Securing Medication Use in Pediatric Oncology Units in French-Speaking Africa: MAEva Pilot Program Results in Ivory Coast.

IF 3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JCO Global Oncology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-14 DOI:10.1200/GO-24-00360
Line Couitchere, Innocent Krasse, Léa Zaho, Marina Yao, Guy Yao, Carole Coze, Nadine Robert, Olga Molly, Max N'Doumy, Charles Akoun, Bertrand Pourroy
{"title":"Securing Medication Use in Pediatric Oncology Units in French-Speaking Africa: MAEva Pilot Program Results in Ivory Coast.","authors":"Line Couitchere, Innocent Krasse, Léa Zaho, Marina Yao, Guy Yao, Carole Coze, Nadine Robert, Olga Molly, Max N'Doumy, Charles Akoun, Bertrand Pourroy","doi":"10.1200/GO-24-00360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Medication use is a significant global risk for patients, particularly in African hospitals. The aim of this study was to adapt and implement a proactive risk assessment tool for medication use in pediatric oncology units in French-speaking Africa to reduce medication errors and enhance patient safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The médiEval French tool was adapted into the MAEva tool for the African context through a three-stage process: content review by a multidisciplinary group, content formatting, and item modification/validation. Three Excel-based grids (prescription, administration, and dispensing) were used, each audited by external experts to ensure validity and functionality. Initial audits using the MAEva tool were conducted in June 2022. The auditor assessed two pediatric oncologists, a pharmacist, and two nurses. Postaudit results were immediately shared to highlight weaknesses and strengths and to build an action plan. This plan was monitored through regular meetings, and a second audit occurred in September 2023 after implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MAEva grids retained the médiEval tool's structure but adapted 16 of 174 items for the African context. Initial risk levels were high: 29%-34% for prescription, 33% for dispensing, and 44%-45% for administration. A 14-item action plan was created on the basis of audit results, focusing on practical measures without significant financial investment. By September 2023, 54% of the action plan was completed, leading to significant risk reductions: 18 points in prescription, 10 in dispensing, and 26 in administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The adaptation and implementation of the MAEva tool significantly reduced overall risk levels across all processes, demonstrating the effectiveness of the action plan and the tool's applicability in an African context. MAEva's proactive risk assessment approach proved effective and feasible without substantial financial investment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14806,"journal":{"name":"JCO Global Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"e2400360"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Global Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO-24-00360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Medication use is a significant global risk for patients, particularly in African hospitals. The aim of this study was to adapt and implement a proactive risk assessment tool for medication use in pediatric oncology units in French-speaking Africa to reduce medication errors and enhance patient safety.

Methods: The médiEval French tool was adapted into the MAEva tool for the African context through a three-stage process: content review by a multidisciplinary group, content formatting, and item modification/validation. Three Excel-based grids (prescription, administration, and dispensing) were used, each audited by external experts to ensure validity and functionality. Initial audits using the MAEva tool were conducted in June 2022. The auditor assessed two pediatric oncologists, a pharmacist, and two nurses. Postaudit results were immediately shared to highlight weaknesses and strengths and to build an action plan. This plan was monitored through regular meetings, and a second audit occurred in September 2023 after implementation.

Results: The MAEva grids retained the médiEval tool's structure but adapted 16 of 174 items for the African context. Initial risk levels were high: 29%-34% for prescription, 33% for dispensing, and 44%-45% for administration. A 14-item action plan was created on the basis of audit results, focusing on practical measures without significant financial investment. By September 2023, 54% of the action plan was completed, leading to significant risk reductions: 18 points in prescription, 10 in dispensing, and 26 in administration.

Conclusion: The adaptation and implementation of the MAEva tool significantly reduced overall risk levels across all processes, demonstrating the effectiveness of the action plan and the tool's applicability in an African context. MAEva's proactive risk assessment approach proved effective and feasible without substantial financial investment.

法语非洲儿童肿瘤科药物使用安全:MAEva试点项目在科特迪瓦的结果
目的:药物使用是患者面临的一个重大全球风险,特别是在非洲医院。本研究的目的是调整和实施一种前瞻性的风险评估工具,用于法语非洲儿童肿瘤单位的药物使用,以减少药物错误并提高患者安全。方法:通过三个阶段的过程,将msamdieval法语工具改编为MAEva工具,以适应非洲的情况:由多学科小组进行内容审查、内容格式化和项目修改/验证。使用了三个基于excel的网格(处方、给药和配药),每个网格都由外部专家审核,以确保有效性和功能性。2022年6月,使用MAEva工具进行了初步审计。审计员评估了两名儿科肿瘤学家、一名药剂师和两名护士。审计后的结果立即共享,以突出弱点和优势,并制定行动计划。该计划通过定期会议进行监督,并于实施后的2023年9月进行了第二次审计。结果:MAEva网格保留了msamdieval工具的结构,但对174项中的16项进行了调整,以适应非洲的背景。初始风险水平高:处方29%-34%,配药33%,给药44%-45%。根据审计结果制定了一项14项行动计划,重点是在没有大量财政投资的情况下采取实际措施。到2023年9月,该行动计划的54%已经完成,从而显著降低了风险:处方方面降低了18点,配药方面降低了10点,给药方面降低了26点。结论:MAEva工具的调整和实施显著降低了所有流程的总体风险水平,证明了行动计划的有效性和该工具在非洲背景下的适用性。MAEva的前瞻性风险评估方法被证明是有效和可行的,而无需大量的资金投入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JCO Global Oncology
JCO Global Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
310
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信