Change in Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter and Cerebral Ventricular Shunt Failure in Children.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Adrienne L Davis, Mark Tessaro, Suzanne Schuh, Armaan K Malhotra, Maya Sumaida, Magali Gauthey, Onaiza Zahid, Sara Breitbart, Helen M Branson, Suzanne Laughlin, Brian W Hanak, Abhaya V Kulkarni
{"title":"Change in Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter and Cerebral Ventricular Shunt Failure in Children.","authors":"Adrienne L Davis, Mark Tessaro, Suzanne Schuh, Armaan K Malhotra, Maya Sumaida, Magali Gauthey, Onaiza Zahid, Sara Breitbart, Helen M Branson, Suzanne Laughlin, Brian W Hanak, Abhaya V Kulkarni","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.11009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Ocular point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) may be a clinically useful method to evaluate shunt dysfunction for children with hydrocephalus presenting to the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether a change in the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) from prior asymptomatic baseline was associated with shunt failure.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Participants in this prospective single-center observational cohort study at a tertiary care children's hospital were enrolled from January 5, 2018, to March 2, 2022. Children 18 years or younger with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunts were consecutively recruited during routine asymptomatic visits in the outpatient neurosurgery clinic. The institution sees approximately 1000 children with shunts. Children with comorbid eye pathologic conditions known to increase the ONSD were excluded, as were those with shunt interventions between baseline and symptomatic ocular POCUS. Data analysis was completed in May 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Baseline ocular POCUS was performed on asymptomatic children with CSF shunts recruited in the outpatient neurosurgery clinic; a second ocular POCUS was performed if the patient subsequently presented to the ED with symptoms of shunt failure. Change in ONSD from prior asymptomatic baseline to symptomatic presentation was the main study exposure.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Shunt failure was defined as intraoperative confirmation of inadequate CSF flow through the shunt system associated with identifiable shunt complications, including catheter or valve obstruction, shunt tubing fracture or disconnection, or proximal catheter migration out of the ventricle within 96 hours from presentation to the ED.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-six pairs of baseline and symptomatic ultrasonograms from 58 patients (mean [SD] age, 6.6 [4.7] years; 36 of 58 boys [62%]) were included. Twenty patients (35%) had 2 or more prior shunt revisions, and 29 (50%) had communicating hydrocephalus. The primary outcome of intraoperatively confirmed shunt failure was observed in 14 of 76 ED patient presentations (18%). The mean (SD) change in ONSD among patients with shunt failure was 0.89 (0.66) mm vs 0.16 (0.40) mm among patients without shunt failure (mean difference, 0.73 mm [95% CI, 0.47-0.99 mm]; P < .001). The odds of full shunt failure were 1.4 times higher (95% CI, 1.21-1.78; P < .001) for every 0.1-mm increase in ONSD. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.86, with an optimal cutoff of 0.4 mm or more, yielding a sensitivity of 0.93, specificity of 0.73, positive predictive value of 0.43, and negative predictive value of 0.98, for a disease prevalence of 15%, with a positive likelihood ratio of 3.39 and negative likelihood ratio of 0.10.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this single-center, prospective cohort study of symptomatic children with CSF shunts, a change in ONSD measured by ocular POCUS was associated with shunt failure. A change in ONSD from prior asymptomatic baseline to symptomatic presentation of less than 0.4 mm identified a population at low risk of true shunt failure. Further research is warranted to validate these findings, the presented change in ONSD threshold, and to risk stratify low-risk patients for cross-sectional neuroimaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 5","pages":"e2511009"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12084842/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.11009","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Ocular point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) may be a clinically useful method to evaluate shunt dysfunction for children with hydrocephalus presenting to the emergency department (ED).

Objective: To evaluate whether a change in the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) from prior asymptomatic baseline was associated with shunt failure.

Design, setting, and participants: Participants in this prospective single-center observational cohort study at a tertiary care children's hospital were enrolled from January 5, 2018, to March 2, 2022. Children 18 years or younger with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunts were consecutively recruited during routine asymptomatic visits in the outpatient neurosurgery clinic. The institution sees approximately 1000 children with shunts. Children with comorbid eye pathologic conditions known to increase the ONSD were excluded, as were those with shunt interventions between baseline and symptomatic ocular POCUS. Data analysis was completed in May 2024.

