Nonlinear Relationship Between Left Atrial Volume Measured by Computed Tomography and Recurrent Atrial Arrhythmias in Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Aikai Zhang, Xiaofeng Li, Yuandong Liu, Min Tang
{"title":"Nonlinear Relationship Between Left Atrial Volume Measured by Computed Tomography and Recurrent Atrial Arrhythmias in Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.","authors":"Aikai Zhang, Xiaofeng Li, Yuandong Liu, Min Tang","doi":"10.1111/jce.16717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left atrial remodeling is commonly believed to contribute to the recurrence of atrial arrhythmias following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the relationship between left atrial volume (LAV) assessed via left atrial computed tomography (LACT) and AF recurrence remains insufficiently explored.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to examine the association between LAV measured by LACT and the recurrence of AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cohort study, 532 consecutive AF patients undergoing their first catheter ablation at Fuwai Hospital were enrolled. The primary outcome was the recurrence of atrial arrhythmias after a 90-day blanking period following the ablation procedure. Semi-automated software (Materialize Mimics) was utilized to analyze LACT data and estimate left atrial size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a median follow-up duration of 16.7 months, 189 patients experienced AF recurrence. Multivariate Cox regression revealed a significant positive association between LAV and recurrence risk (hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.66, p = 0.003). Restrictive cubic spline analysis uncovered a U-shaped nonlinear association between LAV and AF recurrence, with an inflection point identified at 99.3 mL (P for nonlinear < 0.001, P for overall < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated significantly lower freedom from atrial arrhythmias in the 1st and 4th quartile compared to the 2nd quartile (Log-rank, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In AF patients undergoing initial catheter ablation, LAV was found to have a positive relationship with the risk of recurrent atrial arrhythmias, exhibiting a U-shaped nonlinear pattern. Both excessively high and low LAV levels were associated with an elevated risk of AF recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16717","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Left atrial remodeling is commonly believed to contribute to the recurrence of atrial arrhythmias following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the relationship between left atrial volume (LAV) assessed via left atrial computed tomography (LACT) and AF recurrence remains insufficiently explored.

Aim: This study aimed to examine the association between LAV measured by LACT and the recurrence of AF.

Methods: In this cohort study, 532 consecutive AF patients undergoing their first catheter ablation at Fuwai Hospital were enrolled. The primary outcome was the recurrence of atrial arrhythmias after a 90-day blanking period following the ablation procedure. Semi-automated software (Materialize Mimics) was utilized to analyze LACT data and estimate left atrial size.

Results: After a median follow-up duration of 16.7 months, 189 patients experienced AF recurrence. Multivariate Cox regression revealed a significant positive association between LAV and recurrence risk (hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.66, p = 0.003). Restrictive cubic spline analysis uncovered a U-shaped nonlinear association between LAV and AF recurrence, with an inflection point identified at 99.3 mL (P for nonlinear < 0.001, P for overall < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated significantly lower freedom from atrial arrhythmias in the 1st and 4th quartile compared to the 2nd quartile (Log-rank, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: In AF patients undergoing initial catheter ablation, LAV was found to have a positive relationship with the risk of recurrent atrial arrhythmias, exhibiting a U-shaped nonlinear pattern. Both excessively high and low LAV levels were associated with an elevated risk of AF recurrence.

房颤导管消融患者左房容积与复发性心房心律失常的非线性关系
背景:左心房重构通常被认为是心房颤动(AF)导管消融后心房心律失常复发的原因。然而,通过左房计算机断层扫描(LACT)评估的左房容积(LAV)与房颤复发之间的关系仍未得到充分探讨。目的:本研究旨在探讨LACT测量LAV与房颤复发的关系。方法:在本队列研究中,连续532例房颤患者在阜外医院首次行导管消融。主要结果是消融后90天的空白期后房性心律失常的复发。利用半自动化软件Materialize Mimics分析LACT数据并估计左心房大小。结果:中位随访16.7个月后,189例患者发生房颤复发。多因素Cox回归显示LAV与复发风险呈正相关(风险比1.36;95%置信区间,1.11-1.66,p = 0.003)。限制性三次样条分析发现LAV与房颤复发呈非线性u型关系,并在99.3 mL处发现拐点(P为非线性)。结论:房颤患者初次行导管消融时,LAV与房颤复发风险呈正相关,呈非线性u型关系。LAV水平过高或过低均与房颤复发风险升高相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信