{"title":"The clinical efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty combined with postural reduction versus kyphoplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Haien Zhao, Kun Ren, Xin Dong, Bo Liao","doi":"10.1177/10538127241296690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are a significant cause of disability worldwide.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this meta-analysis is to explore whether postural reduction and vertebroplasty (PRVP) offers the same therapeutic efficacy as KP to provide evidence for the treatment strategy of OVCFs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched for the published results of relevant trials in PubMed (Jan 2000 to Dec 2023), Ovid (Jan 2000 to Dec 2023), Science Direct online (Jan 2000 to Dec 2023), the Cochrane Library, the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Web of Knowledge (Jan 2000 to Dec 2023), as well as several orthopaedics journals. The full text was obtained and reviewed for the studies meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five randomized studies were adequately included and analyzed. The data was pooled using Review Manager (REVMAN) 5.3 software. The pooled results showed no significant differences between the two groups in indicated outcomes: the Cobb's angle post-operation (MDs, 2.86; 95% CIs, -0.98 to 6.71; P = 0.14), leakage of cement during operation (RR, 1.66; 95% CIs, 0.89 to 3.08; P = 0.11) and the compression rate of related vertebra (MDs, 4.32; 95% CIs, -1.69 to 10.33; P = 0.16).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PRVP and KP were equally effective and safe in the clinical outcomes of OVCFs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127241296690"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127241296690","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are a significant cause of disability worldwide.
Objective: The purpose of this meta-analysis is to explore whether postural reduction and vertebroplasty (PRVP) offers the same therapeutic efficacy as KP to provide evidence for the treatment strategy of OVCFs.
Methods: We searched for the published results of relevant trials in PubMed (Jan 2000 to Dec 2023), Ovid (Jan 2000 to Dec 2023), Science Direct online (Jan 2000 to Dec 2023), the Cochrane Library, the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Web of Knowledge (Jan 2000 to Dec 2023), as well as several orthopaedics journals. The full text was obtained and reviewed for the studies meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Results: Five randomized studies were adequately included and analyzed. The data was pooled using Review Manager (REVMAN) 5.3 software. The pooled results showed no significant differences between the two groups in indicated outcomes: the Cobb's angle post-operation (MDs, 2.86; 95% CIs, -0.98 to 6.71; P = 0.14), leakage of cement during operation (RR, 1.66; 95% CIs, 0.89 to 3.08; P = 0.11) and the compression rate of related vertebra (MDs, 4.32; 95% CIs, -1.69 to 10.33; P = 0.16).
Conclusion: PRVP and KP were equally effective and safe in the clinical outcomes of OVCFs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty.
In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.