Safety Profile of Amantadine: A Comprehensive Analysis of Real-World Adverse Events from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database.

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Wenpei Chen, Xianjun Chen
{"title":"Safety Profile of Amantadine: A Comprehensive Analysis of Real-World Adverse Events from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database.","authors":"Wenpei Chen, Xianjun Chen","doi":"10.2174/0115748863338311241225174353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a significant public health issue, often leading to long-term cognitive, physical, and emotional impairments. Amantadine has emerged as a treatment option due to its potential neuroprotective properties, aiming to enhance recovery. However, its safety profile in TBI patients remains under scrutiny.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the safety of amantadine using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, focusing on identifying novel adverse events to inform clinical decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed adverse event reports of amantadine from FAERS (2004-2024), identifying 2766 reports where it was the primary suspect. Signal detection was conducted using ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and MGPS methods, ranked by ROR values. A gender subgroup analysis with Bonferroni correction ensured statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 2766 reports, most events were related to nervous (n=2013, ROR=2.9) and psychiatric disorders (n=1631, ROR=3.46). Notable events included hallucinations (n=302, ROR=27.57), falls (n=286, ROR=5.7), and drug inefficacy (n=266, ROR=1.34). Adverse events were more common in patients aged 65+ years (48.5%) and slightly more frequent in females (49.3%). New adverse events identified included falls, drug inefficacy, tremors, and gait disturbances, mostly occurring within the first month of treatment (39.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study revealed significant safety concerns with amantadine, especially regarding nervous and psychiatric reactions. It highlighted the need for careful monitoring in clinical use and further research to understand mechanisms, enhance therapeutic outcomes, and minimize adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":10777,"journal":{"name":"Current drug safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current drug safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115748863338311241225174353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a significant public health issue, often leading to long-term cognitive, physical, and emotional impairments. Amantadine has emerged as a treatment option due to its potential neuroprotective properties, aiming to enhance recovery. However, its safety profile in TBI patients remains under scrutiny.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the safety of amantadine using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, focusing on identifying novel adverse events to inform clinical decisions.

Methods: We analyzed adverse event reports of amantadine from FAERS (2004-2024), identifying 2766 reports where it was the primary suspect. Signal detection was conducted using ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and MGPS methods, ranked by ROR values. A gender subgroup analysis with Bonferroni correction ensured statistical significance.

Results: Among the 2766 reports, most events were related to nervous (n=2013, ROR=2.9) and psychiatric disorders (n=1631, ROR=3.46). Notable events included hallucinations (n=302, ROR=27.57), falls (n=286, ROR=5.7), and drug inefficacy (n=266, ROR=1.34). Adverse events were more common in patients aged 65+ years (48.5%) and slightly more frequent in females (49.3%). New adverse events identified included falls, drug inefficacy, tremors, and gait disturbances, mostly occurring within the first month of treatment (39.6%).

Conclusion: The study revealed significant safety concerns with amantadine, especially regarding nervous and psychiatric reactions. It highlighted the need for careful monitoring in clinical use and further research to understand mechanisms, enhance therapeutic outcomes, and minimize adverse events.

金刚烷胺的安全性:对FDA不良事件报告系统数据库中真实世界不良事件的综合分析。
背景:外伤性脑损伤(TBI)是一个重要的公共卫生问题,常导致长期的认知、身体和情绪损伤。金刚烷胺已成为一种治疗选择,由于其潜在的神经保护特性,旨在提高恢复。然而,其在脑外伤患者中的安全性仍有待进一步研究。目的:本研究旨在利用FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库评估金刚烷胺的安全性,重点是识别新的不良事件,为临床决策提供信息。方法:我们分析了FAERS(2004-2024)中金刚烷胺的不良事件报告,确定了2766份报告,其中金刚烷胺是主要的怀疑对象。采用ROR、PRR、BCPNN和MGPS方法进行信号检测,按ROR值排序。采用Bonferroni校正的性别亚组分析确保了统计学意义。结果:2766例报告中,大多数事件与神经(n=2013, ROR=2.9)和精神障碍(n=1631, ROR=3.46)有关。值得注意的事件包括幻觉(n=302, ROR=27.57)、跌倒(n=286, ROR=5.7)和药物无效(n=266, ROR=1.34)。不良事件在65岁以上的患者中更为常见(48.5%),女性稍多(49.3%)。新发现的不良事件包括跌倒、药物无效、震颤和步态障碍,主要发生在治疗的第一个月内(39.6%)。结论:该研究揭示了金刚烷胺的安全性问题,特别是在神经和精神反应方面。它强调了在临床使用中需要仔细监测和进一步研究,以了解机制,提高治疗效果,并尽量减少不良事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current drug safety
Current drug safety PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Current Drug Safety publishes frontier articles on all the latest advances on drug safety. The journal aims to publish the highest quality research articles, reviews and case reports in the field. Topics covered include: adverse effects of individual drugs and drug classes, management of adverse effects, pharmacovigilance and pharmacoepidemiology of new and existing drugs, post-marketing surveillance. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians involved in drug safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信