Real-World Management and Economic Burden of Gallbladder Polyps.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Mohamad Ali Ibrahim, Zakaria El Kouzi, Fayrouz Hachicho, Lynn Kobeissi, Jana Haidar Ahmad, Ala I Sharara
{"title":"Real-World Management and Economic Burden of Gallbladder Polyps.","authors":"Mohamad Ali Ibrahim, Zakaria El Kouzi, Fayrouz Hachicho, Lynn Kobeissi, Jana Haidar Ahmad, Ala I Sharara","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gallbladder polyps (GBP) are found incidentally on imaging in ∼5% of the general population. Most are asymptomatic and only a very small percentage are malignant. This study examines real-world clinical practice management of GBP and adherence to the updated joint European guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with GBP between January 2019 and October 2022 were included. Clinical, radiologic, and surgical data were collected retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred thirty-eight patients were included (mean age 47.0±14.1; female 46.4%). The average follow-up period was 30.6±40.8 months. During the study period, only 26.0% of patients had an increase in GBP size. There were no predictors for GBP growth. Cholecystectomy was performed in 30 patients: 19 (63.3%) had GBP as the indication, and in those, only 9/19 (47.4%) had proper indications according to guidelines. No malignant polyps were found, and no GBP-related deaths were reported. Increased polyp size (P<0.0001) and number (P=0.014) during follow-up were significantly associated with cholecystectomy. Of the 104 patients who did not have surgery, 70 (67.3%) had no indication for follow-up imaging, but 42 (60%) were advised to continue follow-up. The average increased cost of guideline-inconsistent follow-up imaging was >$51,000 and >$67,000 for unindicated cholecystectomies, bringing total waste expenditures to >$118,000.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The natural history of GBP does not justify close or prolonged follow-up, especially in young individuals without risk factors. Poor adherence to guidelines by radiologists, gastroenterologists, surgeons, and other health care providers should be addressed, offering a real opportunity for medical education and significant health care savings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002197","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gallbladder polyps (GBP) are found incidentally on imaging in ∼5% of the general population. Most are asymptomatic and only a very small percentage are malignant. This study examines real-world clinical practice management of GBP and adherence to the updated joint European guidelines.

Methods: Patients with GBP between January 2019 and October 2022 were included. Clinical, radiologic, and surgical data were collected retrospectively.

Results: One hundred thirty-eight patients were included (mean age 47.0±14.1; female 46.4%). The average follow-up period was 30.6±40.8 months. During the study period, only 26.0% of patients had an increase in GBP size. There were no predictors for GBP growth. Cholecystectomy was performed in 30 patients: 19 (63.3%) had GBP as the indication, and in those, only 9/19 (47.4%) had proper indications according to guidelines. No malignant polyps were found, and no GBP-related deaths were reported. Increased polyp size (P<0.0001) and number (P=0.014) during follow-up were significantly associated with cholecystectomy. Of the 104 patients who did not have surgery, 70 (67.3%) had no indication for follow-up imaging, but 42 (60%) were advised to continue follow-up. The average increased cost of guideline-inconsistent follow-up imaging was >$51,000 and >$67,000 for unindicated cholecystectomies, bringing total waste expenditures to >$118,000.

Conclusion: The natural history of GBP does not justify close or prolonged follow-up, especially in young individuals without risk factors. Poor adherence to guidelines by radiologists, gastroenterologists, surgeons, and other health care providers should be addressed, offering a real opportunity for medical education and significant health care savings.

胆囊息肉的现实管理和经济负担。
背景:胆囊息肉(GBP)在大约5%的普通人群中偶然发现。大多数是无症状的,只有很小一部分是恶性的。本研究考察了GBP的实际临床实践管理和对最新欧洲联合指南的遵守。方法:纳入2019年1月至2022年10月期间的GBP患者。回顾性收集临床、放射学和手术资料。结果:纳入138例患者(平均年龄47.0±14.1岁;女性46.4%)。平均随访时间30.6±40.8个月。在研究期间,只有26.0%的患者GBP大小增加。没有对英镑增长的预测。30例患者行胆囊切除术,其中19例(63.3%)以GBP为指征,其中只有9/19例(47.4%)的指征符合指南。未发现恶性息肉,无gbp相关死亡报告。息肉增大(5.1万加元,无指征胆囊切除术6.7万加元),总浪费支出达到11.8万加元。结论:GBP的自然史不能作为密切或长时间随访的理由,特别是在没有危险因素的年轻人中。放射科医生、胃肠科医生、外科医生和其他卫生保健提供者对指导方针的不遵守应该得到解决,这为医学教育和显著的卫生保健节省提供了真正的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信