Health Literacy Among Sexual and Gender-Diverse Adolescents in New York City.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Education & Behavior Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1177/10901981241307616
Abby Marshall, Grace Mackson, Farnaz Kaighobadi, Neal D Hoffman, Adam Ciarleglio, Theo G M Sandfort
{"title":"Health Literacy Among Sexual and Gender-Diverse Adolescents in New York City.","authors":"Abby Marshall, Grace Mackson, Farnaz Kaighobadi, Neal D Hoffman, Adam Ciarleglio, Theo G M Sandfort","doi":"10.1177/10901981241307616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explored sexual orientation and gender identity as predictors of health literacy among adolescents attending New York City (NYC) public high schools. Many studies have demonstrated disparities in sexual health among sexual and gender minority (SGM) adolescents. However, little is known about their health literacy. Health literacy, defined as the capacity to acquire, understand, appraise, and apply health information, especially in health decision-making, is a known predictor of health. Data came from a quantitative cross-sectional survey (<i>N</i> = 1,438) collected at 15 high schools in the Bronx, NYC. Four aspects of health literacy were explored: (1) knowledge of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), (2) knowledge of sexual health rights in New York State, (3) health access literacy and self-efficacy, and (4) health communication. Linear regression analysis was used to test predictors of health literacy. Contrary to our hypothesis, SGM adolescents did not score significantly lower on the health literacy variables compared with cisgender heterosexual adolescents. SGM adolescents scored significantly higher on knowledge of STIs and knowledge of health rights compared with cisgender heterosexual young men. Adolescents who were questioning their sexual identity scored significantly lower compared with both SGM and cisgender heterosexual adolescents on all four health literacy scales. Interventions are needed to ensure that in-school curricula are inclusive and address health literacy among questioning adolescents and cisgender heterosexual young men. Addressing the health needs of questioning adolescents is particularly important because adolescence is a critical time of decision-making around sexuality and health.</p>","PeriodicalId":12974,"journal":{"name":"Health Education & Behavior","volume":"52 3","pages":"289-298"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12084678/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981241307616","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explored sexual orientation and gender identity as predictors of health literacy among adolescents attending New York City (NYC) public high schools. Many studies have demonstrated disparities in sexual health among sexual and gender minority (SGM) adolescents. However, little is known about their health literacy. Health literacy, defined as the capacity to acquire, understand, appraise, and apply health information, especially in health decision-making, is a known predictor of health. Data came from a quantitative cross-sectional survey (N = 1,438) collected at 15 high schools in the Bronx, NYC. Four aspects of health literacy were explored: (1) knowledge of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), (2) knowledge of sexual health rights in New York State, (3) health access literacy and self-efficacy, and (4) health communication. Linear regression analysis was used to test predictors of health literacy. Contrary to our hypothesis, SGM adolescents did not score significantly lower on the health literacy variables compared with cisgender heterosexual adolescents. SGM adolescents scored significantly higher on knowledge of STIs and knowledge of health rights compared with cisgender heterosexual young men. Adolescents who were questioning their sexual identity scored significantly lower compared with both SGM and cisgender heterosexual adolescents on all four health literacy scales. Interventions are needed to ensure that in-school curricula are inclusive and address health literacy among questioning adolescents and cisgender heterosexual young men. Addressing the health needs of questioning adolescents is particularly important because adolescence is a critical time of decision-making around sexuality and health.

纽约市性和性别多样化青少年的健康素养
本研究探讨了性取向和性别认同作为纽约市公立高中青少年健康素养的预测因子。许多研究表明,性和性别少数群体(SGM)青少年在性健康方面存在差异。然而,人们对他们的健康知识知之甚少。卫生素养被定义为获取、理解、评价和应用卫生信息的能力,特别是在卫生决策方面,是众所周知的健康预测指标。数据来自纽约市布朗克斯15所高中的定量横断面调查(N = 1438)。健康素养的四个方面进行了探讨:(1)性传播感染(STIs)的知识,(2)纽约州性健康权利的知识,(3)健康获取素养和自我效能感,以及(4)健康沟通。采用线性回归分析对健康素养的预测因子进行检验。与我们的假设相反,与异性恋青少年相比,SGM青少年在健康素养变量上的得分并没有显著降低。在性传播感染知识和健康权知识方面,性生殖器切割青少年的得分明显高于异性恋青年男性。在所有四种健康素养量表上,质疑自己性身份的青少年得分明显低于SGM和顺性异性恋青少年。需要采取干预措施,以确保学校课程具有包容性,并解决有疑问的青少年和顺性别异性恋青年男子的健康素养问题。解决有问题的青少年的健康需求尤为重要,因为青春期是在性和健康方面做出决策的关键时期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Education & Behavior
Health Education & Behavior PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Health Education & Behavior is the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education (SOPHE). The journal publishes authoritative and practical information on critical health issues for a broad range of professionals interested in understanding factors associated with health behavior and health status, and strategies to improve social and behavioral health. The journal is interested in articles directed toward researchers and/or practitioners in health behavior and health education. Empirical research, case study, program evaluation, literature reviews, and articles discussing theories are regularly published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信