Contemporary Practice in Adrenal Surgery: A Review of Multiport versus Single-port and Transperitoneal versus Retroperitoneal Approaches.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Mohammed Hegazy, Saif Toubasey, Francesco Del Giudice, Ben Challacombe
{"title":"Contemporary Practice in Adrenal Surgery: A Review of Multiport versus Single-port and Transperitoneal versus Retroperitoneal Approaches.","authors":"Mohammed Hegazy, Saif Toubasey, Francesco Del Giudice, Ben Challacombe","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robotic adrenalectomy has emerged as the preferred approach for adrenal gland surgery because of its greater precision, better ergonomics, good safety profile, and minimally invasive nature. There is ongoing debate over the optimal surgical approach, specifically regarding multiport versus single-port platforms, and transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal access. Multiport robotic adrenalectomy remains the standard because of its familiarity and wider surgical exposure, whereas single-port surgery offers the advantage of better cosmesis and lower incision-related morbidity despite a more challenging learning curve. The transperitoneal approach provides familiar and superior anatomic visibility and working space, while the retroperitoneal approach avoids intra-abdominal dissection, reduces postoperative ileus, and may be preferable in selected patients. This review summarises the advantages and limitations of each technique to inform surgical decision-making. PATIENT SUMMARY: This review compares ways of performing keyhole surgery on the adrenal gland. Keyhole surgery using multiple small incisions has been more common because of the ease of use and familiarity, while keyhole surgery using a single incision has better cosmetic results but is more difficult. Accessing the adrenal gland through the abdomen (transperitoneal access) provides better visibility, whereas access by avoiding the abdomen (retroperitoneal access) allows faster patient recovery after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.05.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Robotic adrenalectomy has emerged as the preferred approach for adrenal gland surgery because of its greater precision, better ergonomics, good safety profile, and minimally invasive nature. There is ongoing debate over the optimal surgical approach, specifically regarding multiport versus single-port platforms, and transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal access. Multiport robotic adrenalectomy remains the standard because of its familiarity and wider surgical exposure, whereas single-port surgery offers the advantage of better cosmesis and lower incision-related morbidity despite a more challenging learning curve. The transperitoneal approach provides familiar and superior anatomic visibility and working space, while the retroperitoneal approach avoids intra-abdominal dissection, reduces postoperative ileus, and may be preferable in selected patients. This review summarises the advantages and limitations of each technique to inform surgical decision-making. PATIENT SUMMARY: This review compares ways of performing keyhole surgery on the adrenal gland. Keyhole surgery using multiple small incisions has been more common because of the ease of use and familiarity, while keyhole surgery using a single incision has better cosmetic results but is more difficult. Accessing the adrenal gland through the abdomen (transperitoneal access) provides better visibility, whereas access by avoiding the abdomen (retroperitoneal access) allows faster patient recovery after surgery.

当代肾上腺外科实践:多孔与单孔、经腹膜与后腹膜入路的回顾。
机器人肾上腺切除术已成为肾上腺手术的首选方法,因为它具有更高的精度、更好的人体工程学、良好的安全性和微创性。关于最佳手术入路的争论正在进行,特别是关于多口与单口平台,以及经腹膜与后腹膜入路。多孔机器人肾上腺切除术仍然是标准的,因为它熟悉和更广泛的手术暴露,而单孔手术提供了更好的美容和更低的切口相关发病率的优势,尽管学习曲线更具挑战性。经腹膜入路提供熟悉和优越的解剖可见性和工作空间,而腹膜后入路避免腹腔内剥离,减少术后肠梗阻,在特定患者中可能更可取。本文综述了每种技术的优点和局限性,为手术决策提供参考。患者总结:这篇综述比较了在肾上腺上进行锁眼手术的方法。由于易于使用和熟悉,使用多个小切口的锁孔手术更为常见,而使用单个切口的锁孔手术具有更好的美容效果,但难度更大。通过腹部进入肾上腺(经腹膜通道)提供更好的可视性,而通过避免腹部进入(腹膜后通道)可以使患者在手术后更快恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European urology focus
European urology focus Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU). EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信