Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) plus Lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors versus systemic chemotherapy for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Qingyu Xu, Chendong Wang, Ran You, Bin Leng, Zeyu Yu, Ya Lu, Lingfeng Diao, Hao Jiang, Bei Wu, Guowen Yin
{"title":"Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) plus Lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors versus systemic chemotherapy for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.","authors":"Qingyu Xu, Chendong Wang, Ran You, Bin Leng, Zeyu Yu, Ya Lu, Lingfeng Diao, Hao Jiang, Bei Wu, Guowen Yin","doi":"10.1007/s12672-025-02397-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is characterized with dismal prognosis. Here, this study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors versus systemic chemotherapy (SC) for unresectable iCCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with histologically confirmed unresectable iCCA from January 2020 to December 2022 at our center were retrospectively enrolled. Propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to balance clinicopathological information between two groups. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), whereas the secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease-control rate (DCR) and safety profiles. Factors affecting the survival were identified through univariate and multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-six cases were included in this study. After PSM, there were 30 patients in each group. Compared to SC group, HAIC + Len + PD-1 inhibitor exhibited significantly improved OS (16.91 [95%CI: 11.6-28.4] months vs. 11.06 months [95%CI: 7.8-14.6 months], p = 0.011), PFS (11.17 months [95%CI: 7.0, 26.7] vs. 5.55 months [95%CI: 3.8, NA], p = 0.004), better ORR (56.7% vs. 23.3%, p = 0.008) and DCR (93.3% vs. 70.0%, p = 0.019). Multivariate analysis indicated that treatment arm of SC was a risk factor of worse OS and PFS, while uni-lobe tumor distribution, AST ≤ 40, CA19-9 level ≤ 39 were protective factors of worse OS. All adverse events were comparable and controllable between two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, HAIC combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 blockade yields better tumor control and survival outcomes over SC for unresectable iCCA, with manageable adverse events as well.</p>","PeriodicalId":11148,"journal":{"name":"Discover. Oncology","volume":"16 1","pages":"775"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081786/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discover. Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-025-02397-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is characterized with dismal prognosis. Here, this study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors versus systemic chemotherapy (SC) for unresectable iCCA.

Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed unresectable iCCA from January 2020 to December 2022 at our center were retrospectively enrolled. Propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to balance clinicopathological information between two groups. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), whereas the secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease-control rate (DCR) and safety profiles. Factors affecting the survival were identified through univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results: Eighty-six cases were included in this study. After PSM, there were 30 patients in each group. Compared to SC group, HAIC + Len + PD-1 inhibitor exhibited significantly improved OS (16.91 [95%CI: 11.6-28.4] months vs. 11.06 months [95%CI: 7.8-14.6 months], p = 0.011), PFS (11.17 months [95%CI: 7.0, 26.7] vs. 5.55 months [95%CI: 3.8, NA], p = 0.004), better ORR (56.7% vs. 23.3%, p = 0.008) and DCR (93.3% vs. 70.0%, p = 0.019). Multivariate analysis indicated that treatment arm of SC was a risk factor of worse OS and PFS, while uni-lobe tumor distribution, AST ≤ 40, CA19-9 level ≤ 39 were protective factors of worse OS. All adverse events were comparable and controllable between two groups.

Conclusions: In conclusion, HAIC combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 blockade yields better tumor control and survival outcomes over SC for unresectable iCCA, with manageable adverse events as well.

肝动脉输注化疗(HAIC)加Lenvatinib和PD-1抑制剂与全身化疗治疗不可切除的肝内胆管癌的比较
背景:不可切除的肝内胆管癌(iCCA)具有预后差的特点。本研究旨在比较肝动脉输注化疗(HAIC)联合lenvatinib和PD-1抑制剂与全身化疗(SC)治疗不可切除iCCA的疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性纳入本中心2020年1月至2022年12月组织学证实不可切除的iCCA患者。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)方法平衡两组患者的临床病理信息。主要终点是总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS),而次要终点包括客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)和安全性。通过单因素和多因素分析确定影响生存的因素。结果:86例病例纳入本研究。经PSM治疗后,每组30例。与SC组相比,HAIC + Len + PD-1抑制剂显著改善了OS (16.91 [95%CI: 11.6-28.4]个月比11.06个月[95%CI: 7.8-14.6个月],p = 0.011)、PFS(11.17个月[95%CI: 7.0, 26.7]比5.55个月[95%CI: 3.8, NA], p = 0.004)、ORR(56.7%比23.3%,p = 0.008)和DCR(93.3%比70.0%,p = 0.019)。多因素分析表明,SC治疗组是OS和PFS恶化的危险因素,而单叶肿瘤分布、AST≤40、CA19-9水平≤39是OS恶化的保护因素。两组间所有不良事件具有可比性和可控性。结论:总之,对于不可切除的iCCA, HAIC联合lenvatinib和PD-1阻断比SC有更好的肿瘤控制和生存结果,不良事件也可控。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Discover. Oncology
Discover. Oncology Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
122
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信