updates on drug and device pipeline developments as well as policy/regulatory changes by the FDA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信