Continued versus Discontinued Oxytocin in the Active Phase of Induced Labor in Term Pregnancies: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Uzair Jafar, Umer Hassan, Fatima Usama, Huzefa Habib, Syed Aftab Haider Kamran, Muhammad Usman Khan, Mehnahil Raza, Muhammad Ubaidullah Arshad, Muhammad Moiz Javed, Andrea Etrusco, Mislav Mikuš, Antonio Simone Laganà
{"title":"Continued versus Discontinued Oxytocin in the Active Phase of Induced Labor in Term Pregnancies: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Uzair Jafar, Umer Hassan, Fatima Usama, Huzefa Habib, Syed Aftab Haider Kamran, Muhammad Usman Khan, Mehnahil Raza, Muhammad Ubaidullah Arshad, Muhammad Moiz Javed, Andrea Etrusco, Mislav Mikuš, Antonio Simone Laganà","doi":"10.1159/000546438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Oxytocin has long been used for the induction of labor, but it can be associated with fetal and maternal complications that could potentially be reduced by discontinuing the treatment during labor. We performed this meta-analysis to determine whether discontinuation of oxytocin, once the active phase of induced labor is achieved, affects the second stage of labor and the rate of various maternal and fetal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing discontinuing oxytocin after the active stage of labor is established versus continuing to give oxytocin throughout the labor process using databases like PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and <ext-link ext-link-type=\"uri\" xlink:href=\"http://ClinicalTrials.gov\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\">ClinicalTrials.gov</ext-link> from the inception till February 1, 2025. Results were pooled using RevMan 5.4, and the effect metric was the risk ratio (RR). Our systematic review and meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024534076).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pooled analysis of fifteen RCTs included in our review showed that discontinuation of oxytocin, once the active stage of labor is established, did not reduce the primary outcome of incidence of cesarean delivery (RR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.77-1.07; p = 0.21). The incidence of uterine tachysystole, postpartum hemorrhage, and non-reassuring fetal heart rate was significantly lower in the oxytocin discontinuation group compared to oxytocin continuation. The rates of uterine rupture, vaginal instrument use, epidural use, and neonatal intensive care unit admission did not differ among both groups. The duration of the active stage of labor was significantly prolonged in the oxytocin-discontinued group; however, the duration of the second stage of labor and total delivery time remained comparable between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Discontinuation of oxytocin during the active phase of labor did not reduce the incidence of cesarean section or neonatal morbidity. We therefore recommend an individualized approach regarding oxytocin discontinuation while factoring in patient-specific factors. New large-scale RCTs focusing on identifying subgroups that might benefit from one approach over the other are required to provide more reliable results.</p>","PeriodicalId":12952,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546438","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Oxytocin has long been used for the induction of labor, but it can be associated with fetal and maternal complications that could potentially be reduced by discontinuing the treatment during labor. We performed this meta-analysis to determine whether discontinuation of oxytocin, once the active phase of induced labor is achieved, affects the second stage of labor and the rate of various maternal and fetal outcomes.

Methods: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing discontinuing oxytocin after the active stage of labor is established versus continuing to give oxytocin throughout the labor process using databases like PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from the inception till February 1, 2025. Results were pooled using RevMan 5.4, and the effect metric was the risk ratio (RR). Our systematic review and meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024534076).

Results: Pooled analysis of fifteen RCTs included in our review showed that discontinuation of oxytocin, once the active stage of labor is established, did not reduce the primary outcome of incidence of cesarean delivery (RR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.77-1.07; p = 0.21). The incidence of uterine tachysystole, postpartum hemorrhage, and non-reassuring fetal heart rate was significantly lower in the oxytocin discontinuation group compared to oxytocin continuation. The rates of uterine rupture, vaginal instrument use, epidural use, and neonatal intensive care unit admission did not differ among both groups. The duration of the active stage of labor was significantly prolonged in the oxytocin-discontinued group; however, the duration of the second stage of labor and total delivery time remained comparable between the two groups.

Conclusions: Discontinuation of oxytocin during the active phase of labor did not reduce the incidence of cesarean section or neonatal morbidity. We therefore recommend an individualized approach regarding oxytocin discontinuation while factoring in patient-specific factors. New large-scale RCTs focusing on identifying subgroups that might benefit from one approach over the other are required to provide more reliable results.

在足月妊娠引产活跃期继续使用催产素与停止使用催产素:一项随机对照试验的最新系统综述和荟萃分析。
长期以来,催产素一直用于引产,但可能与胎儿和母体并发症有关,这些并发症可能通过在分娩期间停止治疗而减少。我们进行了这项荟萃分析,以确定一旦引产进入活跃期,停止催产素刺激是否会影响第二产程以及各种母婴结局的发生率。方法:我们检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和ClinicalTrials.gov网站,检索自成立之日至2025年2月1日的随机对照试验(rct),比较一旦确定产活期停止使用催产素与整个产过程中持续使用催产素的比较。采用RevMan 5.4对结果进行汇总,以风险比(RR)作为效果度量。我们的meta分析已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024534076)。结果纳入本综述的15项随机对照试验的汇总分析显示,一旦确定产程活跃期,停用催产素并没有降低剖宫产发生率的主要结局(RR= 0.91;95% ci, 0.77-1.07;P = 0.21)。停用催产素组子宫心动过速、产后出血、胎心不稳发生率明显降低。子宫破裂率、阴道器械使用率、硬膜外使用率和新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入院率在两组之间没有差异。停用催产素组的活产期持续时间明显延长,但两组的第二产程持续时间和总分娩时间保持可比性。结论:综上所述,在产程活跃期停用催产素并不能降低剖宫产的发生率或新生儿的发病率。因此,我们建议在考虑患者特定因素的同时,采用个体化的方法停用催产素。需要新的大规模随机对照试验,以确定可能从一种方法中受益的亚组,从而提供更可靠的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal covers the most active and promising areas of current research in gynecology and obstetrics. Invited, well-referenced reviews by noted experts keep readers in touch with the general framework and direction of international study. Original papers report selected experimental and clinical investigations in all fields related to gynecology, obstetrics and reproduction. Short communications are published to allow immediate discussion of new data. The international and interdisciplinary character of this periodical provides an avenue to less accessible sources and to worldwide research for investigators and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信