Short term effectevness of tibial nerve flossing technique in patients With tarsal tunnel syndrome.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Bassam A El-Nassag, Nadia Mohamed Abdelhakiem, Ahmed S Abdelhamid, Rasha M El-Marakby, Shymaa Salem
{"title":"Short term effectevness of tibial nerve flossing technique in patients With tarsal tunnel syndrome.","authors":"Bassam A El-Nassag, Nadia Mohamed Abdelhakiem, Ahmed S Abdelhamid, Rasha M El-Marakby, Shymaa Salem","doi":"10.1177/10538127251338173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo examine the short-term influence of adding tibial nerve flossing (TNF) technique to conventional therapy on foot pain, Dorsiflexion-Eversion (DF-E) test, ankle range of motion (ROM), and tibial nerve conduction study (NCS) in individuals with Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome (TTS).MethodsThis was a parallel randomized pre-post-test single blinded controlled trial, included 54 individuals with TTS randomized into study and control groups. Both groups received conventional therapy including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), therapeutic ultrasound (US), gastrocnemius (GC) muscle stretching, and foot arches supports/wedges provided as needed with an additional (TNF) technique provided for the study group. The intervention was 3 days/week on alternate days, for a four-week duration. Pain severity and DF-E test as primary; ankle dorsiflexion ROM and tibial NCS as secondary measures, were collected pre- and post-treatment.ResultsWithin-groups comparison showed a significant improvement in all tested variables. Post-treatment between-groups comparison showed a notably higher scores in favor for the study group (p < 0.05) except for the (DF-E) test (p > 0.05).ConclusionTibial nerve flossing is an effective adjunct to conventional therapy in improving foot pain, ankle ROM, and tibial nerve conduction in individuals with TTS.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127251338173"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251338173","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo examine the short-term influence of adding tibial nerve flossing (TNF) technique to conventional therapy on foot pain, Dorsiflexion-Eversion (DF-E) test, ankle range of motion (ROM), and tibial nerve conduction study (NCS) in individuals with Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome (TTS).MethodsThis was a parallel randomized pre-post-test single blinded controlled trial, included 54 individuals with TTS randomized into study and control groups. Both groups received conventional therapy including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), therapeutic ultrasound (US), gastrocnemius (GC) muscle stretching, and foot arches supports/wedges provided as needed with an additional (TNF) technique provided for the study group. The intervention was 3 days/week on alternate days, for a four-week duration. Pain severity and DF-E test as primary; ankle dorsiflexion ROM and tibial NCS as secondary measures, were collected pre- and post-treatment.ResultsWithin-groups comparison showed a significant improvement in all tested variables. Post-treatment between-groups comparison showed a notably higher scores in favor for the study group (p < 0.05) except for the (DF-E) test (p > 0.05).ConclusionTibial nerve flossing is an effective adjunct to conventional therapy in improving foot pain, ankle ROM, and tibial nerve conduction in individuals with TTS.

胫神经牙线技术治疗跗骨隧道综合征的近期疗效观察。
目的探讨在常规治疗基础上加入胫骨神经牙线(TNF)技术对跗骨隧道综合征(TTS)患者足部疼痛、背屈-外翻(DF-E)测试、踝关节活动度(ROM)和胫骨神经传导研究(NCS)的短期影响。方法采用平行、随机、前后单盲对照试验,将54例TTS患者随机分为研究组和对照组。两组均接受常规治疗,包括经皮神经电刺激(TENS)、治疗性超声(US)、腓骨肌(GC)拉伸、根据需要提供足弓支撑/楔,并为研究组提供额外的(TNF)技术。干预为每周3天,隔天进行,持续4周。疼痛严重程度和DF-E测试为主要指标;踝关节背屈曲ROM和胫骨NCS作为次要测量,收集治疗前后的数据。结果组内比较,各项指标均有显著改善。治疗后组间比较显示,研究组的评分明显高于对照组(p < 0.05)。结论胫神经牙线治疗是常规治疗的有效辅助,可改善TTS患者足部疼痛、踝关节ROM和胫神经传导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信