Predictors of Discharge Home Versus Inpatient Rehabilitation Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty-Cohort Study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Kaka Martina, Michelle M Dowsey, David J Hunter, Justin P Roe, Matthew C Lyons, Michael D O'Sullivan, Benjamin Gooden, Phil Huang, David Carmody, Keran Sundaraj, Leo A Pinczewski, Lucy J Salmon
{"title":"Predictors of Discharge Home Versus Inpatient Rehabilitation Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty-Cohort Study.","authors":"Kaka Martina, Michelle M Dowsey, David J Hunter, Justin P Roe, Matthew C Lyons, Michael D O'Sullivan, Benjamin Gooden, Phil Huang, David Carmody, Keran Sundaraj, Leo A Pinczewski, Lucy J Salmon","doi":"10.1111/ans.70170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to identify the prevalence of inpatient rehabilitation (IPR) use in an Australian private total joint arthroplasty (TJA) cohort and to identify factors predictive of IPR discharge, including components of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Primary TJA patients at a Sydney private hospital, between 2021 and 2022 were identified from an institutional arthroplasty database. Variables previously deemed as predictive factors for IPR facility discharge in the literature and components of RAPT were assessed utilising multivariable generalised linear model analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 733 total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 776 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients included, 46% of THA and 64% of TKA subjects transferred to IPR post-acutely. Bilateral procedure (OR 7.91, p < 0.001), living alone (OR 5.23, p < 0.001), older age groups (66-75 (OR 2.14, p = 0.001)); (> 75 (OR 5.02, p < 0.001)), poorer walking distance (1-2 blocks (OR 1.64, p = 0.023)); (housebound (OR 2.68, p = 0.009)), were significant predictors of IPR following THA. In the TKA cohort, the significant predictors of IPR discharge were female (OR 2.47, p < 0.001), older age (66-75 (OR 1.73, p = 0.021)); (> 75 (OR 4.23, p < 0.001)), bilateral procedure (OR 6.86, p < 0.001), obesity (OR 1.76, p = 0.006), living alone (OR 2.86, p = 0.001) and surgeon (surgeon 3 (OR 2.30, p = 0.024)); (surgeon 4 (OR 3.04, p = 0.003)); (surgeon 5 (OR 2.18, p = 0.046)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of IPR following TJA was associated with some clinically justifiable factors, such as bilateral procedure, older age, and living alone. However, other variables may be driven by inappropriate and potentially modifiable societal expectations, such as being female, obesity, treating surgeon, and limited walking distance.</p>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70170","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aims to identify the prevalence of inpatient rehabilitation (IPR) use in an Australian private total joint arthroplasty (TJA) cohort and to identify factors predictive of IPR discharge, including components of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT).

Methods: Primary TJA patients at a Sydney private hospital, between 2021 and 2022 were identified from an institutional arthroplasty database. Variables previously deemed as predictive factors for IPR facility discharge in the literature and components of RAPT were assessed utilising multivariable generalised linear model analysis.

Results: Of the 733 total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 776 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients included, 46% of THA and 64% of TKA subjects transferred to IPR post-acutely. Bilateral procedure (OR 7.91, p < 0.001), living alone (OR 5.23, p < 0.001), older age groups (66-75 (OR 2.14, p = 0.001)); (> 75 (OR 5.02, p < 0.001)), poorer walking distance (1-2 blocks (OR 1.64, p = 0.023)); (housebound (OR 2.68, p = 0.009)), were significant predictors of IPR following THA. In the TKA cohort, the significant predictors of IPR discharge were female (OR 2.47, p < 0.001), older age (66-75 (OR 1.73, p = 0.021)); (> 75 (OR 4.23, p < 0.001)), bilateral procedure (OR 6.86, p < 0.001), obesity (OR 1.76, p = 0.006), living alone (OR 2.86, p = 0.001) and surgeon (surgeon 3 (OR 2.30, p = 0.024)); (surgeon 4 (OR 3.04, p = 0.003)); (surgeon 5 (OR 2.18, p = 0.046)).

Conclusion: The use of IPR following TJA was associated with some clinically justifiable factors, such as bilateral procedure, older age, and living alone. However, other variables may be driven by inappropriate and potentially modifiable societal expectations, such as being female, obesity, treating surgeon, and limited walking distance.

全髋关节和膝关节置换术后出院与住院康复的预测因素——队列研究。
背景:本研究旨在确定澳大利亚私人全关节置换术(TJA)队列中住院康复(IPR)使用的患病率,并确定IPR出院的预测因素,包括风险评估和预测工具(RAPT)的组成部分。方法:从机构关节成形术数据库中确定2021年至2022年间悉尼一家私立医院的原发性TJA患者。以前在文献中被认为是知识产权设施排放的预测因素的变量和RAPT的组成部分利用多变量广义线性模型分析进行评估。结果:纳入的733例全髋关节置换术(THA)和776例全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者中,46%的THA和64%的TKA患者在急性期后转移到IPR。双侧手术(OR 7.91, p 75) (OR 5.02, p 75, p 4.23, p)结论:TJA术后IPR的使用与一些临床合理的因素有关,如双侧手术、年龄较大、独居。然而,其他变量可能由不适当的和潜在可改变的社会期望驱动,例如女性,肥胖,治疗外科医生和有限的步行距离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ANZ Journal of Surgery
ANZ Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
720
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信