Disparities in Tissue-based Biomarker Testing Among U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries with Prostate Cancer.

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Stephan M Korn, Zhiyu Qian, Hanna Zurl, Andrea Piccolini, Klara K Pohl, Stuart Lipsitz, Jianyi Zhang, Adam S Kibel, Caroline M Moore, Huma Q Rana, Kerry L Kilbridge, Shahrokh F Shariat, Stacy Loeb, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Alexander P Cole
{"title":"Disparities in Tissue-based Biomarker Testing Among U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries with Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Stephan M Korn, Zhiyu Qian, Hanna Zurl, Andrea Piccolini, Klara K Pohl, Stuart Lipsitz, Jianyi Zhang, Adam S Kibel, Caroline M Moore, Huma Q Rana, Kerry L Kilbridge, Shahrokh F Shariat, Stacy Loeb, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Alexander P Cole","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Personalized therapeutic approaches for localized prostate cancer have evolved significantly, with tissue-based biomarker tests supplementing traditional risk stratification tools. However, national testing patterns and geographic variability remain limited a decade after coverage implementation. We aimed to assess current nationwide utilization and urban-rural differences in tissue-based biomarker testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using full Medicare claims data, we retrospectively identified patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer and tissue-based biomarker testing claims from 2019 to 2023. Patients' county of residence was categorized as metro, urban, or rural. Regional testing rates were further assessed across hospital referral regions. A multivariable logistic regression model was performed to assess the effect of residence on test receipt.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our final cohort included 749,202 patients, of whom 79.5% lived in metro, 11.4% in urban and 8.00% in rural counties. Overall, 86,908 (11.6%) patients underwent tissue-based biomarker tests. Hospital referral region-level testing rates ranged from 2.4% to 42.7%. Rural patients were 18% less likely to undergo testing compared to metro patients (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.82 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.73-0.91). Independently, the odds of undergoing testing were lower among Black (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.77-0.88) and Hispanic patients (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.88) compared to White patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study reveals high geographic variability in tissue-based biomarker testing for prostate cancer. Further, Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to receive testing. Our findings highlight regional practice variation in the use of advanced, not routinely recommended tests and underscore the need to minimize disparities in diagnostic access.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Personalized therapeutic approaches for localized prostate cancer have evolved significantly, with tissue-based biomarker tests supplementing traditional risk stratification tools. However, national testing patterns and geographic variability remain limited a decade after coverage implementation. We aimed to assess current nationwide utilization and urban-rural differences in tissue-based biomarker testing.

Methods: Using full Medicare claims data, we retrospectively identified patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer and tissue-based biomarker testing claims from 2019 to 2023. Patients' county of residence was categorized as metro, urban, or rural. Regional testing rates were further assessed across hospital referral regions. A multivariable logistic regression model was performed to assess the effect of residence on test receipt.

Results: Our final cohort included 749,202 patients, of whom 79.5% lived in metro, 11.4% in urban and 8.00% in rural counties. Overall, 86,908 (11.6%) patients underwent tissue-based biomarker tests. Hospital referral region-level testing rates ranged from 2.4% to 42.7%. Rural patients were 18% less likely to undergo testing compared to metro patients (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.82 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.73-0.91). Independently, the odds of undergoing testing were lower among Black (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.77-0.88) and Hispanic patients (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.88) compared to White patients.

Conclusion: This study reveals high geographic variability in tissue-based biomarker testing for prostate cancer. Further, Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to receive testing. Our findings highlight regional practice variation in the use of advanced, not routinely recommended tests and underscore the need to minimize disparities in diagnostic access.

美国医疗保险受益人前列腺癌组织生物标志物检测的差异
背景:局部前列腺癌的个性化治疗方法有了显著的发展,基于组织的生物标志物测试补充了传统的风险分层工具。然而,在覆盖实施十年后,国家测试模式和地理差异仍然有限。我们的目的是评估目前全国范围内基于组织的生物标志物检测的使用情况和城乡差异。方法:使用完整的医疗保险索赔数据,我们回顾性地确定了2019年至2023年新诊断的前列腺癌患者和基于组织的生物标志物检测索赔。患者的居住县分为城市、城市和农村。进一步评估了各医院转诊区域的区域检测率。采用多变量logistic回归模型评估居住对测试接收的影响。结果:我们最终的队列包括749,202例患者,其中79.5%生活在城市,11.4%生活在城市,8.00%生活在农村。总体而言,86908例(11.6%)患者接受了基于组织的生物标志物测试。医院转诊地区一级的检测率从2.4%到42.7%不等。农村患者接受检测的可能性比城市患者低18%(优势比[OR] 0.82, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.73-0.91)。独立而言,与白人患者相比,黑人患者(OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.77-0.88)和西班牙裔患者(OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.88)接受检测的几率较低。结论:本研究揭示了前列腺癌基于组织的生物标志物检测具有高度的地理差异性。此外,黑人和西班牙裔患者接受检测的可能性较小。我们的研究结果强调了在使用非常规推荐的先进检测方法方面的地区实践差异,并强调需要尽量减少诊断获取方面的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JNCI Cancer Spectrum Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信