Exposures: Baseline ocular POCUS was performed on asymptomatic children with CSF shunts recruited in the outpatient neurosurgery clinic; a second ocular POCUS was performed if the patient subsequently presented to the ED with symptoms of shunt failure. Change in ONSD from prior asymptomatic baseline to symptomatic presentation was the main study exposure.

Main outcomes and measures: Shunt failure was defined as intraoperative confirmation of inadequate CSF flow through the shunt system associated with identifiable shunt complications, including catheter or valve obstruction, shunt tubing fracture or disconnection, or proximal catheter migration out of the ventricle within 96 hours from presentation to the ED.

Results: Seventy-six pairs of baseline and symptomatic ultrasonograms from 58 patients (mean [SD] age, 6.6 [4.7] years; 36 of 58 boys [62%]) were included. Twenty patients (35%) had 2 or more prior shunt revisions, and 29 (50%) had communicating hydrocephalus. The primary outcome of intraoperatively confirmed shunt failure was observed in 14 of 76 ED patient presentations (18%). The mean (SD) change in ONSD among patients with shunt failure was 0.89 (0.66) mm vs 0.16 (0.40) mm among patients without shunt failure (mean difference, 0.73 mm [95% CI, 0.47-0.99 mm]; P < .001). The odds of full shunt failure were 1.4 times higher (95% CI, 1.21-1.78; P < .001) for every 0.1-mm increase in ONSD. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.86, with an optimal cutoff of 0.4 mm or more, yielding a sensitivity of 0.93, specificity of 0.73, positive predictive value of 0.43, and negative predictive value of 0.98, for a disease prevalence of 15%, with a positive likelihood ratio of 3.39 and negative likelihood ratio of 0.10.

Conclusions and relevance: In this single-center, prospective cohort study of symptomatic children with CSF shunts, a change in ONSD measured by ocular POCUS was associated with shunt failure. A change in ONSD from prior asymptomatic baseline to symptomatic presentation of less than 0.4 mm identified a population at low risk of true shunt failure. Further research is warranted to validate these findings, the presented change in ONSD threshold, and to risk stratify low-risk patients for cross-sectional neuroimaging.

儿童视神经鞘直径变化与脑室分流衰竭。
重要性:眼点超声(POCUS)可能是一种临床有用的方法来评估儿童脑积水的分流功能障碍提出了急诊科(ED)。目的:评估视神经鞘直径(ONSD)从先前无症状基线的变化是否与分流失败有关。设计、环境和参与者:该前瞻性单中心观察队列研究于2018年1月5日至2022年3月2日在一家三级儿童医院进行。18岁或18岁以下的脑脊液分流患儿在门诊神经外科诊所的常规无症状就诊期间被连续招募。该机构治疗了大约1000名患有分流的儿童。患有已知增加ONSD的共病性眼部病理条件的儿童被排除在外,基线和症状性眼部POCUS之间进行分流干预的儿童也被排除在外。数据分析于2024年5月完成。暴露:在门诊神经外科诊所招募脑脊液分流的无症状儿童进行基线眼部POCUS;如果患者随后出现分流失败的症状,则进行第二次眼部POCUS。从先前无症状基线到有症状表现的ONSD变化是主要的研究暴露。主要结局和措施:分流失败定义为术中确认分流系统中CSF流量不足,并伴有可识别的分流并发症,包括导管或瓣膜阻塞、分流管断裂或断开,或从就诊到ed的96小时内导管近端移出心室。结果:来自58例患者的76对基线和症状超声图(平均[SD]年龄6.6[4.7]岁;58名男孩中有36名(62%)被纳入。20例患者(35%)有2次或以上的分流术翻修,29例(50%)有沟通性脑积水。76例ED患者中有14例(18%)出现术中确认的分流管失效。分流管衰竭患者的ONSD平均(SD)变化为0.89 (0.66)mm,而非分流管衰竭患者的ONSD平均(SD)变化为0.16 (0.40)mm(平均差异为0.73 mm [95% CI, 0.47-0.99 mm];结论和相关性:在这项针对有症状的脑脊液分流患儿的单中心前瞻性队列研究中,通过眼部POCUS测量的ONSD变化与分流失败相关。如果ONSD从之前的无症状基线变化到症状表现小于0.4 mm,则表明该人群的真正分流失败风险较低。需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现,ONSD阈值的变化,并对低风险患者进行风险分层进行横断面神经影像学检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信