Stipe Corluka, Sathish Muthu, Tim Yoon, Carla Cunha, Matthew Gary, Gianluca Vadala, Giovanni Barbanto Brodano, Annalisa Monetta, Andreas Demetriades, Stjepan Ivandić, Yabin Wu, Jeffrey Wang, Hans-Jorg Meisel, Zorica Buser
{"title":"Decompression-Only for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis - What are the Risk for Failure? - A Systematic Review.","authors":"Stipe Corluka, Sathish Muthu, Tim Yoon, Carla Cunha, Matthew Gary, Gianluca Vadala, Giovanni Barbanto Brodano, Annalisa Monetta, Andreas Demetriades, Stjepan Ivandić, Yabin Wu, Jeffrey Wang, Hans-Jorg Meisel, Zorica Buser","doi":"10.1177/21925682251342230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignSystematic review.ObjectiveThe current literature suggests that decompression-only procedures may be an adequate treatment option for low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis. It is necessary to understand the causes of the failure to adequately select patients to achieve acceptable results. Our aim is to identify factors associated with failure of decompression-only procedures for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.MethodsAn independent systematic review of scientific databases (PubMed, Scopus, clinicaltrials. gov, Web of Science) was performed to identify relevant articles as per the preferred reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies analysing the risk factors for failure following decompression-only procedure for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were included. The pooled analysis was performed using the Stata software.ResultsSix studies were included with the baseline characteristics of the successful group and the failed group. Individual study analysis has found factors like motion at index level, and multi-level decompression to be responsible for failure. However, upon pooled analysis patient-related factors (age, sex, BMI), disease-related factors (Pfirrmann grade, slip distance, disc height, facet angulation, translation, movement at index level, sacral slope), and outcome parameters (VAS, ODI and JOA score) between the two groups did not demonstrate any significant difference.ConclusionHigh-quality evidence analysing the risk factors for failure of decompression-only procedure for degenerative spondylolisthesis is limited. Although factors such as motion at index level, and multi-level decompression were found to be potential risk factors in individual studies, pooled analysis did not find any of them to significantly predict failure of decompression-only procedures for degenerative spondylolisthesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251342230"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081395/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251342230","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study DesignSystematic review.ObjectiveThe current literature suggests that decompression-only procedures may be an adequate treatment option for low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis. It is necessary to understand the causes of the failure to adequately select patients to achieve acceptable results. Our aim is to identify factors associated with failure of decompression-only procedures for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.MethodsAn independent systematic review of scientific databases (PubMed, Scopus, clinicaltrials. gov, Web of Science) was performed to identify relevant articles as per the preferred reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies analysing the risk factors for failure following decompression-only procedure for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were included. The pooled analysis was performed using the Stata software.ResultsSix studies were included with the baseline characteristics of the successful group and the failed group. Individual study analysis has found factors like motion at index level, and multi-level decompression to be responsible for failure. However, upon pooled analysis patient-related factors (age, sex, BMI), disease-related factors (Pfirrmann grade, slip distance, disc height, facet angulation, translation, movement at index level, sacral slope), and outcome parameters (VAS, ODI and JOA score) between the two groups did not demonstrate any significant difference.ConclusionHigh-quality evidence analysing the risk factors for failure of decompression-only procedure for degenerative spondylolisthesis is limited. Although factors such as motion at index level, and multi-level decompression were found to be potential risk factors in individual studies, pooled analysis did not find any of them to significantly predict failure of decompression-only procedures for degenerative spondylolisthesis.
研究设计:系统评价。目的目前的文献表明,单纯减压手术可能是治疗轻度退行性椎体滑脱的适当选择。有必要了解未能充分选择患者以获得可接受结果的原因。我们的目的是确定与退行性腰椎滑脱减压手术失败相关的因素。方法对科学数据库(PubMed, Scopus,临床试验)进行独立系统评价。gov, Web of Science),根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南中的首选报告来识别相关文章。研究分析了退行性腰椎滑脱单纯减压手术失败的危险因素。采用Stata软件进行汇总分析。结果6项研究纳入成功组和失败组的基线特征。个体研究分析发现,指数水平运动和多级减压等因素是导致失败的原因。然而,经合并分析,两组患者相关因素(年龄、性别、BMI)、疾病相关因素(Pfirrmann分级、滑移距离、椎间盘高度、关节面成角、平移、指数水平运动、骶骨坡度)和结局参数(VAS、ODI和JOA评分)均无显著差异。结论分析退行性椎体滑脱单纯减压手术失败的危险因素的高质量证据是有限的。虽然在个别研究中发现指数水平运动和多级减压等因素是潜在的危险因素,但汇总分析并未发现它们中的任何一个可以显著预测退行性椎体滑脱仅减压手术的失败。
期刊介绍:
Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).