Inequalities in CAR T-Cell Therapy Access for US Patients with Relapsed/Refractory DLBCL: A SEER-Medicare Data Analysis.

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Andrea Chung, Jason Shafrin, Sachin Vadgama, Kristen Hurley, Miguel-Angel Perales, Leonard Clarkson Alsfeld, Sanjana Muthukrishnan, Anik R Patel, Gunjan L Shah, Richard T Maziarz
{"title":"Inequalities in CAR T-Cell Therapy Access for US Patients with Relapsed/Refractory DLBCL: A SEER-Medicare Data Analysis.","authors":"Andrea Chung, Jason Shafrin, Sachin Vadgama, Kristen Hurley, Miguel-Angel Perales, Leonard Clarkson Alsfeld, Sanjana Muthukrishnan, Anik R Patel, Gunjan L Shah, Richard T Maziarz","doi":"10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>CAR T-cell therapy has shown curative potential for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and other malignancies, but its accessibility among Medicare patients, particularly in disadvantaged populations, remains uncertain. This study aims to assess CAR T utilization in Medicare patients with DLBCL receiving third-line or later (3L+) treatment, focusing on access disparities and their impact on clinical outcomes. Using SEER-Medicare data from 2007-2020, multivariate logistic regression was employed to evaluate patient characteristics and the effects of distance to authorized treatment centers (ATCs) on CAR T access. Between 2017 and 2020, 2,241 patients were treated for 3L+ DLBCL in the SEER-Medicare data, of which 122 (5.4%) received CAR T. CAR T recipients were less likely to have multiple comorbidities (OR=0.904, p = 0.001), but more likely to live in higher income areas (OR=1.176, p = 0.004). If distance to the nearest ATC for 'poor access' states (average distance to ATC=104.4 miles) decreased to the average distance in 'better access' states (34.2 miles), there would be a 37.6% increase in number of patients receiving CAR T (6.6% to 9.1%, p<0.001). These findings highlight substantial disparities in CAR T utilization, driven by geographic and socioeconomic factors. Addressing these barriers could significantly enhance equitable access to CAR T therapy and improve outcomes for underserved populations, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to reduce geographic and systemic barriers to care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9228,"journal":{"name":"Blood advances","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood advances","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015634","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CAR T-cell therapy has shown curative potential for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and other malignancies, but its accessibility among Medicare patients, particularly in disadvantaged populations, remains uncertain. This study aims to assess CAR T utilization in Medicare patients with DLBCL receiving third-line or later (3L+) treatment, focusing on access disparities and their impact on clinical outcomes. Using SEER-Medicare data from 2007-2020, multivariate logistic regression was employed to evaluate patient characteristics and the effects of distance to authorized treatment centers (ATCs) on CAR T access. Between 2017 and 2020, 2,241 patients were treated for 3L+ DLBCL in the SEER-Medicare data, of which 122 (5.4%) received CAR T. CAR T recipients were less likely to have multiple comorbidities (OR=0.904, p = 0.001), but more likely to live in higher income areas (OR=1.176, p = 0.004). If distance to the nearest ATC for 'poor access' states (average distance to ATC=104.4 miles) decreased to the average distance in 'better access' states (34.2 miles), there would be a 37.6% increase in number of patients receiving CAR T (6.6% to 9.1%, p<0.001). These findings highlight substantial disparities in CAR T utilization, driven by geographic and socioeconomic factors. Addressing these barriers could significantly enhance equitable access to CAR T therapy and improve outcomes for underserved populations, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to reduce geographic and systemic barriers to care.

美国复发/难治性DLBCL患者CAR - t细胞治疗的不平等:一项SEER-Medicare数据分析
CAR - t细胞疗法已经显示出对弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)和其他恶性肿瘤患者的治疗潜力,但其在医疗保险患者,特别是弱势群体中的可及性仍不确定。本研究旨在评估接受三线或更晚(3L+)治疗的医保DLBCL患者的CAR - T使用情况,重点关注可及性差异及其对临床结果的影响。使用2007-2020年的SEER-Medicare数据,采用多变量logistic回归来评估患者特征以及到授权治疗中心(ATCs)的距离对CAR - T准入的影响。在2017年至2020年期间,SEER-Medicare数据中有2241例患者接受了3L+ DLBCL治疗,其中122例(5.4%)接受了CAR T治疗,CAR T接受者出现多种合病的可能性较小(OR=0.904, p = 0.001),但更有可能生活在高收入地区(OR=1.176, p = 0.004)。如果“交通不便”州到最近的ATC的距离(到ATC的平均距离=104.4英里)减少到“交通便利”州的平均距离(34.2英里),那么接受CAR - T治疗的患者数量将增加37.6%(6.6%至9.1%,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood advances
Blood advances Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
840
期刊介绍: Blood Advances, a semimonthly medical journal published by the American Society of Hematology, marks the first addition to the Blood family in 70 years. This peer-reviewed, online-only, open-access journal was launched under the leadership of founding editor-in-chief Robert Negrin, MD, from Stanford University Medical Center in Stanford, CA, with its inaugural issue released on November 29, 2016. Blood Advances serves as an international platform for original articles detailing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. The journal comprehensively covers all aspects of hematology, including disorders of leukocytes (both benign and malignant), erythrocytes, platelets, hemostatic mechanisms, vascular biology, immunology, and hematologic oncology. Each article undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, with selection based on the originality of the findings, the high quality of the work presented, and the clarity of the presentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信